Literature DB >> 31260191

Stochastic simulation algorithms for computational systems biology: Exact, approximate, and hybrid methods.

Giulia Simoni1, Federico Reali1, Corrado Priami1,2, Luca Marchetti1.   

Abstract

Nowadays, mathematical modeling is playing a key role in many different research fields. In the context of system biology, mathematical models and their associated computer simulations constitute essential tools of investigation. Among the others, they provide a way to systematically analyze systems perturbations, develop hypotheses to guide the design of new experimental tests, and ultimately assess the suitability of specific molecules as novel therapeutic targets. To these purposes, stochastic simulation algorithms (SSAs) have been introduced for numerically simulating the time evolution of a well-stirred chemically reacting system by taking proper account of the randomness inherent in such a system. In this work, we review the main SSAs that have been introduced in the context of exact, approximate, and hybrid stochastic simulation. Specifically, we will introduce the direct method (DM), the first reaction method (FRM), the next reaction method (NRM) and the rejection-based SSA (RSSA) in the area of exact stochastic simulation. We will then present the τ-leaping method and the chemical Langevin method in the area of approximate stochastic simulation and an implementation of the hybrid RSSA (HRSSA) in the context of hybrid stochastic-deterministic simulation. Finally, we will consider the model of the sphingolipid metabolism to provide an example of application of SSA to computational system biology by exemplifying how different simulation strategies may unveil different insights into the investigated biological phenomenon. This article is categorized under: Models of Systems Properties and Processes > Mechanistic Models Analytical and Computational Methods > Computational Methods.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational; hybrid stochastic simulation; stochastic simulation; systems biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31260191     DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med        ISSN: 1939-005X


  5 in total

1.  Generalized stochastic microdosimetric model: The main formulation.

Authors:  F Cordoni; M Missiaggia; A Attili; S M Welford; E Scifoni; C La Tessa
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.529

Review 2.  History and Future Perspectives on the Discipline of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling and Its Applications.

Authors:  Karim Azer; Chanchala D Kaddi; Jeffrey S Barrett; Jane P F Bai; Sean T McQuade; Nathaniel J Merrill; Benedetto Piccoli; Susana Neves-Zaph; Luca Marchetti; Rosario Lombardo; Silvia Parolo; Selva Rupa Christinal Immanuel; Nitin S Baliga
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  A Novel Hybrid Logic-ODE Modeling Approach to Overcome Knowledge Gaps.

Authors:  Gianluca Selvaggio; Serena Cristellon; Luca Marchetti
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-12-20

4.  QSPcc reduces bottlenecks in computational model simulations.

Authors:  Danilo Tomasoni; Alessio Paris; Stefano Giampiccolo; Federico Reali; Giulia Simoni; Luca Marchetti; Chanchala Kaddi; Susana Neves-Zaph; Corrado Priami; Karim Azer; Rosario Lombardo
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 5.  Can Systems Biology Advance Clinical Precision Oncology?

Authors:  Andrea Rocca; Boris N Kholodenko
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.