OBJECTIVE: Parents and children affected by pediatric cancer are at risk for psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress. A link is believed to exist between parent and child distress; however, no systematic analysis of this relationship has occurred. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between parent and child distress among families affected by pediatric cancer. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using EBSCO (searching PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Academic search Premiere, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition) and PubMed. The initial search yielded a total of 29,118 articles. Inclusion criteria were that studies assessed the relation between parent and child distress in the context of pediatric cancer, were written in English, and were published in peer-reviewed journals. 28 articles met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was found between overall parent and child distress (r = .32, p < .001), such that increased parent-reported distress was associated with increased distress in their children. Significant relationships were also present among each type of parental distress (i.e., depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and global distress; rs = .31-.51, ps < .001) and overall child distress. Moderation analyses via meta-regression indicated that parent proxy-report of child symptoms was associated with a stronger relationship between parent and child distress than child self-report of their own distress. CONCLUSIONS: Aligned with the social-ecological framework, familial factors appear to be highly relevant in understanding distress following pediatric cancer diagnosis. Indeed, greater parent distress was associated with greater child distress.
OBJECTIVE: Parents and children affected by pediatric cancer are at risk for psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress. A link is believed to exist between parent and child distress; however, no systematic analysis of this relationship has occurred. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between parent and child distress among families affected by pediatric cancer. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using EBSCO (searching PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Academic search Premiere, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition) and PubMed. The initial search yielded a total of 29,118 articles. Inclusion criteria were that studies assessed the relation between parent and child distress in the context of pediatric cancer, were written in English, and were published in peer-reviewed journals. 28 articles met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was found between overall parent and child distress (r = .32, p < .001), such that increased parent-reported distress was associated with increased distress in their children. Significant relationships were also present among each type of parental distress (i.e., depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and global distress; rs = .31-.51, ps < .001) and overall child distress. Moderation analyses via meta-regression indicated that parent proxy-report of child symptoms was associated with a stronger relationship between parent and child distress than child self-report of their own distress. CONCLUSIONS: Aligned with the social-ecological framework, familial factors appear to be highly relevant in understanding distress following pediatric cancer diagnosis. Indeed, greater parent distress was associated with greater child distress.
Authors: Katie A Greenzang; Colleen A Kelly; Hasan Al-Sayegh; Clement Ma; Jennifer W Mack Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Sarah R McCarthy; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Derek L Gravholt; Jennifer E Clark; Jeannie Clark; Caree Fischer; Hannah Mulholland; Kristina Babcock; Victor M Montori; Amie Jones Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-05-05
Authors: Christina M Sharkey; Sasja A Schepers; Sarah Drake; Ahna L H Pai; Larry L Mullins; Martha A Grootenhuis Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2020-05-01
Authors: Erica Sood; Amy Jo Lisanti; Sarah E Woolf-King; Jo Wray; Nadine Kasparian; Emily Jackson; Mary R Gregory; Keila N Lopez; Bradley S Marino; Trent Neely; Amy Randall; Sinai C Zyblewski; Cheryl L Brosig Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Yuanhui Luo; Wei Xia; Ankie Tan Cheung; Laurie Long Kwan Ho; Jingping Zhang; Jianhui Xie; Pin Xiao; Ho Cheung William Li Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Nathan L Basile; Marie L Chardon; James Peugh; Clayton S Edwards; Lauren Szulczewski; Caroline F Morrison; Rajaram Nagarajan; Ayman El-Sheikh; John M Chaney; Ahna L H Pai; Larry L Mullins Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2021-10-18
Authors: Lexa K Murphy; Tonya M Palermo; Kathleen L Meert; Ron Reeder; J Michael Dean; Russell Banks; Robert A Berg; Joseph A Carcillo; Ranjit Chima; Julie McGalliard; Wren Haaland; Richard Holubkov; Peter M Mourani; Murray M Pollack; Anil Sapru; Samuel Sorenson; James W Varni; Jerry Zimmerman Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 3.971