Literature DB >> 31257704

Robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy: A phase 1 clinical study.

Chi-Fai Ng1, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh1, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu1, Chi-Hang Yee1, Chi-Kwok Chan1, Simon See-Ming Hou1, Jihad Kaouk2, Eddie Shu-Yin Chan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci single-port surgical system.
METHODS: This was a prospective phase 1 clinical study of prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci single-port surgical system. Primary outcome measures included the conversion rate and 30-day complications after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, duration of catheterization, final pathological outcomes and number of lymph nodes yielded at pelvic lymphadenectomy.
RESULTS: From February to August 2017, 20 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 67.7 ± 6.0 years. The mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen level was 15.3 ± 11.3 ng/mL, and the mean prostate size was 36.6 ± 15.5 mL. Preoperatively, 12 (60%) patients had a Gleason score of 6, four (20%) had a Gleason score of 7 and four (20%) had a Gleason score of 8-10. The mean operative time was 208.9 ± 35.2 min, and the mean blood loss was 296.3 ± 220.7 mL. None of the patients required conversion. The mean hospital stay was 5.0 ± 1.7 days. Among the patients, six (15%) had T2a disease, one (5%) had T2b disease, seven (35%) had T2c disease and nine (45%) had T3a disease on final pathology. A mean number of 8.3 ± 7.1 lymph nodes were yielded at pelvic lymphadenectomy. There were no intraoperative complications. The observed postoperative complications were Clavien grade I-II, and all resolved with conservative management.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci surgical system is safe and technically feasible.
© 2019 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  perioperative outcome; prostate cancer; robotic prostatectomy; safety; single-port

Year:  2019        PMID: 31257704     DOI: 10.1111/iju.14044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  6 in total

Review 1.  Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Lai; Ryan W Dobbs; Susan Talamini; Whitney R Halgrimson; Jessica O Wilson; Hari T Vigneswaran; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

2.  Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Guilherme Sawczyn; Clark A Wilson; Juan Garisto; Jihad Kaouk
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

3.  Pure single-port retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP: Initial experience and technique description.

Authors:  Periklis Koukourikis; Ali Abdullah Alqahtani; Woong Kyu Han; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-01-12

Review 4.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Advancements in surgical technique and perioperative care.

Authors:  Isaac Palma-Zamora; Firas Abdollah; Craig Rogers; Wooju Jeong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-27

5.  Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP system: A single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Wan Song; Hana Yoon; Dong Hyeon Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-01-30

6.  Radical prostatectomy technique in the robotic evolution: from da Vinci standard to single port-a single surgeon pathway.

Authors:  Simone Francavilla; Alessandro Veccia; Ryan W Dobbs; Fabio Zattoni; Hari T Vigneswaran; Alessandro Antonelli; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Riccardo Autorino; Claudio Simeone; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-02-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.