Literature DB >> 31253053

Alternative Conversion Methods for Transition Probabilities in State-Transition Models: Validity and Impact on Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness.

Beate Jahn1, Christina Kurzthaler1,2, Jagpreet Chhatwal3, Elamin H Elbasha4, Annette Conrads-Frank1, Ursula Rochau1, Gaby Sroczynski1, Christoph Urach5, Marvin Bundo1, Niki Popper5,6,7, Uwe Siebert1,3,8.   

Abstract

Background. In state-transition models (STMs), decision problems are conceptualized using health states and transitions among those health states after predefined time cycles. The naive, commonly applied method (C) for cycle length conversion transforms all transition probabilities separately. In STMs with more than 2 health states, this method is not accurate. Therefore, we aim to describe and compare the performance of method C with that of alternative matrix transformation methods. Design. We compare 2 alternative matrix transformation methods (Eigenvalue method [E], Schure-Padé method [SP]) to method C applied in an STM of 3 different treatment strategies for women with breast cancer. We convert the given annual transition matrix into a monthly-cycle matrix and evaluate induced transformation errors for the transition matrices and the long-term outcomes: life years, quality-adjusted life-years, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and the performance related to the decisions. In addition, we applied these transformation methods to randomly generated annual transition matrices with 4, 7, 10, and 20 health states. Results. In theory, there is no generally applicable correct transformation method. Based on our simulations, SP resulted in the smallest transformation-induced discrepancies for generated annual transition matrices for 2 treatment strategies. E showed slightly smaller discrepancies than SP in the strategy, where one of the direct transitions between health states was excluded. For long-term outcomes, the largest discrepancy occurred for estimated costs applying method C. For higher dimensional models, E performs best. Conclusions. In our modeling examples, matrix transformations (E, SP) perform better than transforming all transition probabilities separately (C). Transition probabilities based on alternative conversion methods should therefore be applied in sensitivity analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conversion transition probability; cost-effectiveness analysis; markov model; markov transition matrix; state-transition model

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31253053     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19851095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Decision Modeling Approaches for Health Technology and Policy Evaluation.

Authors:  John Graves; Shawn Garbett; Zilu Zhou; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Josh Peterson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.749

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.