Francisco Azcarate-Velázquez1, Raquel Castillo-Oyagüe2, Luis-Guillermo Oliveros-López3, Daniel Torres-Lagares4, Álvaro-José Martínez-González5, Andrea Pérez-Velasco6, Christopher D Lynch7, José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez8, María-Ángeles Serrera-Figallo9. 1. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, U.S., Calle Avicena s/n, 41009, Seville, Spain. Electronic address: fco_azc_vel@hotmail.com. 2. Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, U.C.M., Pza. Ramón y Cajal s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: rcastill@ucm.es. 3. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, U.S., Calle Avicena s/n, 41009, Seville, Spain. Electronic address: lg_kn7@hotmail.com. 4. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, U.S., Calle Avicena s/n, 41009, Seville, Spain. Electronic address: danieltl@us.es. 5. ICEMM S.L.U., 8. Oficina 0-08. Edificio Antares, Calle las Fábricas, 28923, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: alvaro.martinez@icemm.es. 6. ICEMM S.L.U., 8. Oficina 0-08. Edificio Antares, Calle las Fábricas, 28923, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: andrea.perez@icemm.es. 7. University Dental School & Hospital/ University College Cork, T12 E8YV, Wilton, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: chris.lynch@ucc.ie. 8. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, U.S., Calle Avicena s/n, 41009, Seville, Spain. Electronic address: jlgp@us.es. 9. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, U.S., Calle Avicena s/n, 41009, Seville, Spain. Electronic address: maserrera@us.es.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of bone type in terms of bone density and cortical bone thickness, on the stresses induced by two implants under compressive and oblique loads. METHODS: A numerical simulation technique based on the finite element method was applied. Two implant types (M-12 and Astra Tech) were introduced in a model matrix whose geometry was extracted from a real CBCT radiograph of the posterior mandibular region. The Young's module and Poisson's coefficient of the bone qualities described by Misch were calculated. Loads with amplitude of 400 N were exerted in two directions: compressive and 15° oblique to 5 mm above the uppermost part of the implant. RESULTS: The von Misses variant was analysed. Both implant types presented greater tension in the cortical bone area than in the trabecular bone region under compressive loading. For the oblique load condition, the stresses obtained in the cortical zone were significantly higher than those registered as a consequence of compressive loads in both implant types. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of bone type, the M-12 implants presented lower tensions in the cortical bone than did the Astra implants. The tensions recorded for D3 and D4 bone types in the trabecular zone surrounding the M-12 implants were greater than those recorded for the Astra implants. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: For both compressive and oblique loads, good mechanical behaviour was observed. The decrease in bone quality determines a worse stress distribution, and the cortical bone is overloaded. An efficient distribution of the forces may increase the implants' longevity.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of bone type in terms of bone density and cortical bone thickness, on the stresses induced by two implants under compressive and oblique loads. METHODS: A numerical simulation technique based on the finite element method was applied. Two implant types (M-12 and Astra Tech) were introduced in a model matrix whose geometry was extracted from a real CBCT radiograph of the posterior mandibular region. The Young's module and Poisson's coefficient of the bone qualities described by Misch were calculated. Loads with amplitude of 400 N were exerted in two directions: compressive and 15° oblique to 5 mm above the uppermost part of the implant. RESULTS: The von Misses variant was analysed. Both implant types presented greater tension in the cortical bone area than in the trabecular bone region under compressive loading. For the oblique load condition, the stresses obtained in the cortical zone were significantly higher than those registered as a consequence of compressive loads in both implant types. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of bone type, the M-12 implants presented lower tensions in the cortical bone than did the Astra implants. The tensions recorded for D3 and D4 bone types in the trabecular zone surrounding the M-12 implants were greater than those recorded for the Astra implants. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: For both compressive and oblique loads, good mechanical behaviour was observed. The decrease in bone quality determines a worse stress distribution, and the cortical bone is overloaded. An efficient distribution of the forces may increase the implants' longevity.