Literature DB >> 31252408

Relationship between BRAF V600E and clinical features in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Changjiao Yan1, Meiling Huang1, Xin Li1, Ting Wang1, Rui Ling1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mutant status of BRAF gene and analyze its relationship to epidemiological risk factors and clinical outcomes among patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) in the largest, single-institution Chinese cohort to date.
METHODS: The medical records of 2048 PTC patients were reviewed in this retrospective study. Single-factor and multiple logistic regression analyses were applied to identify risk factors for BRAF V600E mutation. Survival outcomes including distant metastatic and persistent or recurrent PTC were examined, with a mean follow-up time of 23.4 (5-47) months.
RESULTS: The BRAF V600E mutation was present in 83.7% of patients (1715 of 2048). Correlation was found between BRAF V600E mutation and several epidemiological features, including age, concomitant hypertension and Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT). For the clinicopathological features, BRAF V600E was significantly associated with bilateral multifocality (odds ratio (OR) 1.233, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.063-1.431, P < 0.01) and less lateral lymph node metastases (OR 0.496, 95% CI 0.357-0.689, P < 0.01). Smaller tumor size and advanced disease stage were significant in single-factor analyses but became insignificant after multivariate adjustment. No association was found between BRAF V600E mutation and extrathyroidal invasion, distant metastatic and disease persistence or recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Part of epidemiological features are independent risk or protective factors for BRAF V600E mutation. The presence of BRAF V600E mutation is not an aggressive prognosis on poor clinical outcomes in PTC. However, the high prevalence of BRAF V600E may provide guidance for surgery strategy and opportunity for targeted treatment in recurrent and advanced stage disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF V600E; clinicopathological features; epidemiological features; papillary thyroid cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31252408      PMCID: PMC6652244          DOI: 10.1530/EC-19-0246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Connect        ISSN: 2049-3614            Impact factor:   3.335


Introduction

Thyroid cancer, especially papillary subtype, is the most common malignancy in the endocrine system (1). Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) can be further classified into conventional variant (CPTC), follicular variant (FVPTC) and other rare variants (2). Despite PTC is usually a well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma with a favorable prognosis, its incidence has been sharply rising in many countries over the last decades (3) (the average incidence in the USA was 2.4% from 1980 to 1997 and 6.6% from 1997 to 2009 (2)). In addition, recurrence and metastases are common for a small proportion of PTCs who reach advanced disease stages (4). In recent years, molecular markers have received extensive attention to improving risk stratification of PTC (5). BRAF is the main subtype of RAF kinase and plays a key role in tumorigenesis. The mutation of BRAF V600E could trigger tumorigenesis through constitutively activating MAPK pathway (6). As the most common mutation observed in PTC, BRAF V600E has received special attention in various ethnic populations since this protein kinase may contribute to cell proliferation, growth and division. However, due to the limited large cohort evidence, the function of BRAF V600E as a biomarker in driving aggressiveness in PTC continues debatable (7, 8). The majority of researches claimed that BRAF V600E mutation was associated with poor clinicopathologic outcomes in patients with PTC, such as large tumor size, lymph node metastases, advanced clinical stages and recurrence (9, 10). By contrast, several studies suggested that BRAF V600E mutation had no significant association with clinical stage, multicentricity or recurrence (11, 12). These equivocal findings have hindered the fact that whether the mutation had an impact on aggressive behavior of PTC. Furthermore, most researches have focused on the relationship between mutation and clinicopathological characteristics, but the epidemiologic factors related to BRAF V600E mutations were rarely studied in previous researches. Here, we investigated epidemiological characteristics that may be associated with the mutation of BRAF V600E and then studied the role of BRAF V600E mutation in the clinicopathological features of PTC.

