Literature DB >> 31254007

Regional muscle changes in adult dysfunctional hip conditions of femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia.

Majid Chalian1, Natalie Schauwecker1, Anthony Cai1, Riham Dessouky1, Nicholas Fey1, Yin Xi1, Avneesh Chhabra2, Joel Wells3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze regional muscle CT density and bulk in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia (HD) versus controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who obtained perioperative CT imaging for FAI and HD before surgery were retrospectively studied. Asymptomatic controls included for comparison. Two readers independently evaluated regional hip muscle [iliopsoas (IP), rectus femoris (RF), gluteus minimus (Gm), and medius (GM)] density, muscle area, and muscle circumference. Inter-observer reliability calculated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: A consecutive series of 25 FAI patients, 16 HD patients, and 38 controls were recruited in the study. FAI patients had significantly greater Gm and GM circumferences as well as greater RF and IP areas on the normal side compared to the asymptomatic control group (p values 0.004, 0.032, 0.033, and 0.028, respectively). In addition, Gm and RF circumferences and RF area were significantly larger (p values 0.029, 0.036, and 0.014, respectively) in FAI patients on the affected side compared to the control group. HD patients had significantly smaller Gm and GM circumferences on the affected side than normal side measurements in FAI group (p values 0.043 and 0.003, respectively). Normal side GM circumference was also smaller in HD patients than normal side FAI hips (p value 0.02). There was no significant difference between the measurements on normal and abnormal sides in each disease group. No significant difference was found between measurements of HD compared to controls (p > 0.05). No muscle density differences were seen among different groups. There was moderate to excellent inter-reader reliability for all measurements except Gm muscle density.
CONCLUSIONS: Muscle analysis was able to quantify differences among patients with FAI, HD, and asymptomatic controls. These changes could indicate either a muscle imbalance contributing to the pathology or disuse atrophy, which may have implications for specific muscle-strengthening therapies and rehabilitation procedures in such patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip dysplasia; Hip pain; Skeletal muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31254007     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03263-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  3 in total

1.  What happens to the gluteus medius in young and middle-aged patients with hip dysplasia?

Authors:  Lixin Chen; Yunlong Wu; Zhenqiu Chen; Chi Zhou; Yinuo Fan; Zhongfeng Li; Minghai Chen; Jiahao Zhang; Yupeng Liang; Zhiming Wei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The biomechanical disadvantage of dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Molly C Shepherd; Ke Song; Brecca M M Gaffney; Travis J Hillen; Marcie Harris-Hayes; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.102

3.  Functional outcomes are preserved in adult acetabular dysplasia with radiographic evidence of lumbosacral spine anomalies: an investigation in hip-spine syndrome.

Authors:  Aaron Shi; Joshua Sun; Avneesh Chhabra; Uma Thakur; Yin Xi; Ajay Kohli; Joel Wells
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.