Literature DB >> 31260570

Performance of computational methods for the evaluation of pericentriolar material 1 missense variants in CAGI-5.

Alexander Miguel Monzon1, Marco Carraro1, Luigi Chiricosta1, Francesco Reggiani1,2, James Han3, Kivilcim Ozturk3, Yanran Wang4, Maximilian Miller4, Yana Bromberg4,5, Emidio Capriotti6, Castrense Savojardo7, Giulia Babbi7, Pier L Martelli7, Rita Casadio7, Panagiotis Katsonis8, Olivier Lichtarge8, Hannah Carter3, Maria Kousi9, Nicholas Katsanis10, Gaia Andreoletti11, John Moult12,13, Steven E Brenner11, Carlo Ferrari2, Emanuela Leonardi14, Silvio C E Tosatto1,15.   

Abstract

The CAGI-5 pericentriolar material 1 (PCM1) challenge aimed to predict the effect of 38 transgenic human missense mutations in the PCM1 protein implicated in schizophrenia. Participants were provided with 16 benign variants (negative controls), 10 hypomorphic, and 12 loss of function variants. Six groups participated and were asked to predict the probability of effect and standard deviation associated to each mutation. Here, we present the challenge assessment. Prediction performance was evaluated using different measures to conclude in a final ranking which highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each group. The results show a great variety of predictions where some methods performed significantly better than others. Benign variants played an important role as negative controls, highlighting predictors biased to identify disease phenotypes. The best predictor, Bromberg lab, used a neural-network-based method able to discriminate between neutral and non-neutral single nucleotide polymorphisms. The CAGI-5 PCM1 challenge allowed us to evaluate the state of the art techniques for interpreting the effect of novel variants for a difficult target protein.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioinformatics tools; community challenge; critical assessment; effect prediction; missense mutations; variant interpretation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31260570      PMCID: PMC7354699          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.700


  35 in total

Review 1.  Life is a journey: a genetic look at neocortical development.

Authors:  Amitabh Gupta; Li-Huei Tsai; Anthony Wynshaw-Boris
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Basal body dysfunction is a likely cause of pleiotropic Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

Authors:  Stephen J Ansley; Jose L Badano; Oliver E Blacque; Josephine Hill; Bethan E Hoskins; Carmen C Leitch; Jun Chul Kim; Alison J Ross; Erica R Eichers; Tanya M Teslovich; Allan K Mah; Robert C Johnsen; John C Cavender; Richard Alan Lewis; Michel R Leroux; Philip L Beales; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Functional analyses of variants reveal a significant role for dominant negative and common alleles in oligogenic Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

Authors:  Norann A Zaghloul; Yangjian Liu; Jantje M Gerdes; Cecilia Gascue; Edwin C Oh; Carmen C Leitch; Yana Bromberg; Jonathan Binkley; Rudolph L Leibel; Arend Sidow; Jose L Badano; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Trekking across the brain: the journey of neuronal migration.

Authors:  Ramsés Ayala; Tianzhi Shu; Li-Huei Tsai
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Automated processing of zebrafish imaging data: a survey.

Authors:  Ralf Mikut; Thomas Dickmeis; Wolfgang Driever; Pierre Geurts; Fred A Hamprecht; Bernhard X Kausler; María J Ledesma-Carbayo; Raphaël Marée; Karol Mikula; Periklis Pantazis; Olaf Ronneberger; Andres Santos; Rainer Stotzka; Uwe Strähle; Nadine Peyriéras
Journal:  Zebrafish       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Non-membranous granular organelle consisting of PCM-1: subcellular distribution and cell-cycle-dependent assembly/disassembly.

Authors:  Akiharu Kubo; Shoichiro Tsukita
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  A formal perturbation equation between genotype and phenotype determines the Evolutionary Action of protein-coding variations on fitness.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Zebrafish brain ventricle injection.

Authors:  Jennifer H Gutzman; Hazel Sive
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool.

Authors:  Hannah Carter; Christopher Douville; Peter D Stenson; David N Cooper; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  SNAP predicts effect of mutations on protein function.

Authors:  Yana Bromberg; Guy Yachdav; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  4 in total

1.  funtrp: identifying protein positions for variation driven functional tuning.

Authors:  Maximilian Miller; Daniel Vitale; Peter C Kahn; Burkhard Rost; Yana Bromberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 3.  Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Kevin Wilhelm; Amanda Williams; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.881

4.  In silico prediction of blood cholesterol levels from genotype data.

Authors:  Francesco Reggiani; Marco Carraro; Anna Belligoli; Marta Sanna; Chiara Dal Prà; Francesca Favaretto; Carlo Ferrari; Roberto Vettor; Silvio C E Tosatto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.