Patients and methods

Patient identification and clinicopathologic data collection

This study included 2048 patients (1556 women and 492 men) age 43.14 ± 11.01 years (mean ± s.d.) who were diagnosed with PTC and underwent surgery between January 2015 and July 2018 at the Department of the thyroid, breast and vascular surgery in Xijing Hospital. These patients were clinically observed with mean follow-up time of 23.4 months (range 5–47 months) after the initial treatments. All these patients were regularly followed with physical examinations, thyroid function tests and neck ultrasonography every 6–12 months after the initial surgery. If suspicious or indeterminate thyroid nodules or lymph nodes were found, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) was used for evaluation. Between January 2015 and July 2018, 2850 patients were diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Among these, 2805 patients (98.42%) were diagnosed with PTC, and 45 patients (1.58%) were diagnosed with other types of thyroid carcinoma. PTC patients without BRAF V600E status or lost to follow-up were excluded. The flow diagram of patient included was shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of patient included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Flow diagram of patient included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After institutional review board approval and informed patient consenting, we retrospectively collected detailed BRAF V600E and clinicopathologic data from institutional patient records. The epidemiological data and clinicopathological features were summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Patients with alcohol history was defined as patients who drinking more than twice a month and lasting more than 1 year. Patients with smoking history was defined as patients who had a current or past smoking history of ≥6 months. Tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages were defined based on the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Persistent or recurrent disease was defined as the presence of a structural abnormality confirmed by cytological or surgical pathology after the initial surgery. The BRAF V600E mutation results had no influence on the treatment decision making.
Table 1

Association of BRAF V600E with epidemiologic features of all PTC.

BRAF V600E mutation (−)BRAF V600E mutation (+)χ2P value
No. (%)No. (%)
Total No. of cases333 (16.3)1715 (83.7)
Age at diagnosis
 ≤45224 (20.3)881 (79.7)28.366<0.001
 >45109 (11.6)834 (88.4)
Sex
 Male74 (15.0)418 (85.0)0.7070.400
 Female259 (16.6)1297 (83.4)
Family history of cancer
 Had any family member(s) with history of cancer27 (11.4)209 (88.6)4.5500.033
 None306 (22.5)1506 (77.5)
Presence of history of cancer
 Had any other cancer5 (12.5)35 (87.5)0.4240.515
 None328 (16.3)1680 (83.7)
Presence of smoking history
 Ever28 (18.1)127 (81.9)0.4010.527
 Never305 (16.1)1588 (83.9)
Presence of alcohol history
 Ever7 (15.2)39 (84.8)0.0380.846
 Never326 (16.3)1676 (83.7)
Concomitant diabetes
 Yes8 (8.6)85 (91.4)4.1960.041
 No325 (16.6)1630 (83.4)
Concomitant hypertension
 Yes18 (7.0)238 (93.0)18.300<0.001
 No315 (17.6)1477 (82.4)
Concomitant benign thyroid diseases
 Hyperthyroid
  Yes7 (24.1)22 (75.9)/0.305
  No326 (16.1)1693 (83.9)
 Nodular goiter
  Yes19 (20.4)74 (79.6)1.2440.265
  No314 (16.1)1641 (83.9)
 HT
  Yes96 (28.9)236 (71.1)46.611<0.001
  No237 (13.8)1479 (86.2)

The chi-square test (χ2 test) or, for small cell sizes, Fisher’s exact test was employed to examine the significance of association between BRAF V600E and epidemiologic features. P value <0.05 was treated as statistically significant. Bold indicates statistical significance.

‘/’ means no χ2 value because cell sizes were small and Fisher’s exact test was employed. ‘%’ is the proportion of patients with or without BRAF V600E mutations in the subgroup of patients.

HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis.

Table 2

Relationship of BRAF V600E with clinicopathological features of All PTC.

