| Literature DB >> 31253992 |
Michael J Paulsen1, Jung Hwa Bae2, Annabel M Imbrie-Moore3, Hanjay Wang1, Camille E Hironaka1, Justin M Farry1, Haley Lucian1, Akshara D Thakore1, Mark R Cutkosky2, Y Joseph Woo4.
Abstract
Few technologies exist that can provide quantitative data on forces within the mitral valve apparatus. Marker-based strain measurements can be performed, but chordal geometry and restricted optical access are limitations. Foil-based strain sensors have been described and work well, but the sensor footprint limits the number of chordae that can be measured. We instead utilized fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors-optical strain gauges made of 125 μm diameter silica fibers-to overcome some limitations of previous methods of measuring chordae tendineae forces. Using FBG sensors, we created a force-sensing neochord (FSN) that mimics the natural shape and movement of native chordae. FBG sensors reflect a specific wavelength of light depending on the spatial period of gratings. When force is applied, the gratings move relative to one another, shifting the wavelength of reflected light. This shift is directly proportional to force applied. The FBG sensors were housed in a protective sheath fashioned from a 0.025 in. flat coil, and attached to the chordae using polytetrafluoroethylene suture. The function of the force-sensing neochordae was validated in a three-dimensional (3D)-printed left heart simulator, which demonstrated that FBG sensors provide highly sensitive force measurements of mitral valve chordae at a temporal resolution of 1000 Hz. As ventricular pressures increased, such as in hypertension, chordae forces also increased. Overall, FBG sensors are a viable, durable, and high-fidelity sensing technology that can be effectively used to measure mitral valve chordae forces and overcome some limitations of other such technologies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31253992 PMCID: PMC7104756 DOI: 10.1115/1.4044142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech Eng ISSN: 0148-0731 Impact factor: 2.097
Fig. 1Principles of fiber Bragg grating operation (a) demonstrating wavelength shift when tensile or compressive force applied. Initial prototype (b) with PTFE suture tied and glued directly to a naked fiber proximal and distal to the FBG. Second prototype (c) whereby suture-holding flanges are created with furcation tubing glued to the fiber, leaving small gaps proximal and distal to the fiber; suture are not glued directly to the fiber for easier reuse. Final prototype (d) where FBG is secured inside of an expanded flat coil, which serves to capture suture similar to a flange design but with a lower profile and more protection of the fiber. (e) Schematic of calibration setup using known weights. (f) Example calibration plot relating force in Newton to the change in wavelength.
Fig. 2Diagram of the left heart simulator (a) with each component labeled. Mitral valve tacked onto silicone sewing ring [43] (Reprinted with permission from Elsevier copyright 2019) ((b) and (c)) with interrupted sutures to obtain proper alignment. Final prototype of FSN implanted onto a mitral valve chordae tendineae (d) with the green arrow denoting the FSN, white arrowsdenoting the PTFE sutures attaching the chordae to the FSN proximally and distally to the sensor, and the orange arrow denoting the instrumented chordae. En face view of valves during diastole and systole ((e) and (f)). Lateral profile view of valves during diastole and systole ((g) and (h)). TEE: transesophageal echocardiography, FBG: fiber Bragg grating, APM: anterolateral papillary muscle, PPM: posteromedial papillary muscle, AL: anterior leaflet, and PL: posterior leaflet.
Fig. 3Pressure tracings at baseline (a) and during hypertensive conditions (b) demonstrating physiologic characteristics. Flow tracings at baseline (c) and during hypertensive conditions (d).
Hemodynamic and chordae tendineae tension parameters
| Baseline | Hypertension | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamics | |||
| Annular diameter (mm) | 32.00 ± 1.41 | 32.40 ± 1.67 | 0.621 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 70.00 ± 0.00 | 70.00 ± 0.00 | 1.000 |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 99.41 ± 0.96 | 135.78 ± 1.90 |
|
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 78.75 ± 1.84 | 114.06 ± 2.24 |
|
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 120.79 ± 1.07 | 158.21 ± 2.94 |
|
| Mean atrial pressure (mmHg) | 6.54 ± 1.17 | 5.66 ± 1.29 | 0.365 |
| Mean ventricular pressure (mmHg) | 50.11 ± 0.91 | 62.41 ± 1.79 |
|
| Cardiac output (liters/min) | 4.55 ± 0.18 | 4.03 ± 0.21 |
|
| Effective stroke volume (ml) | 64.99 ± 2.62 | 57.63 ± 2.99 |
|
| Pump stroke volume (ml) | 109.74 ± 0.03 | 109.72 ± 0.05 | 0.466 |
| Mitral valve mean gradient (mmHg) | 4.85 ± 1.23 | 8.53 ± 0.64 |
|
| Mitral valve mean back pressure (mmHg) | 107.97 ± 3.99 | 143.38 ± 4.89 |
|
| Mitral forward flow time (s) | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 0.200 |
| Mitral forward volume (ml/cycle) | 69.90 ± 1.60 | 63.36 ± 2.12 |
|
| Mitral mean instantaneous flow (ml/cycle) | 112.77 ± 2.60 | 101.06 ± 3.31 |
|
| Mitral RMS instantaneous flow (ml/cycle) | 156.97 ± 4.45 | 143.70 ± 5.11 |
|
| Mitral peak instantaneous flow (ml/cycle) | 427.02 ± 15.28 | 402.09 ± 17.03 |
|
| Effective orifice area (cm2) | 8.56 ± 2.09 | 8.57 ± 2.38 | 0.960 |
| Mitral valve regurgitant fraction (%) | 7.05 ± 2.25 | 9.06 ± 2.61 |
|
| Mitral valve leakage rate (ml/s) | 0.22 ± 3.11 | 2.56 ± 3.37 |
|
| Mitral valve leakage volume (ml/cycle) | 0.07 ± 0.89 | 0.70 ± 0.93 |
|
| Mitral valve closing volume (ml/cycle) | 4.98 ± 0.84 | 5.02 ± 0.85 | 0.403 |
| Ventricular energy (mJ) | 1156.21 ± 60.71 | 1460.02 ± 94.98 |
|
| Transmitral forward energy loss (mJ) | 0.42 ± 5.63 | −4.37 ± 6.79 |
|
| Transmitral closing energy loss (mJ) | 26.97 ± 3.69 | 27.03 ± 3.75 | 0.867 |
| Transmitral leakage energy loss (mJ) | 1.18 ± 12.71 | 15.60 ± 17.84 |
|
| Transmitral total energy loss (mJ) | 28.57 ± 18.42 | 38.27 ± 24.57 | 0.078 |
| Chordae tendineae forces | |||
| Anterior primary (N) | 0.17 ± 0.08 | 0.23 ± 0.11 |
|
| Anterior secondary (N) | 0.74 ± 0.22 | 1.02 ± 0.38 |
|
| Posterior primary (N) | 0.12 ± 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.07 |
|
| Posterior secondary (N) | 0.60 ± 0.26 | 0.78 ± 0.30 |
|
Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. RMS: root mean square. Bold denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Fig. 4Chordae tendineae force tracings at baseline (a) and during hypertensive conditions (b) demonstrating high fidelity force readings at a temporal resolution of 1000 Hz. Secondary chordae appeared to increase more significantly in response to increases in pressure.