Anna R LaRosa1, Alexandra M Pusateri2, Andrew D Althouse2, Abigail S Mathier3, Utibe R Essien4, Jared W Magnani5. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America. 2. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America. 3. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Division of Cardiology, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America. Electronic address: magnanij@pitt.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient success with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires adequate health literacy to understand the disease and rationale for treatment. We hypothesized that individuals receiving treatment for AF would have increased knowledge about AF and that such knowledge would be modified by education and income. METHODS: We enrolled adults with AF receiving anticoagulation at ambulatory clinic sites. Participants responded to survey items encompassing the definitions of AF and stroke, the rationale for anticoagulation, and an estimation of their annual stroke risk. We examined responses in relation to household income and education in multivariable-adjusted models. RESULTS: We enrolled 339 individuals (age 72.0 ± 10.1; 43% women) with predominantly lower annual income ($20-49,999, n = 99, 29.2%) and a range of educational attainment (high school or vocational, n = 117, 34.5%). Participants demonstrated moderate AF knowledge (1.7 ± 0.6; range 0-2) but limited knowledge about anticoagulation (1.3 ± 0.7; range 0-3) or stroke (1.5 ± 0.8; range 0-3). Income was not associated with improvement in AF (P = 0.32 for trend), anticoagulation (P = 0.27) or stroke knowledge (P = 0.26). Individuals with bachelor or graduate degree had greater AF (1.8 ± 0.5) and stroke (1.6 ± 0.8) knowledge relative to those with high school or vocational training (1.4 ± 0.7 and 1.2 ± 0.9; P ≪ 0.01, both estimates). Education was not associated with understanding the rationale for anticoagulation. Most participants (230, 68%) estimated their annual stroke risk as ≥15%. CONCLUSIONS: We identified consistent, fundamental gaps in disease-specific knowledge in a cohort of adults receiving treatment for non-valvular AF. Improved patient understanding of this complex and chronic disease may enhance shared decision making, patient engagement, anticoagulation adherence, and clinical outcomes in AF.
BACKGROUND: Patient success with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires adequate health literacy to understand the disease and rationale for treatment. We hypothesized that individuals receiving treatment for AF would have increased knowledge about AF and that such knowledge would be modified by education and income. METHODS: We enrolled adults with AF receiving anticoagulation at ambulatory clinic sites. Participants responded to survey items encompassing the definitions of AF and stroke, the rationale for anticoagulation, and an estimation of their annual stroke risk. We examined responses in relation to household income and education in multivariable-adjusted models. RESULTS: We enrolled 339 individuals (age 72.0 ± 10.1; 43% women) with predominantly lower annual income ($20-49,999, n = 99, 29.2%) and a range of educational attainment (high school or vocational, n = 117, 34.5%). Participants demonstrated moderate AF knowledge (1.7 ± 0.6; range 0-2) but limited knowledge about anticoagulation (1.3 ± 0.7; range 0-3) or stroke (1.5 ± 0.8; range 0-3). Income was not associated with improvement in AF (P = 0.32 for trend), anticoagulation (P = 0.27) or stroke knowledge (P = 0.26). Individuals with bachelor or graduate degree had greater AF (1.8 ± 0.5) and stroke (1.6 ± 0.8) knowledge relative to those with high school or vocational training (1.4 ± 0.7 and 1.2 ± 0.9; P ≪ 0.01, both estimates). Education was not associated with understanding the rationale for anticoagulation. Most participants (230, 68%) estimated their annual stroke risk as ≥15%. CONCLUSIONS: We identified consistent, fundamental gaps in disease-specific knowledge in a cohort of adults receiving treatment for non-valvular AF. Improved patient understanding of this complex and chronic disease may enhance shared decision making, patient engagement, anticoagulation adherence, and clinical outcomes in AF.
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Hugh Calkins; Lin Y Chen; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Karen L Furie; Paul A Heidenreich; Katherine T Murray; Julie B Shea; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Luke Seaburg; Erik P Hess; Megan Coylewright; Henry H Ting; Christopher J McLeod; Victor M Montori Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jeroen M L Hendriks; Harry J G M Crijns; Robert G Tieleman; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Stephanie R Reading; Alan S Go; Margaret C Fang; Daniel E Singer; In-Lu Amy Liu; Mary Helen Black; Natalia Udaltsova; Kristi Reynolds Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Emily Guhl; Andrew Althouse; Michael Sharbaugh; Alexandra M Pusateri; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Jared W Magnani Journal: Open Heart Date: 2019-04-11
Authors: Raisa L Silva; Emily N Guhl; Andrew D Althouse; Brandon Herbert; Michael Sharbaugh; Utibe R Essien; Leslie R M Hausmann; Jared W Magnani Journal: Am J Prev Cardiol Date: 2021-09-03