Rita Serra1,2,3, Florence Coscas3,4, Jean François Boulet5, Diogo Cabral6, Marco Lupidi7, Gabriel J Coscas3,4, Eric H Souied3. 1. Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy. 2. Istituto di Ricerca Genetica e Biomedica (IRGB), CNR, Cittadella Universitaria di Cagliari, Monserrato, CA, Italy. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil, University Paris Est Creteil, Creteil, France. 4. Centre Ophtalmologique de l'Odeon, 113 bd Saint Germain, Paris, France. 5. Paris VI University, 361 rue Clément Ader, Bâtiment C, Evreux, France. 6. Instituto de Oftalmologia Dr. Gama Pinto, Lisboa, Portugal; and. 7. Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the long-term evolution of treatment-naive quiescent choroidal neovascularization (CNV), in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), to identify predictive activation biomarkers. METHODS: Patients with quiescent CNV underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographies, structural optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of structural OCT and OCT angiography images were performed during the study period. At the last follow-up evaluation, the enrolled eyes were divided into two groups: eyes with quiescent CNV converting to exudative AMD (eAMD) and those not progressing to eAMD. RESULTS: Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean follow-up duration was 40 ± 28 months using multimodal imaging and 22 ± 13 months using OCT angiography. On structural OCT, quiescent CNV not converting to eAMD showed a preferential growth of the pigment epithelium detachment greatest linear diameter (P = 0.009), whereas the eAMD group presented a preferential growth of the pigment epithelium detachment maximal height (P < 0.0001) during the study period. Quantitative analysis of choriocapillaris OCT angiograms confirmed the CNV area growth during follow-up (from 4.18 ± 4.77 mm at baseline to 5.10 ± 5.06 mm at the last follow-up visit; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A close follow-up is recommended to early identify predictive activation biomarkers of treatment-naive quiescent CNV.
PURPOSE: To assess the long-term evolution of treatment-naive quiescent choroidal neovascularization (CNV), in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), to identify predictive activation biomarkers. METHODS:Patients with quiescent CNV underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including fluorescein and indocyanine green angiographies, structural optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of structural OCT and OCT angiography images were performed during the study period. At the last follow-up evaluation, the enrolled eyes were divided into two groups: eyes with quiescent CNV converting to exudative AMD (eAMD) and those not progressing to eAMD. RESULTS: Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean follow-up duration was 40 ± 28 months using multimodal imaging and 22 ± 13 months using OCT angiography. On structural OCT, quiescent CNV not converting to eAMD showed a preferential growth of the pigment epithelium detachment greatest linear diameter (P = 0.009), whereas the eAMD group presented a preferential growth of the pigment epithelium detachment maximal height (P < 0.0001) during the study period. Quantitative analysis of choriocapillaris OCT angiograms confirmed the CNV area growth during follow-up (from 4.18 ± 4.77 mm at baseline to 5.10 ± 5.06 mm at the last follow-up visit; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A close follow-up is recommended to early identify predictive activation biomarkers of treatment-naive quiescent CNV.
Authors: Thomas J Heesterbeek; Laura Lorés-Motta; Carel B Hoyng; Yara T E Lechanteur; Anneke I den Hollander Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Shan Liu; Antje K Biesemeier; Alexander V Tschulakow; Harsh V Thakkar; Sylvie Julien-Schraermeyer; Ulrich Schraermeyer Journal: Biol Open Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 2.422