BRAF V600E mutation (−)BRAF V600E mutation (+)χ2P value
No. (%)No. (%)
Total no. of cases333 (16.3)1715 (83.7)
Surgery
 Lobectomy53 (14.8)306 (85.2)0.7160.397
 Total thyroidectomy280 (16.6)1409 (83.4)
Histological type
 CPTC321 (15.9)1701 (84.1)/<0.001
 FVPTC12 (46.2)14 (53.8)
Tumor size
 ≤2 cm290 (15.6)1564 (84.4)5.4880.019
 >2 cm43 (22.2)151 (77.8)
 Median (quartile), cm1.0 (0.7–1.5)0.9 (0.7–1.4)
Lesions
 Unilateral 260 (18.0)1184 (82.0)10.9590.001
 Bilateral 73 (12.1)531 (87.9)
Extrathyroidal invasion
 Yes45 (15.6)244 (84.4)0.1170.732
 No288 (16.4)1471 (83.6)
Vascular invasion
 Yes43 (15.4)237 (84.6)0.1940.660
 No290 (16.4)1478 (83.6)
Status of lymph node metastasesa
 Yes190 (18.2)855 (81.8)3.7040.054
 No127 (14.9)727 (85.1)
Site of lymph node metastases
 Only central92 (14.0)564 (86.0)20.648<0.001
 Only lateral13 (23.2)43 (76.8)
 Central and lateral85 (25.5)248 (74.5)
Disease stage (7th edition)b
 I + II282 (17.8)1301 (82.2)6.7180.010
 III + IV48 (12.3)341 (87.7)
Distant metastatic
 Yes1 (20.0)4 (80.0)/1.000
 No332 (16.3)1711 (83.7)
Persistent or recurrent disease
 Yes19 (22.1)67 (77.9)2.2430.134
 No314 (16.0)1648 (84.0)

The chi-square test (χ2 test) or, for small cell sizes, Fisher’s exact test was employed to examine the significance of association between BRAF V600E and clinicopathological features. P value <0.05 was treated as statistically significant. Bold indicates statistical significance. Tumor size was summarized with medians (quartile).

‘/’means no χ2 value because cell sizes were small and Fisher’s exact test was employed. ‘%’ is the proportion of patients with or without BRAF V600E mutations in the subgroup of patients. ‘a’ means there are missing cases in ‘Status of lymph node metastases’. In patients without BRAF V600E mutations, 16 patients had undetermined lymph node metastasis status. In patients with BRAF V600E mutations, 133 patients had undetermined lymph node metastasis status. ‘b’ means there are missing cases in ‘Disease stage’. In patients without BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of three patients cannot be determined. In patients with BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of 73 patients cannot be determined.

CPTC, conventional papillary thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC, follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Association of BRAF V600E with epidemiologic features of all PTC. The chi-square test (χ2 test) or, for small cell sizes, Fisher’s exact test was employed to examine the significance of association between BRAF V600E and epidemiologic features. P value <0.05 was treated as statistically significant. Bold indicates statistical significance. ‘/’ means no χ2 value because cell sizes were small and Fisher’s exact test was employed. ‘%’ is the proportion of patients with or without BRAF V600E mutations in the subgroup of patients. HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis. Relationship of BRAF V600E with clinicopathological features of All PTC. The chi-square test (χ2 test) or, for small cell sizes, Fisher’s exact test was employed to examine the significance of association between BRAF V600E and clinicopathological features. P value <0.05 was treated as statistically significant. Bold indicates statistical significance. Tumor size was summarized with medians (quartile). ‘/’means no χ2 value because cell sizes were small and Fisher’s exact test was employed. ‘%’ is the proportion of patients with or without BRAF V600E mutations in the subgroup of patients. ‘a’ means there are missing cases in ‘Status of lymph node metastases’. In patients without BRAF V600E mutations, 16 patients had undetermined lymph node metastasis status. In patients with BRAF V600E mutations, 133 patients had undetermined lymph node metastasis status. ‘b’ means there are missing cases in ‘Disease stage’. In patients without BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of three patients cannot be determined. In patients with BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of 73 patients cannot be determined. CPTC, conventional papillary thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC, follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Mutational analyses

