Literature DB >> 31255212

Multicenter Investigation of Fungal Infections of Inflatable Penile Prostheses.

Martin S Gross1, Lael Reinstatler2, Gerard D Henry3, Stanton C Honig4, Peter J Stahl5, Arthur L Burnett6, Pedro P Maria7, Nelson E Bennett8, Bruce R Kava9, Tobias S Kohler10, Jonathan A Beilan11, Rafael E Carrion12, Ricardo M Munarriz13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections of inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs) are inadequately understood in the literature. AIM: To review a multi-institution database of IPP infections to examine for common patient and surgical factors related to IPP fungal infections.
METHODS: This is a retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved analysis of 217 patients at 26 institutions who underwent salvage or device explant between 2001 and 2018. Patient data were compiled after an extensive record review. OUTCOMES: 26 patients (12%) with fungal infections were identified.
RESULTS: 23 of 26 patients (83%) with a fungal IPP infection were either diabetic or overweight. 15 patients had undergone primary IPP implantation, and the other 11 had previously undergone an average of 1.7 IPP-related surgeries (range 1-3; median 2). The average age at implantation was 63 years (range 31-92; median 63). 18 of the 26 patients with fungal infection had diabetes (69%), with a mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value of 8.4 (range 5.8-13.3; median 7.5). Twenty-two patients (85%) were overweight or obese. The mean body mass index for all patients was 30.1 kg/m2 (range 23.7-45 kg/m2; median 28.4 kg/m2), and that for diabetic patients was 30.8 kg/m2 (range 24.1-45 kg/m2, median 29.7 kg/m2). Ninety-one percent of implants were placed with intravenous antibiotics, consistent with current American Urological Association guidelines: an aminoglycoside plus first- or second-generation cephalosporin or vancomycin or ampicillin/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam. 65% (17 of 26) of infected IPPs had only fungal growth in culture. No patient had concomitant immunosuppressive disease or recent antibiotic exposure before IPP implantation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: More than two-thirds of the fungal infections occurred in diabetic patients and 85% occurred in overweight or obese patients, suggesting that antifungal prophylaxis may be appropriate in these patients. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This is the largest series of fungal infections reported to date in the penile prosthesis literature. The overall number of such cases, however, remains small.
CONCLUSION: Fungal infections represent 12% of all penile prosthesis infections in our series and were seen mostly in diabetic or overweight patients, who may benefit from antifungal prophylaxis. Gross MS, Reinstatler L, Henry GD, et al. Multicenter Investigation of Fungal Infections of Inflatable Penile Prostheses. J Sex Med 2019;16:1100-1105.
Copyright © 2019 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida; Fungus; Infection; Penile Prosthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31255212     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  5 in total

Review 1.  Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kevin Krughoff; Priyanka Bearelly; Michel Apoj; Nicolas A Munarriz; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Shu Pan; Martin S Gross; Ricardo M Munarriz
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature.

Authors:  Bryce A Baird; Kevin Parikh; Gregory Broderick
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

Review 3.  A scoping review of penile implant biofilms-what do we know and what remains unknown?

Authors:  Joon Yau Leong; Courtney E Capella; Maria J D'Amico; Selin Isguven; Caroline Purtill; Priscilla Machado; Lauren J Delaney; Gerard D Henry; Noreen J Hickok; Flemming Forsberg; Paul H Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-08

Review 4.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

5.  Penile Implant Infection: Experience With Expanded Salvage Criteria and a Shortened Course of Postoperative Antibiotics.

Authors:  Jason Chandrapal; Shelby Harper; Leah G Davis; Aaron C Lentz
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.491

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.