PURPOSE: Most elderly patients with colorectal cancer have comorbidities and reduced functional reserve, which may increase their risks of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and subsequently influence the treatment choice. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the treatment choice and compare laparoscopic and open surgery in this setting. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with colorectal cancer (≥ 85 years old between January 2007 and February 2018) to determine the influence of comorbidities on treatment choice, as well as the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for these patients. RESULTS: The patients included 42 men (35.6%) and 106 patients (89.8%) with comorbidities. The treatments were curative resection for 90 patients and palliative surgery for 16 patients, including 5 cases of colostomy/ileostomy because of the difficulty of primary cancer resection, pneumonia, or pulmonary hypertension. Twelve patients received non-surgical treatment, including 7 patients with decreased respiratory function because of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia. Forty-three patients underwent open curative resection and 47 patients underwent laparoscopic curative resection, which was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (14 days vs. 19days, P < 0.01), a lower morbidity rate (17.0% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.035), and less blood loss (10 mL vs. 140 mL, P < 0.01). One patient in each group died during the postoperative period because of worsened pre-existing pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery was safer and less invasive than open surgery for colorectal cancer among ≥ 85-year-old patients. Pulmonary comorbidities affected the choice of non-curative surgery and may be related to the risk of postoperative mortality.
PURPOSE: Most elderly patients with colorectal cancer have comorbidities and reduced functional reserve, which may increase their risks of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and subsequently influence the treatment choice. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the treatment choice and compare laparoscopic and open surgery in this setting. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with colorectal cancer (≥ 85 years old between January 2007 and February 2018) to determine the influence of comorbidities on treatment choice, as well as the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for these patients. RESULTS: The patients included 42 men (35.6%) and 106 patients (89.8%) with comorbidities. The treatments were curative resection for 90 patients and palliative surgery for 16 patients, including 5 cases of colostomy/ileostomy because of the difficulty of primary cancer resection, pneumonia, or pulmonary hypertension. Twelve patients received non-surgical treatment, including 7 patients with decreased respiratory function because of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia. Forty-three patients underwent open curative resection and 47 patients underwent laparoscopic curative resection, which was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (14 days vs. 19days, P < 0.01), a lower morbidity rate (17.0% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.035), and less blood loss (10 mL vs. 140 mL, P < 0.01). One patient in each group died during the postoperative period because of worsened pre-existing pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery was safer and less invasive than open surgery for colorectal cancer among ≥ 85-year-old patients. Pulmonary comorbidities affected the choice of non-curative surgery and may be related to the risk of postoperative mortality.
Authors: Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Anna Maria Platon; Rune Erichsen; Christian Fynbo Christiansen; Lea Kjær Andersen; Claus Sværke; Jonathan Montomoli; Henrik Toft Sørensen Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2014-07-01
Authors: Ianthe Boden; Elizabeth H Skinner; Laura Browning; Julie Reeve; Lesley Anderson; Cat Hill; Iain K Robertson; David Story; Linda Denehy Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-01-24