BRAF V600E mutational analyses were performed by pathologists after surgical treatments of patients. DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks by SDS-proteinase K method and subjected to Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)- real-time PCR for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations. DNA was extracted from each sample via a commercial kit (FFPE DNA reagent, Cat No. ADx-FF01) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Typically, 5 μm sections (2–4 pieces) were carefully micro-dissected from FFPE tissue blocks. The sections were initially treated with 1.5 mL xylene/ethanol three times, then digested during an overnight incubation with 20 μL proteinase K solution and 180 μL buffer DTL in a 56°C rotating incubator, and DNA purification was performed through QIAgen columns, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the most common T1799A transversion (BRAF V600E) mutation was studied. The PCR was used to amplify exon 15 of the BRAF gene, which was detected by BRAF V600 Mutations Detection Kit (Applied by ADx-BR01, AmoyDx Company, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR primer sequences were as follows: forward primer, TCTGTAGCAGCCCTCAGTAGCGAAGCAGTGATTTTGGTCTAGCTACAGA; reverse primer, AGCCCTCAGTAGCGAAGCAACTCAGCAGCATCTCAGG. BRAF gene reactions were performed in a final volume of 40 μL using as template 10–15 ng of genomic DNA, with 1× buffer including 14 pmol forward primer, 20 pmol reverse primer, 12.5 pmol dNTPs, 350 pmol MgCl2, mutant probe 20 pmol and 1 unit of Taq polymerase. Each reaction included a positive and a negative control sample, and in negative sample, DNA template was substituted by water. PCR recycling started with initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 25 s), annealing (64°C, 20 s) and extension (72°C, 20 s) and a last step of 10 min extension at 72°C. PCR efficiency was determined by measuring the Ct value of FAM signal.

Statistical analyses

Data related to histologic characteristics, patient epidemiological data and clinical outcomes were collected. Categorical data were summarized with frequencies and percentages. Continuous data were summarized with means ± standard deviations (if it is a normal distribution) or medians and quartile (if it is not a normal distribution). The chi-square test (χ2 test) or, for small cell sizes, Fisher’s exact test was employed to examine categorical variables. All P values were two-sided, and a P value <0.05 was treated as statistically significant. Pooled ORs with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the relationship between BRAF V600E mutation and clinicopathological features. All statistical analyses were conducted by the software of SPSS with version 23.0.

Results

BRAF V600E mutation in PTC

There were 2048 patients included in the study with an average age of 43.14 ± 11.01 (range 5–80), and 76.0% of the patients were female (1556 women and 492 men). BRAF V600E mutation was found in 1701 of 2022 (84.1%) CPTCs, and 14 of 26 (53.8%) FVPTCs, with an overall prevalence of 83.7% (1715 of 2048). No significant difference of BRAF V600E mutation was observed in female and male patients (P = 0.400). With regard to ages, significant difference of BRAF V600E incidence was found between patients aged ≤45 and >45 years (79.7 vs 88.4%, P < 0.001). To further investigate the influence of age on mutational incidence, we divided all patients into children/adolescent group (≤25 years) and adults groups of various age ranges (25–35, 35–45, 45–55, >55 years old). As shown in Fig. 2, patients were more prone to be BRAF V600E positive with the growth of age.
Figure 2

The correlation between the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation and the age of patients at the time of diagnosis.

The correlation between the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation and the age of patients at the time of diagnosis.

