Literature DB >> 31260354

Impact Of Medicare Readmissions Penalties On Targeted Surgical Conditions.

Karan R Chhabra1, Andrew M Ibrahim2, Jyothi R Thumma3, Andrew M Ryan4, Justin B Dimick5.   

Abstract

The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, announced in 2010 to penalize excess readmissions for patients with selected medical diagnoses, was expanded in 2013 to include targeted surgical diagnoses, beginning with hip and knee replacements. Whether these surgical penalties reduced procedure-specific readmissions is not well understood. Using Medicare claims, we evaluated the penalty announcements' effects on risk-adjusted readmission rates, episode payments, lengths-of-stay, and observation status use. Risk-adjusted readmission rates declined for both procedures from 7.6 percent in 2008 to 5.5 percent in 2016. These rates were decreasing before the program was announced, but the rate of reductions doubled after the announcement of medical penalties in March 2010 (from -0.05 percentage points to -0.10 percentage points per quarter). After targeted surgical penalties were announced in August 2013, readmission reductions returned to near the baseline trend. During the same time period, mean episode payments and lengths-of-stay decreased substantially, and trends in observation status were unchanged. This suggests that medical readmission penalties led to readmission reductions for surgical patients as well, that targeted surgical penalties did not have an additional effect, and that readmission reductions are approaching a "floor" below which further reductions may be unlikely.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; Risk adjustment; acute care hospitals; episode spending; hospitals; joint replacement; readmissions rates; surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31260354     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  3 in total

1.  Impact of Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Penalties on Hip and Knee Replacement Readmissions: Comparison of Hospitals at Risk of Varying Penalty Amounts.

Authors:  Caroline P Thirukumaran; Brian E McGarry; Laurent G Glance; Meiling Ying; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Xueya Cai; Yue Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Effect of Remote Monitoring on Discharge to Home, Return to Activity, and Rehospitalization After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shivan J Mehta; Eric Hume; Andrea B Troxel; Catherine Reitz; Laurie Norton; Hannah Lacko; Caitlin McDonald; Jason Freeman; Noora Marcus; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

3.  Association of Discharge to Home vs Institutional Postacute Care With Outcomes After Lower Extremity Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Robert E Burke; Anne Canamucio; Elina Medvedeva; Eric L Hume; Amol S Navathe
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.