Literature DB >> 31254655

Antibiotic use and duration in association with Clostridioides difficile infection in a tertiary academic medical center: A retrospective case-control study.

Abrar K Thabit1, Christy A Varugehese2, Alexander R Levine2.   

Abstract

Previous literature has attributed the use of certain antibiotics to Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI); however, the time from administration to CDI onset is not adequately evaluated. We aimed to determine the type of antibiotics and duration of therapy associated with the highest CDI incidence at a tertiary academic medical center. This was a retrospective, case-control study of adult inpatients who received at least one course of antibiotic treatment. Patients were divided into either cases or controls. For cases, their first episode of CDI was a determining factor. Primary outcome were the types of antibiotics associated with risk of CDI development and the median time of antibiotic usage defining this risk. Of 601 patients who developed CDI, 313 were included as cases while 150 of 291 who received antibiotics but did not develop CDI were included as controls. Cefepime and cefazolin were significantly associated with increased risk for CDI with odds ratios of 3.01 (95% CI, 1.96-4.65; P < 0.001) and 1.71 (95% CI, 1.02-2.95; P < 0.05), respectively. Cefepime was associated with CDI after a median time of 8 days while CDI may have occurred after 6 days of therapy with cefazolin. Use of antineoplastic agents was significantly associated with CDI (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.35-4.13; P < 0.01). Antibiotic use increased the risk of CDI, particularly with cefepime and cefazolin with a median time to incidence of 8 and 6 days, respectively. CDI risk was also increased with the use of antineoplastic agents.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Antineoplastics; Cefazolin; Cefepime; Clostridioides difficile infection

Year:  2019        PMID: 31254655     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  6 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of three current Clostridioides difficile infection guidelines: IDSA/SHEA, ESCMID, and ACG guidelines.

Authors:  Abrar K Thabit; Mawadah H Alsolami; Nojoud A Baghlaf; Raghad M Alsharekh; Hadeel A Almazmumi; Afrah S Alselami; Fatmah A Alsubhi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Intraoperative bile spillage as a risk factor for surgical site infection: a propensity score-matched NSQIP analysis.

Authors:  Dylan Russell; Freeman Condon; William Cole; Sherry Wren; Christopher Yheulon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Machine learning analysis to identify the association between risk factors and onset of nosocomial diarrhea: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ken Kurisu; Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi; Kei Ogino; Toshimi Oda
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Characteristics of patients infected with Clostridioides difficile at a Saudi Tertiary Academic Medical Center and assessment of antibiotic duration.

Authors:  Khadijah M Alammari; Abrar K Thabit
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.181

5.  Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Prevalence of Clostridioides difficile Among Hospitalized Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.

Authors:  Abdallah Damin Abukhalil; Liana AbuKhdeir; Malak Hamed; Ni'meh Al Shami; Hani A Naseef; Banan M Aiesh; Ali Sabateen
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Clostridium difficile infection in an academic medical center in Saudi Arabia: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Mai Alalawi; Seba Aljahdali; Bashaer Alharbi; Lana Fagih; Raghad Fatani; Ohoud Aljuhani
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.