Association of BRAF V600E and epidemiological features in PTCs

To identify epidemiological factors associated with BRAF V600E mutation, the relationship between epidemiological features and the mutation was investigated. In the univariate analysis of 2048 PTCs (Table 1), the presence of BRAF V600E mutation was found to be significantly associated with several epidemiological features, including age at diagnosis, family history of cancer, concomitant diabetes, hypertension and Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT). The incidence of BRAF V600E mutations in patients with family cancer history was higher than that in patients without family history of cancer (88.6 vs 77.5%, P = 0.033). Interestingly, patients with diabetes or hypertension presented higher mutation rates than those who did not have diabetes or hypertension (91.4 vs 83.4%, P = 0.041; 93.0 vs 82.4%, P < 0.001). Conversely, the patients concomitant of HT displayed less BRAF V600E mutations than patients without HT (71.1 vs 86.2%, P < 0.001). Similarly, patients with hyperthyroid or nodular goiter showed lower mutation frequency than those who did not have hyperthyroid or nodular goiter, but the association was insignificant. Except the factors mentioned above, no significant association was found between the presence of BRAF V600E mutation and other features including gender, presence of history of cancer, presence of smoking and alcohol history.

Relationship of BRAF V600E and clinicopathological features in PTCs

In the univariate analysis of all PTCs (Table 2), the presence of BRAF V600E was found to be significantly associated with small tumor size (P = 0.019), bilateral multifocality (P = 0.001), less central and lateral lymph node metastases simultaneously (P < 0.001) and advanced disease stage (III and IV) (P = 0.010). Although there was no significant association, less BRAF V600E mutation was found in patients with lymph node metastases than patients without lymph node metastases (81.8 vs 85.1%, P = 0.054). Furthermore, it was worth noticing that less BRAF V600E presented in patients with aggressive lymph node metastases (central and lateral metastases at the same time) than patients with only central or only lateral lymph node metastases (74.5 vs 86.0% or 76.8%, P < 0.001). No significant association was found between BRAF V600E mutation and another high-risk clinicopathologic characteristics, such as extrathyroidal invasion (P = 0.732), vascular invasion (P = 0.660), distant metastatic (P = 1.000) and PTC persistence or recurrence (P = 0.134).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in PTCs

To further confirm the relationship between BRAF V600E and epidemiological or clinicopathological features, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed (Table 3). The results showed that age (P = 0.002, OR = 1.024, 95% CI = 1.009–1.041), concomitant hypertension (P = 0.032, OR = 1.812, 95% CI = 1.052–3.120) and lesions (P = 0.006, OR = 1.233, 95% CI = 1.063–1.431) were positive independent factors for BRAF V600E mutation. In contrast, concomitant HT (P < 0.001, OR = 0.402, 95% CI = 0.300–0.538) and lateral lymph node metastases (P < 0.001, OR = 0.496, 95% CI = 0.357–0.689) were negative independent factors for BRAF V600E mutation. After adjustment for patients’ age and sex, the association between BRAF V600E mutation and disease stage was not statistically significant (P = 0.771, OR = 1.028, 95% CI = 0.856–1.234).
Table 3

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of BRAF V600E mutation of all PTC.

BRAF V600E mutation (n, %)P ValueOR95% CI
+
Age at diagnosis39.29 ± 11.4443.88 ± 10.770.0021.0241.009–1.041
Sex0.7501.0510.773–1.431
 Male74 (15.0%)418 (85.0%)
 Female259 (16.6%)1297 (83.4%)
Family history of cancer0.1951.3520.857–2.131
 Had any family member(s) with history of cancer27 (11.4%)209 (88.6%)
 None306 (22.5%)1506 (77.5%)
Concomitant diabetes 0.4281.3890.616–3.129
 Yes8 (8.6%)85 (91.4%)
 No325 (16.6%)1630 (83.4%)
Concomitant hypertension0.0321.8121.052–3.120
 Yes18 (7.0%)238 (93.0%)
 No315 (17.6%)1477 (82.4%)
Concomitant HT<0.0010.4020.300–0.538
 Yes96 (28.9%)236 (71.1%)
 No237 (13.8%)1479 (86.2%)
Tumor size1.0 (0.7–1.5)0.9 (0.7–1.4)0.5710.9500.795–1.135
Lesions0.0061.2331.063–1.431
 Unilateral260 (18.0%)1184 (82.0%)
 Bilateral73 (12.1%)531 (87.9%)
Site of lymph node metastasis
 Central177 (17.9%)811 (82.1%)0.3461.1570.854–1.568
 Lateral98 (25.2%)290 (74.8%)<0.0010.4960.357–0.689
Disease stage (7th edition)a0.7711.0280.856–1.234
 I + II282 (17.8%)1301 (82.2%)
 III + IV48 (12.3%)341 (87.7%)

Age at diagnosis was summarized with means ± standard deviations. Tumor size was summarized with medians (quartile). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for BRAF V600E mutations. P value <0.05 was treated as statistically significant. Bold indicates statistical significance.

