| Literature DB >> 31259186 |
Austin Pitcher1, Christopher Langhammer2, Brian T Feeley1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding soft tissue injury patterns associated with greater tuberosity (GT) fractures may help clinicians provide guidance to patients. HYPOTHESIS: Evaluating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with suspected isolated GT fractures will help elucidate the role of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: MRI; biceps; greater tuberosity fracture; labrum; rotator cuff
Year: 2019 PMID: 31259186 PMCID: PMC6589966 DOI: 10.1177/2325967119851472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Patient selection flowchart. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Cohort Demographics
| Demographic | n (%) | Mean Age, y | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 32 | 47.2 | 15.9 |
| Male | 19 (59) | 43.7 | 13.5 |
| Female | 13 (41) | 42.2 | 18.2 |
| Mechanism | |||
| Fall from standing | 12 (38) | 59.1 | 14.7 |
| Sport | 8 (25) | 47.4 | 12.1 |
| Vehicular trauma | 8 (25) | 31.3 | 6.4 |
| Clinic follow-up, d | 214 (281) | ||
| Time to MRI, d | 84 (273) |
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
= .16.
Figure 2.Fracture displacement as measured by MRI versus radiography. Closed circles represent patients with routine recovery, while open circles represent those who experienced delayed recovery. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Radiographic Features
| Mean | Total (N = 32) | Early MRI (n = 27) | Late MRI (n = 5) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Displacement, mm | ||||
| Radiography | 2.8 | |||
| MRI | 3.5 | |||
|
| .156 | |||
| Rotator cuff tear | ||||
| Full thickness | 3 (9) | 2 (7.4) | 1 (20) | |
| Partial thickness | 23 (72) | 18 (67) | 5 (100) | |
| Biceps tendon tear | 13 (41) | 9 (33) | 4 (80) | |
| Labral tear | 16 (50) | 16 (59) | 0 (0) | |
| Capsular tear | 9 (28) | 9 (33) | 0 (0) |
Values are presented as n (%) unless noted otherwise. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Results of Regression Analysis Analyzing Relationship of Fracture Displacement and Presence of Soft Tissue Findings on MRI
| Variable | Estimate (SE) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | –0.409 (0.168) | .028 |
| Age | –0.011 (0.007) | .124 |
| Dominant injury | –0.052 (0.158) | .748 |
| Displacement | ||
| Radiography | 0.225 (0.104) | .048 |
| MRI | –0.093 (0.091) | .324 |
| Radiography:MRI | –0.011 (0.020) | .583 |
| Soft tissue injury | ||
| RCT | 0.055 (0.261) | .837 |
| Partial RCT | 0.396 (0.169) | .034 |
| Labral tear | –0.478 (0.146) | .005 |
| Biceps injury | 0.371 (0.155) | .031 |
| Capsular injury | 0.217 (0.177) | .24 |
| Mechanism of injury | ||
| Fall from standing | –0.270 (0.271) | .336 |
| Sport | 0.044 (0.258) | .866 |
| Vehicular trauma | –0.526 (0.266) | .068 |
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RCT, rotator cuff tear.
Statistically significant, P < .05.
Statistically significant, P < .01.