Literature DB >> 31256708

Feasibility of the two-point method for assessing the force-velocity relationship during lower-body and upper-body isokinetic tests.

Danica Janicijevic1, Amador García-Ramos2,3, Olivera M Knezevic4, Dragan M Mirkov1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) evaluate the shape of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship obtained from different muscles, (2) explore the concurrent validity of the two-point method with respect to the multiple-point method, (3) evaluate whether the F-V relationship can discriminate between muscle groups and genders, and (4) explore the generalisability of the same F-V relationship parameters (maximal force [F0], maximal velocity [V0]), and maximal power [P0]) between different tasks. The F-V relationship of 22 physically active participants (12 women) were tested during knee extension, knee flexion, elbow extension and elbow flexion through the multiple- (eight velocities: 30-60-90-120-150-180-210-240º/s) and two-point (two velocities: 60-180º/s) methods. The findings revealed (1) highly linear F-V relationships (r ≥ 0.893), (2) high concurrent validity of the two-point method for F0, but lower for V0 and P0, (3) the outcomes of both methods were sensitive to the muscle groups (higher for knee muscles) and gender (higher for men), and (4) the magnitude of the same F-V parameters were poorly correlated between different tasks (median r < 0.1). These results support the two-point method as a valid and sensitive procedure for determining the maximal capacities of the muscles to produce F, but not V, during isokinetic tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Muscle capacities; generalizability; sensitivity; validity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31256708     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1636523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

1.  A novel equation that incorporates the linear and hyperbolic nature of the force-velocity relationship in lower and upper limb exercises.

Authors:  Julian Alcazar; Fernando Pareja-Blanco; Carlos Rodriguez-Lopez; Hector Gutierrez-Reguero; Juan Sanchez-Valdepeñas; Pedro J Cornejo-Daza; Ignacio Ara; Luis M Alegre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  The Validity of the 2-Point Method for Assessing the Force-Velocity Relationship of the Knee Flexors and Knee Extensors: The Relevance of Distant Force-Velocity Testing.

Authors:  Matic Sašek; Dragan M Mirkov; Vedran Hadžić; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants' Physical Activity Levels.

Authors:  Danica Janicijevic; Olivera M Knezevic; Amador Garcia-Ramos; Danilo Cvetic; Dragan M Mirkov
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Are the Parameters of Novel Two-Point Force-Velocity Model Generalizable in Leg Muscles?

Authors:  Saša Đurić; Vladimir Grbić; Milena Živković; Nikola Majstorović; Vedrana Sember
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Effects of Resistance Training With Constant, Inertial, and Combined Loads on Muscle Power and Strength Output.

Authors:  Saša Đurić; Olivera M Knezevic; Vedrana Sember; Ivan Cuk; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Maja Pajek; Dragan M Mirkov
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.