‘%’ is the proportion of patients with or without BRAF V600E mutations in the subgroup of patients. ‘a’ means there are missing cases in ‘Disease stage’. In patients without BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of three patients cannot be determined. In patients with BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of 73 patients cannot be determined.

HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of BRAF V600E mutation of all PTC. Age at diagnosis was summarized with means ± standard deviations. Tumor size was summarized with medians (quartile). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for BRAF V600E mutations. P value <0.05 was treated as statistically significant. Bold indicates statistical significance. ‘%’ is the proportion of patients with or without BRAF V600E mutations in the subgroup of patients. ‘a’ means there are missing cases in ‘Disease stage’. In patients without BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of three patients cannot be determined. In patients with BRAF V600E mutations, the disease stage of 73 patients cannot be determined. HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

This study sought to find the epidemiological factors associated with BRAF V600E mutation and clarify the relationship between BRAF V600E mutation and clinical outcomes in PTC. Previously, the BRAF V600E mutation has been reported as an aggressive prognosis in PTC, although a large cohort study was inadequate and there have been noteworthy inconsistencies in some studies (13, 14). In our analysis, we found a lack of correlation between BRAF V600E mutation and either aggressive clinicopathological features or persistent or recurrent disease. The incidence of BRAF V600E mutation increased in recent years, it seems that BRAF V600E mutation gradually become the accompanying phenomenon for PTC patients. Mingzhao Xing et al. reported BRAF V600E rate of 38.3% in patients between 1990 and 2012 (15). In 2007, Electron et al. reported the prevalence of BRAF V600E was 46.4% (16). In 2012, Kurtulmus et al. showed BRAF V600E mutation rate of 39.45% in PTCs (17). The meta-analysis showed BRAF V600E mutations occurred in 60.6% of PTCs (update to August, 2015) (6). In 2016, Kim et al. reported BRAF V600E mutations were presented in 83.7% PTC patients (2789 of 3332) (18), and we found the similar mutation rate in our sample. Compared to previous researches, we update BRAF V600E mutation data from 2015 to 2018. The reason why mutation prevalence in our study is higher than the average may ascribe to population aging in recent years and different research methodology. In this study, the BRAF V600E mutations were tested from the postoperative tissue samples using the ARMS- real-time PCR method, which was more sensitive and robust at detecting BRAF V600E somatic mutations than DNA sequencing on clinical samples (19). Our study indicated that older age and concomitant hypertension were independent risk factors of BRAF V600E mutation. On the contrary, concomitant HT was an independent protective factor of the mutation. Despite being insignificant after multivariate adjustment, the presence of family history of cancer was associated with higher BRAF V600E mutation incidence in the univariate analysis, which were in agreement with the data reported in previous study (20). In addition, with the large size of this study, negative correlation between HT and BRAF V600E mutation was demonstrated, which was confirmed in a recent smaller study (21). Potential mechanisms and immunological link that might lead to the synchronous appearance of HT and PTC had been investigated (22, 23). If there is more clinical evidence, the correlation between BRAF V600E and family history of cancer, hypertension and HT may help to promote the investigation of BRAF V600E mutation mechanism. As for the factor of age, plenty of researches had found that incidence of BRAF V600E was higher in patients >45 years old (10, 16), but few studies found the positive correlation between BRAF V600E and age (Fig. 2). Compared to adults, PTC in pediatric and adolescents presents more lymph node metastases, distant metastases and recurrence (24, 25). