Literature DB >> 31255592

Comparative evaluation of the extraction and analysis of urinary phospholipids and lysophospholipids using MALDI-TOF/MS.

Xin Li1, Kenji Nakayama2, Takayuki Goto3, Shusuke Akamatsu1, Koji Shimizu4, Osamu Ogawa1, Takahiro Inoue1.   

Abstract

Lipids, particularly phospholipids (PLs) and lysophospholipids (LPLs), are attracting increasing scientific interest for their biological functions in cells and their potential as disease biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and several types of cancer. Urinary PLs and LPLs could be ideal clinical biomarkers, because urine can be collected easily and noninvasively. However, due to their very low concentrations in urine compared with the relatively large quantity of contaminants in this matrix, efficient extraction and sensitive detection are required for analyzing urinary PLs and LPLs. In this study, various methods for analyzing PLs and LPLs in urine were compared and optimized from a clinical perspective. An optimized lipid extraction method and a matrix for matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS) were established using two external ionization standards and an internal standard mix containing 13 human urinary lipids. 9-Aminoacridine (9-AA) was a useful and effective matrix for the MALDI-TOF/MS analysis of all the internal standard lipids in both positive and negative ion modes. However, it was necessary to determine the proportional lipid concentrations from the balance between the extracted lipid and the matrix. The extraction efficiency and reproducibility of the acidified Bligh and Dyer method were excellent for both positively and negatively charged lipids. Analysis of small volumes of urine was the most efficient with the 9-AA MALDI matrix at concentrations of or below 5 mM. The combined analytical procedures allowed rapid and comprehensive screening of low concentrations of PLs and LPLs in clinical samples.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comprehensive screening; Diagnosis; Lipid; MALDI-TOF/MS; Quantitative analysis; Urine

Year:  2019        PMID: 31255592     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2019.104787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids        ISSN: 0009-3084            Impact factor:   3.329


  5 in total

Review 1.  A narrative review of urinary phospholipids: from biochemical aspect towards clinical application.

Authors:  Xin Li; Kenji Nakayama; Takayuki Goto; Shusuke Akamatsu; Takashi Kobayashi; Koji Shimizu; Osamu Ogawa; Takahiro Inoue
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

2.  Data processing on a comparative evaluation of the extraction and analysis procedures for urinary phospholipid and lysophospholipid using MALDI-TOF/MS.

Authors:  Xin Li; Kenji Nakayama; Takayuki Goto; Shusuke Akamatsu; Koji Shimizu; Osamu Ogawa; Takahiro Inoue
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-07-15

3.  Fatty Acid Composition of the Lipids from Atlantic Salmon-Comparison of Two Extraction Methods without Halogenated Solvents.

Authors:  Jordan T Nechev; Guro K Edvinsen; Karl-Erik Eilertsen
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 4.  MALDI-TOF/MS Analysis of Non-Invasive Human Urine and Saliva Samples for the Identification of New Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Carlo Zambonin; Antonella Aresta
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Designing Nanoparticle-based Drug Delivery Systems for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Jianhua Yang; Chengyou Jia; Jianshe Yang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.