Literature DB >> 31260790

Bridging blinded and unblinded analysis for ongoing safety monitoring and evaluation.

Li-An Lin1, Yilei Zhan2, Hal Li3, Shuai Sammy Yuan3, Greg Ball4, William Wang3.   

Abstract

In order to better characterize the safety profile of investigational new drugs (INDs) during clinical development, more interest and attention have been paid to ongoing safety monitoring and evaluation. The 2015 US FDA IND safety reporting draft guidance compels sponsors to periodically evaluate unblinded safety data. However, maintaining the trial blind is necessary to avoid jeopardizing the validity of study findings. In this article, we propose an innovative new approach which includes analyzing both blinded and unblinded data. The proposed two-stage framework incorporates periodic analyses of blinded safety data to detect and flag adverse events that may have potential risk elevation related to experimental treatment, as well as planned unblinded analyses to quantify associations between the drug and adverse events, and to determine thresholds for referring adverse events for medical review and safety reporting.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Blinded analysis; IND safety reporting; Multiplicity; Safety monitoring and evaluation; Unblinded analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31260790     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  1 in total

1.  Two-stage Bayesian hierarchical modeling for blinded and unblinded safety monitoring in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Junhao Liu; Jo Wick; Renee' H Martin; Caitlyn Meinzer; Dooti Roy; Byron Gajewski
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.615

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.