Literature DB >> 31257527

Expression of GLS1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its clinical significance.

Jun Cao1, Chi Zhang2, Guo-Qing Jiang2, Sheng-Jie Jin2, Zhi-Hui Gao2, Qian Wang2, De-Cai Yu3, Ai-Wu Ke4, Yi-Qun Fan5, Da-Wei Li5, Ao-Qing Wang2, Dou-Sheng Bai2.   

Abstract

Kidney‑type glutaminase (GLS1) plays a significant role in tumor metabolism. Our recent studies demonstrated that GLS1 was aberrantly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and facilitated tumor progression. However, the roles of GLS1 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remain largely unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the expression and clinical significance of GLS1 in ICC. For this purpose, combined data from the Oncomine database with those of immunohistochemistry were used to determine the expression levels of GLS1 in cancerous and non‑cancerous tissues. Second, a wound‑healing assay and Transwell assay were used to observe the effects of the knockdown and overexpression of GLS1 on the invasion and migration of ICC cells. We examined the associations between the expression of GLS1 and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition (EMT)‑related markers by western blot analysis. Finally, we examined the associations between GLS1 levels and clinicopathological factors or patient prognosis. The results revealed that GLS1 was overexpressed in different digestive system tumors, including ICC, and that GLS1 expression in ICC tissue was higher than that in peritumoral tissue. The overexpression of GLS1 in RBE cells induced metastasis and invasion. Moreover, the EMT‑related markers, E‑cadherin and Vimentin, were regulated by GLS1 in ICC cells. By contrast, the knockdown of GLS1 expression in QBC939 cells yielded opposite results. Clinically, a high expression of GLS1 in ICC samples negatively correlated with E‑cadherin expression and positively correlated with Vimentin expression. GLS1 protein expression was associated with tumor differentiation (P=0.001) and lymphatic metastasis (P=0.029). Importantly, patients with a high GLS1 expression had a poorer overall survival (OS) and a shorter time to recurrence than patients with a low GLS1 expression. Multivariate analysis indicated that GLS1 expression was an independent prognostic indicator. On the whole, the findings of this study demonstrated that GLS1 is an independent prognostic biomarker of ICC. GLS1 facilitates ICC progression and may thus prove to be a therapeutic target in ICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31257527     DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


  10 in total

Review 1.  Targeting Cancer Metabolism and Current Anti-Cancer Drugs.

Authors:  Witchuda Sukjoi; Jarunya Ngamkham; Paul V Attwood; Sarawut Jitrapakdee
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Maciaczyk; Ulf D Kahlert; Katharina Koch; Rudolf Hartmann; Julia Tsiampali; Constanze Uhlmann; Ann-Christin Nickel; Xiaoling He; Marcel A Kamp; Michael Sabel; Roger A Barker; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Daniel Hänggi; Dieter Willbold
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2020-04-16

3.  Prognostic value of glutaminase 1 in breast cancer depends on H3K27me3 expression and menopausal status.

Authors:  Meng Zhou; Qian-Xin Chen; Yuan-Zhong Yang; Zhuo-Zhi Liang; Yue-Lin Li; Zi-Yi Huang; Zi-Jin Weng; Xiao-Fang Zhang; Jie-Xia Guan; Lu-Ying Tang; Ze-Fang Ren
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  GLS1 is a protective factor in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma and its expression does not correlate with ARID1A-mutated tumors.

Authors:  Valentino Clemente; Asumi Hoshino; Mihir Shetty; Andrew Nelson; Britt K Erickson; Ruth Baker; Nathan Rubin; Mahmoud Khalifa; S John Weroha; Emil Lou; Martina Bazzaro
Journal:  Cancer Res Commun       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 5.  Correlation between amino acid metabolism and self-renewal of cancer stem cells: Perspectives in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Wei Li
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.247

6.  Evaluation of Glutaminase Expression in Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Correlation with Clinicopathologic Parameters.

Authors:  Zin W Myint; Ramon C Sun; Patrick J Hensley; Andrew C James; Peng Wang; Stephen E Strup; Robert J McDonald; Donglin Yan; William H St Clair; Derek B Allison
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Mechanism of miR-455-3 in suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Chong Meng; Kai Liu; Xingjun Cai; Yongxing Chen
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.827

8.  A comparative pharmaco-metabolomic study of glutaminase inhibitors in glioma stem-like cells confirms biological effectiveness but reveals differences in target-specificity.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Maciaczyk; Ulf D Kahlert; Katharina Koch; Rudolf Hartmann; Julia Tsiampali; Constanze Uhlmann; Ann-Christin Nickel; Xiaoling He; Marcel A Kamp; Michael Sabel; Roger A Barker; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Daniel Hänggi; Dieter Willbold
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 9.  Targeting Glutaminolysis: New Perspectives to Understand Cancer Development and Novel Strategies for Potential Target Therapies.

Authors:  Zhefang Wang; Fanyu Liu; Ningbo Fan; Chenghui Zhou; Dai Li; Thomas Macvicar; Qiongzhu Dong; Christiane J Bruns; Yue Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Autophagy-related circRNA evaluation reveals hsa_circ_0001747 as a potential favorable prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chuanfan Zhong; Kaihui Wu; Shuo Wang; Zining Long; Taowei Yang; Weibo Zhong; Xiao Tan; Zixian Wang; Chuanyin Li; Jianming Lu; Xiangming Mao
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 8.469

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.