| Literature DB >> 31252675 |
Ana R Bastos1,2, Lucília P da Silva1,2, F Raquel Maia3,4,5, Sandra Pina1,2, Tânia Rodrigues1,2, Filipa Sousa1,2, Joaquim M Oliveira1,2,6, Jillian Cornish7, Vitor M Correlo1,2,6, Rui L Reis1,2,6.
Abstract
The development of bioactive and cell-responsive materials has fastened the field of bone tissue engineering. Gellan gum (GG) spongy-like hydrogels present high attractive properties for the tissue engineering field, especially due to their wide microarchitecture and tunable mechanical properties, as well as their ability to entrap the responsive cells. Lactoferrin (Lf) and Hydroxyapatite (HAp) are bioactive factors that are known to potentiate faster bone regeneration. Thus, we developed an advanced three-dimensional (3D) biomaterial by integrating these bioactive factors within GG spongy-like hydrogels. Lf-HAp spongy-like hydrogels were characterized in terms of microstructure, water uptake, degradation, and concomitant release of Lf along the time. Human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) were seeded and the capacity of these materials to support hASCs in culture for 21 days was assessed. Lf addition within GG spongy-like hydrogels did not change the main features of GG spongy-like hydrogels in terms of porosity, pore size, degradation, and water uptake commitment. Nevertheless, HAp addition promoted an increase of the pore wall thickness (from ~13 to 28 µm) and a decrease on porosity (from ~87% to 64%) and mean pore size (from ~12 to 20 µm), as well as on the degradability and water retention capabilities. A sustained release of Lf was observed for all the formulations up to 30 days. Cell viability assays showed that hASCs were viable during the culture period regarding cell-laden spongy-like hydrogels. Altogether, we demonstrate that GG spongy-like hydrogels containing HAp and Lf in high concentrations gathered favorable 3D bone-like microenvironment with an increased hASCs viability with the presented results.Entities:
Keywords: bone biomaterials; gellan gum; hydroxyapatite; lactoferrin
Year: 2019 PMID: 31252675 PMCID: PMC6651619 DOI: 10.3390/ma12132074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Different formulations of Gellan Gum (GG) spongy-like hydrogels with or without Lactoferrin (Lf), and/or Hydroxyapatite (HAp).
| Name | GG % (w/v) | Lf % (w/v) | HAp % (w/v) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.25 | - | - |
|
| 1.25 | 0.05 | - |
|
| 1.25 | 0.15 | - |
|
| 1.25 | - | 1.00 |
|
| 1.25 | - | 10.00 |
|
| 1.25 | 0.05 | 1.00 |
|
| 1.25 | 0.15 | 1.00 |
|
| 1.25 | 0.05 | 10.00 |
|
| 1.25 | 0.15 | 10.00 |
Figure 1Fourier Transformed Infrared (FTIR) spectra of GG/Lf/HAp spongy-like hydrogels: (i) GG, (ii) GG/Low Lf, (iii) GG/High Lf, (iv) GG/Low HAp, (v) GG/High HAp, (vi) GG/Low Lf/Low HAp, (vii) GG/High Lf/Low HAp, (viii) GG/Low Lf/High HAp, and (ix) GG/High Lf/High HAp.
Figure 2X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns of the GG/Lf/HAp spongy-like hydrogels: (i) GG, (ii) GG/Low Lf, (iii) GG/High Lf, (iv) GG/Low HAp, (v) GG/High HAp, (vi) GG/Low Lf/Low HAp, (vii) GG/High Lf/Low HAp, (viii) GG/Low Lf/High HAp and (ix) GG/High Lf/High HAp. HAp (ICDD PDF 01-074-0565), and * GG.
Figure 3SEM representative images of GG dried polymeric networks (DPN) with or without Lactoferrin (Lf) and/or Hydroxyapatite (HAp): (A) GG, (B) GG/Low Lf, (C) GG/High Lf, (D) GG/Low HAp, (E) GG/High HAp, (F) GG/Low Lf/Low HAp, (G) GG/High Lf/Low HAp, (H) GG/Low Lf/High HAp, and (I) GG/High Lf/High HAp.
Micro computed tomography (Micro-CT) analysis of (A) mean porosity, (B) pore size, and (C) wall thickness of GG dried polymeric networks (DPN) with or without Lf and/or HAp. Data was presented as mean ± stdev, the statistical analysis was performed using a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test, in which all formulations were compared between them.
| Name | Porosity (%) | Pore Size (µm) | Wall Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 86.5 ± 1.34 | 73.18 ± 12.92 | 12,83 ± 0.87 |
|
| 86.01 ± 1.81 | 73.14 ± 5.37 | 13.21 ± 0.14 |
|
| 86.98 ± 1.97 | 68.85 ± 0.93 | 13.45 ± 1.31 |
|
| 78.44 ± 1.37 | 55.23 ± 5.22 | 17.43 ± 0.21 |
|
| 64.45 ± 3.79 | 42.80 ± 5.73 | 20.17 ± 0.66 |
|
| 81.30 ± 0.64 | 63.30 ± 3.66 | 16.07 ± 0.42 |
|
| 84.14 ± 3.21 | 79.06 ± 15.31 | 16.48 ± 0.62 |
|
| 67.98 ± 0.55 | 59.96 ± 3.53 | 27.95 ± 1.66 |
|
| 71.22 ± 2.96 | 59.74 ± 2.00 | 25.66 ± 1.72 |
Figure 4Two-dimensional (2D) images of the dried polymer networks of GG/Lf/HAp spongy-like hydrogels obtained by Micro-CT.
Figure 5(A) Water uptake profile of dried polymeric networks (DPN) along 72 h (B) water content after 72 h. Data was presented as mean ± stdev and statistical analysis was performed while using a Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test.
Figure 6Degradation and Lf release analysis. Final mass of dried polymeric networks after 30 days (A). Lf release profile of Lf-HAp containing spongy-like hydrogels along 30 days (B) and at day 30 (C). The statistical analysis of the final mass was performed using a One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons T-test, while the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test was used for Lf release and all the formulations were compared between them.
Figure 7Representative images of cytoskeleton morphology (Phalloidin-TRITC, red) and nuclei (DAPI,blue) of hASCs within GG/High Lf/High HAp spongy-like hydrogels after (A) three and (B) 21 days of culture.
Figure 8Cell viability assessment. (A) Metabolic activity of hASCs’ normalized by Day 1 after 21 days of culture. (B) DNA concentration of hASCs’ within spongy-like hydrogels after 21 days. The statistical analysis was performed using a One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons T-test and results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and the significance level between groups was set for: * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01.