Literature DB >> 31255788

Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of mortality in spinal epidural abscess.

Aditya V Karhade1, Akash A Shah2, Christopher M Bono1, Marco L Ferrone3, Sandra B Nelson4, Andrew J Schoenfeld3, Mitchel B Harris1, Joseph H Schwab5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In-hospital and short-term mortality in patients with spinal epidural abscess (SEA) remains unacceptably high despite diagnostic and therapeutic advancements. Forecasting this potentially avoidable consequence at the time of admission could improve patient management and counseling. Few studies exist to meet this need, and none have explored methodologies such as machine learning.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop machine learning algorithms for prediction of in-hospital and 90-day postdischarge mortality in SEA. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Retrospective, case-control study at two academic medical centers and three community hospitals from 1993 to 2016. PATIENTS SAMPLE: Adult patients with an inpatient admission for radiologically confirmed diagnosis of SEA. OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital and 90-day postdischarge mortality.
METHODS: Five machine learning algorithms (elastic-net penalized logistic regression, random forest, stochastic gradient boosting, neural network, and support vector machine) were developed and assessed by discrimination, calibration, overall performance, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 1,053 SEA patients were identified in the study, with 134 (12.7%) experiencing in-hospital or 90-day postdischarge mortality. The stochastic gradient boosting model achieved the best performance across discrimination, c-statistic=0.89, calibration, and decision curve analysis. The variables used for prediction of 90-day mortality, ranked by importance, were age, albumin, platelet count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, hemodialysis, active malignancy, and diabetes. The final algorithm was incorporated into a web application available here: https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/seamortality/.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms show promise on internal validation for prediction of 90-day mortality in SEA. Future studies are needed to externally validate these algorithms in independent populations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Healthcare; Machine learning; Mortality; Spinal epidural abscess; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31255788     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  9 in total

Review 1.  Predictive modeling in spine surgery.

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Babak Saravi; Frank Hassel; Sara Ülkümen; Alisia Zink; Veronika Shavlokhova; Sebastien Couillard-Despres; Martin Boeker; Peter Obid; Gernot Michael Lang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-22

3.  Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Akash A Shah; Sai K Devana; Changhee Lee; Amador Bugarin; Elizabeth L Lord; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park; Mihaela van der Schaar; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  SMART on FHIR in spine: integrating clinical prediction models into electronic health records for precision medicine at the point of care.

Authors:  Aditya V Karhade; Joseph H Schwab; Guilherme Del Fiol; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  A Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Diseases.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-04-24

6.  The prediction of mortality influential variables in an intensive care unit: a case study.

Authors:  Naghmeh Khajehali; Zohreh Khajehali; Mohammad Jafar Tarokh
Journal:  Pers Ubiquitous Comput       Date:  2021-02-26

7.  Potential benefits, unintended consequences, and future roles of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery research : a call to emphasize data quality and indications.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Melissa Orr; Viktor Krebs; Mohit Bhandari; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-01

8.  Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar D Lopez; Venkat Boddapati; Joseph M Lombardi; Nathan J Lee; Justin Mathew; Nicholas C Danford; Rajiv R Iyer; Marc D Dyrszka; Zeeshan M Sardar; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28

9.  Feasibility and Assessment of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Outcome After Lumbar Decompression Surgery.

Authors:  Arthur André; Bruno Peyrou; Alexandre Carpentier; Jean-Jacques Vignaux
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.