| Literature DB >> 31258947 |
Hikaru Tomoe1, Kaori Yamashita1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of repeated bladder hydrodistension with transurethral resection or fulguration (TUF) of Hunner's lesions on bladder capacity and interstitial cystitis (IC) symptoms. TUF for Hunner's lesion is recommended in several IC/BPS guidelines, although recurrence is highly probable. Patients and methods: The study cohort comprised 44 IC patients with Hunner's lesions who underwent multiple bladder hydrodistensions with TUF and electrocautery (EC) at our institution between July 2005 and June 2018. We analysed their frequency-volume chart, O'Leary Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI), Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, before and at 2, 6, and 12 months after surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Hunner’s lesion; Interstitial cystitis; bladder contraction; transurethral fulguration
Year: 2019 PMID: 31258947 PMCID: PMC6583749 DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1589753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arab J Urol ISSN: 2090-598X
Patients’ characteristics and preoperative data.
| Variable | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, female:male, | 42:2 | 42:2 | 20:2 | ||
| Mean (SD): | |||||
| Age, years | 66.8 (8.1) | 68.8 (8.1) | 72.3 (6.3) | 0.125 | 0.002 |
| 24-h frequency, | 20.3 (14.5) | 16.1 (6.4) | 17.1 (8.7) | 0.046 | 0.138 |
| AVV, mL | 102 (43) | 117 (47) | 123 (46) | 0.056 | 0.039 |
| MVV, mL | 173 (74) | 166 (63) | 168 (70) | 0.331 | 0.405 |
| ICSI | 15.8 (3.5) | 13,2 (4.0) | 12.0 (4.1) | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| ICPI | 12.9 (3.5) | 10.0.(4.2) | 9.9 (4.4) | <0.001 | <0.005 |
| VAS pain score | 7.5 (2.1) | 6.1 (2.3) | 6.2 (2.4) | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Bladder capacity at hydrodistention, mL | 440 (133) | 427 (148) | 349 (131) | 0.342 | 0.008 |
The differences between the two groups were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Figure 1.Changes from baseline in AVV and MVV. There was a significant difference between groups 2 or 3 and Group 1 in AVV at 6 months after surgery and the trend continued at 12 months after surgery.
Figure 2.Changes from baseline in ICSI and ICPI. There was a significant difference between groups 2 or 3 and Group 1 in ICSI and ICPI at 6 months after surgery and the trend continued at 12 months after surgery.
Figure 3.Changes from baseline in VAS for pain. There was a significant difference between groups 2 or 3 and Group 1 in VAS pain score at 6 months after surgery and the trend continued at 12 months after surgery.