Literature DB >> 31257054

Patient-specific haemodynamic simulations of complex aortic dissections informed by commonly available clinical datasets.

Mirko Bonfanti1, Gaia Franzetti2, Gabriele Maritati3, Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam4, Stavroula Balabani2, Vanessa Díaz-Zuccarini5.   

Abstract

Patient-specific computational fluid-dynamics (CFD) can assist the clinical decision-making process for Type-B aortic dissection (AD) by providing detailed information on the complex intra-aortic haemodynamics. This study presents a new approach for the implementation of personalised CFD models using non-invasive, and oftentimes minimal, datasets commonly collected for AD monitoring. An innovative way to account for arterial compliance in rigid-wall simulations using a lumped capacitor is introduced, and a parameter estimation strategy for boundary conditions calibration is proposed. The approach was tested on three complex cases of AD, and the results were successfully compared against invasive blood pressure measurements. Haemodynamic results (e.g. intraluminal pressures, flow partition between the lumina, wall shear-stress based indices) provided information that could not be obtained using imaging alone, providing insight into the state of the disease. It was noted that small tears in the distal intimal flap induce disturbed flow in both lumina. Moreover, oscillatory pressures across the intimal flap were often observed in proximity to the tears in the abdominal region, which could indicate a risk of dynamic obstruction of the true lumen. This study shows how combining commonly available clinical data with computational modelling can be a powerful tool to enhance clinical understanding of AD.
Copyright © 2019 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic compliance; Aortic dissection; Boundary conditions; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Model personalisation; Parameter calibration; Patient-specific simulations; Windkessel model

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31257054     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  8 in total

1.  An optimal control approach to determine resistance-type boundary conditions from in-vivo data for cardiovascular simulations.

Authors:  Elisa Fevola; Francesco Ballarin; Laura Jiménez-Juan; Stephen Fremes; Stefano Grivet-Talocia; Gianluigi Rozza; Piero Triverio
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 2.648

2.  Geometric Analysis of Type B Aortic Dissections Shows Aortic Remodeling After Intervention Using Multilayer Stents.

Authors:  Victor S Costache; Jorn P Meekel; Andreea Costache; Tatiana Melnic; Crina Solomon; Anca M Chitic; Cristian Bucurenciu; Horatiu Moldovan; Iulian Antoniac; Gabriela Candea; Kak K Yeung
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) For Predicting Pathological Changes In The Aorta: Is It Ready For Clinical Use?

Authors:  Dominik Obrist; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  An integrated fluid-structure interaction and thrombosis model for type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Mei Yan Chong; Boram Gu; Chlöe Harriet Armour; Socrates Dokos; Zhi Chao Ong; Xiao Yun Xu; Einly Lim
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  Patient-Specific Cerebral Blood Flow Simulation Based on Commonly Available Clinical Datasets.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Shen; Yanji Wei; Reinoud P H Bokkers; Maarten Uyttenboogaart; J Marc C Van Dijk
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-04

6.  A predictive patient-specific computational model of coronary artery bypass grafts for potential use by cardiac surgeons to guide selection of graft configurations.

Authors:  Krish Chaudhuri; Alexander Pletzer; Nicolas P Smith
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-27

7.  A Combined In Vivo, In Vitro, In Silico Approach for Patient-Specific Haemodynamic Studies of Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Mirko Bonfanti; Gaia Franzetti; Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam; Vanessa Díaz-Zuccarini; Stavroula Balabani
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Association of hemodynamic factors and progressive aortic dilatation following type A aortic dissection surgical repair.

Authors:  Yu Zhu; Saeed Mirsadraee; George Asimakopoulos; Alessia Gambaro; Ulrich Rosendahl; John Pepper; Xiao Yun Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.