Literature DB >> 31254488

Are we ready to close the discussion on the interchangeability of biosimilars?

Hans C Ebbers1, Huub Schellekens2.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of the first biosimilar the discussion about their interchangeability has persisted. The body of evidence gathered for biosimilars provides reassurance that they are approved based on a rigorous comparability exercise and do not show clinically meaningful differences to their reference products. There are no data suggesting that the risk of switching to a biosimilar in terms of increased immunogenicity is greater than switching between two batches of any biologic. The key concern around switching biosimilars is the nocebo effect, which reinforces the need for physician involvement when switching. Whereas this might argue against automatic substitution of biosimilars, it is not a biosimilars-specific concern. To increase physician confidence in biosimilars, regulators should acknowledge that biosimilars are interchangeable.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31254488     DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Automatic Substitution of Biosimilars: Definitions of Interchangeability are not Interchangeable.

Authors:  Anita Afzali; Daniel Furtner; Richard Melsheimer; Philip J Molloy
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Biosimilar-to-Biosimilar Switching: What is the Rationale and Current Experience?

Authors:  Eduardo Mysler; Valderilio Feijó Azevedo; Silvio Danese; Daniel Alvarez; Noriko Iikuni; Beverly Ingram; Markus Mueller; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Safety, Immunogenicity and Interchangeability of Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies and Fusion Proteins: A Regulatory Perspective.

Authors:  Pekka Kurki; Sean Barry; Ingrid Bourges; Panagiota Tsantili; Elena Wolff-Holz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Regulatory Information and Guidance on Biosimilars and Their Use Across Europe: A Call for Strengthened One Voice Messaging.

Authors:  Liese Barbier; Allary Mbuaki; Steven Simoens; Paul Declerck; Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 5.  Regulatory aspects of biological medicines in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Authors:  Biljana Tubić; Saša Jungić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 6.  Treatment journey in rheumatoid arthritis with biosimilars: from better access to good disease control through cost savings and prevention of nocebo effects.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Roberto Caporali; Thomas Doerner; Bruno Fautrel; Fabrizio Benedetti; Burkhard Pieper; Minjun Jang
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-06

7.  Safety of switching between rituximab biosimilars in onco-hematology.

Authors:  Silvana A M Urru; Stefania Spila Alegiani; Anna Guella; Giuseppe Traversa; Annalisa Campomori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Considerations for the US health-system pharmacist in a world of biosimilars.

Authors:  Andrea Zlatkus; Todd Bixby; Kavitha Goyal
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2020-02-25

Review 9.  Interchangeability of Biosimilars: What Level of Clinical Evidence is Needed to Support the Interchangeability Designation in the United States?

Authors:  Daniel F Alvarez; Gertjan Wolbink; Carol Cronenberger; John Orazem; Jonathan Kay
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.807

10.  Biosimilar Uptake: The Importance of Healthcare Provider Education.

Authors:  Sonia Tadjalli Oskouei; Andrew R Kusmierczyk
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2021-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.