Literature DB >> 31257579

Rituximab as an adjuvant therapy for pemphigus: experience in 61 patients from a single center with long-term follow-up.

Vinod K Sharma1, Vishal Gupta1, Neetu Bhari1, Vishwajeet Singh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rituximab is increasingly being used as an adjuvant treatment for recalcitrant or relapsed pemphigus, but information on its use as a first-line agent is limited. We describe the long-term effectiveness and safety of rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus and compare the treatment outcomes when rituximab is used as first-line treatment vis-à-vis after treatment failure or relapse.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 61 patients with pemphigus treated with rituximab at our center from March 2012 to October 2018.
RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 51 achieved complete remission (on or off treatment) and 10 had partial remission. Forty-nine (80.33%) patients achieved complete remission off prednisolone over a mean period of 8.08 ± 4.45 (range 3-20) months. Seventeen (27.9%) patients relapsed after a mean period of 23.94 ± 13.15 months after first rituximab cycle and 15.97 + 13.7 months after stopping prednisolone. Treatment-related serious adverse effects were noted in six (9.8%) patients. Eighteen (29.5%) patients were administered rituximab as the first-line adjuvant, while 43 (70.5%) patients received it after treatment failure or relapse. In both groups, remission rates on prednisolone (88.9%, 81.4%) and off prednisolone (88.9%, 76.7%) were comparable (P > 0.05). Relapse rates in the group which received rituximab as first-line treatment were about half of those who received rituximab after relapse or treatment failure (16.7% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.348). No statistically significant difference was seen in the times to different treatment endpoints (disease control, complete remission on and off prednisolone, and relapse) between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is a safe and effective adjuvant in the treatment of pemphigus. Treatment outcomes were better for patients who received rituximab as first-line treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant.
© 2019 The International Society of Dermatology.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31257579     DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dermatol        ISSN: 0011-9059            Impact factor:   2.736


  5 in total

1.  Rituximab - Progress but Still Not a Final Resolution for Pemphigus Patients: Clinical Report From a Single Center Study.

Authors:  Joško Miše; Ines Lakoš Jukić; Branka Marinović
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Rituximab Therapy for Treatment of Pemphigus in Southeast Asians.

Authors:  Silada Kanokrungsee; Tanaporn Anuntrangsee; Jutamas Tankunakorn; Ploychompoo Srisuwanwattana; Poonkiat Suchonwanit; Kumutnart Chanprapaph
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.162

3.  Inpatient Dermatology Consultations in a General Surgery Ward in a Tertiary Hospital in China: A Retrospective Study of 251 Patients.

Authors:  Hanlin Zhang; Keyun Tang; Rouyu Fang; Hongzhong Jin; Qiuning Sun
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-04-22

4.  The Demographic Attributes, Clinical Features, and Optimal Management of 143 Patients with Pemphigus: A Retrospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Center of India.

Authors:  Vikram K Mahajan; Karaninder S Mehta; Jyotshna Sharma; Prabal Kumar; Pushpinder S Chauhan; Ravinder Singh; Sujaya Manvi; Sanket Vashist; Anuj Sharma; Anju L Sharma
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2022-03-03

5.  Efficacy of Repeated Courses of Rituximab as Treatment for Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Authors:  Sharon Baum; Tal Raviv; Sarit Gilboa; Felix Pavlotsky; Aviv Barzilai
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.875

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.