| Literature DB >> 31260445 |
Indira Ratnayake1, Fahim Mohamed1,2,3,4, Nicholas A Buckley1,2, Indika B Gawarammana1,5, Dhammika M Dissanayake1,6, Umesh Chathuranga1, Mahesh Munasinghe1, Kalana Maduwage7, Shaluka Jayamanne1, Zoltan H Endre4, Geoffrey K Isbister1,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication of snake envenoming, but early diagnosis remains problematic. We aimed to investigate the time course of novel renal biomarkers in AKI following Russell's viper (Daboia russelii) bites. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31260445 PMCID: PMC6625728 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Patient demographic and clinical data.
| No AKI | AKIN1 | AKIN2 | AKIN3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 16 | 24 | 13 | 12 |
| Males | 10 (63%) | 21(88%) | 11(85%) | 9(75%) |
| Median age (years) (range) | 30 (15–50) | 41 (16–66) | 51 (18–71) | 49.5 (22–76) |
| Median weight (kg) (range) | 54 (40–66) | 55 (46–68) | 65 (45–70) | 56.5 (40–70) |
| Median time to admission | 1h 27min | 1h 30min | 1h 10min | 1h 50min |
| Site of bite | ||||
| Lower Limb | 14 | 22 | 12 | 12 |
| Upper Limb | 2 | 1 | - | - |
| Clinical manifestations | ||||
| Local signs and symptoms | 14 (88%) | 18 (75%) | 12 (92%) | 12 (100%) |
| Positive WBCT20 | 8 (53%) | 19 (86%0 | 8 (67%) | 12 (100%) |
| Bleeding | 2 (13%) | 5 (21%) | 6 (46%) | 4 (33%) |
| Neurotoxicity | 9 (56%) | 10 (42%) | 9 (69%) | 8 (67%) |
| Median venom concentration (ng/ml) (range) | 59 (2–1456) (n = 10) | 50 (2–972) (n = 16) | 351 (2–3125) (n = 13) | 483 (2–2244) (n = 10) |
| Treatment with antivenom | 15 (94%) | 22 (92%) | 12 (92%) | 12 (100%) |
Neurotoxicity was the presence of any of ptosis, diplopia, blurred vision
Fig 1Flow chart of patient inclusion and acute kidney injury grading.
Thirty three patients who did not have two or more serum samples, one or more urine samples and at least one follow up (FU) serum sample available were excluded. One patient who had a serum creatinine value >2 mg/dl even at the follow up (FU) was excluded from the study as it is above the level of normal healthy adult.
Fig 2Scatter plots of the pre-antivenom Russell’s viper venom concentrations (median and interquartile range) for each of the acute injury groups.
Fig 3Maximum renal biomarker concentrations within 24 hours of bite.
Scatter plots of the maximum biomarker concentrations reached within 24 h post-bite for patients with no acute kidney injury (No AKI; green), mild AKI (grade 1; blue), moderate AKI (grade 2; orange) and severe AKI (grade 3; red), for serum creatinine (sCr; Panel A), serum cystatin C (sCysC; Panel B), urinary clusterin (uClu; Panel C), urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL; Panel D), kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1; Panel E),albumin (uAlb; Panel F),beta2-microglobulin (uβ2M; Panel G), urinary cystatin C (uCysC; Panel H), osteopontin(uOPN; Panel I) and trefoil factor-3 (uTFF3; Panel J).
Fig 4Time course of the median biomarker concentrations (with interquartile ranges) for each of the three patient groups (No acute kidney injury [No AKI; green], mild AKI [blue] and moderate to severe AKI [red]). AKI, AKIN stage 1 and AKIN stage 2/3) post-bite for 2 days, then at 1 and 3 months, including serum creatinine (sCr; Panel A), serum cystatin C (sCysC; Panel B), urinary clusterin (uClu; Panel C) and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL; Panel D). The grey shaded area is the normal range based on respective biomarkers measured in healthy individuals.
The area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve (with 95% confidence intervals) for biomarker concentrations predicting moderate to severe acute kidney injury (AKI) versus none or mild AKI, in each of the four time periods within the first 24h of the bite.
| AUC-ROC (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-4h | 4-8h | 8-16h | 16-24h | |
| 0.58 (0.41–0.76) | 0.71 (0.56–0.85) | 0.85 (0.74–0.95) | 0.76 (0.60–0.91) | |
| 0.67 (0.49–0.85) | 0.78 (0.64–0.93) | 0.80 (0.69–0.92) | 0.76 (0.59–0.92) | |
| 0.64 (0.42–0.87) | 0.74 (0.59–0.87) | 0.79 (0.68–0.90) | 0.75 (0.59–0.91) | |
| 0.58 (0.36–0.81) | 0.81 (0.69–0.93) | 0.75 (0.62–0.87) | 0.66 (0.48–0.83) | |
| 0.52 (0.29–0.74) | 0.66 (0.52–0.81) | 0.69 (0.56–0.83) | 0.64 (0.47–0.81) | |
| 0.56 (0.35–0.77) | 0.66 (0.51–0.81) | 0.67 (0.53–0.82) | 0.65 (0.47–0.82) | |
| 0.59 (0.37–0.82) | 0.60 (0.45–0.76) | 0.61 (0.46–0.76) | 0.59 (0.41–0.78) | |
| 0.63 (0.43–0.83) | 0.67 (0.52–0.81) | 0.56 (0.40–0.71) | 0.66 (0.48–0.83) | |
| 0.62 (0.41–0.83) | 0.56 (0.41–0.72) | 0.65 (0.51–0.79) | 0.66 (0.49–0.84) | |
| 0.59 (0.39–0.81) | 0.56 (0.40–0.71) | 0.62 (0.47–0.76) | 0.70 (0.53–0.87) | |
Fig 5Plots of the AUC-ROCs versus time for the best functional and structural biomarkers in detecting moderate/severe AKI versus No AKI/mild AKI, includingserum creatinine (sCr; Panel A), serum cystatin C (sCysC; Panel B), urinary clusterin (uClu; Panel C) and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL; Panel D).The dark black line represents the AUC-ROCs and the shaded area covers the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the AUC-ROC.