Literature DB >> 31254618

Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA.

Victoria Leclercq1, Charlotte Beaudart2, Sara Ajamieh2, Véronique Rabenda2, Ezio Tirelli3, Olivier Bruyère2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of the explicit mention of PRISMA, a statement designed to help authors report meta-analyses (MAs), on the reporting completeness of MAs. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Two investigators evaluated a random sample of 206 MAs indexed in PsycINFO in 2016; 100 explicitly mentioned PRISMA and 106 did not. Two authors independently evaluated the 27 PRISMA items and extracted factors that could potentially be associated with reporting completeness. The data were analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS: Among our 206 MAs, perfect adherence to PRISMA was found in less than 4%, of which 87% explicitly followed PRISMA. The following items were encountered significantly more frequently in MAs that explicitly mentioned PRISMA than in those that did not: summary, protocol, information sources, search strategy, study characteristics, results of individual studies, funding, study selection, risk of bias in individual studies, and bias across studies. The journal's impact factor, endorsement of PRISMA by the journal, number of authors, country of author, open access, and design of the included studies were significantly and positively associated with the explicit mention of PRISMA.
CONCLUSIONS: Even if far from optimal, the explicit mention of PRISMA has a positive influence on the reporting completeness of MAs from PsycINFO.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Completeness; Meta-analysis; Meta-research; PRISMA statement; Reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31254618     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

1.  Conducting integrative reviews: a guide for novice nursing researchers.

Authors:  Shannon Dhollande; Annabel Taylor; Silke Meyer; Mark Scott
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2021-08-05

2.  Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.

Authors:  Esther Maassen; Marcel A L M van Assen; Michèle B Nuijten; Anton Olsson-Collentine; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-29

4.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-29

6.  The dissemination of brain imaging guidelines and recommendations.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Pradeep Singh; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  IBRO Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-12-02

7.  Methodological quality of meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO: leads for enhancements: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Victoria Leclercq; Charlotte Beaudart; Sara Ajamieh; Ezio Tirelli; Olivier Bruyère
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katja Matthias; Olesja Rissling; Dawid Pieper; Johannes Morche; Marc Nocon; Anja Jacobs; Uta Wegewitz; Jaqueline Schirm; Robert C Lorenz
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.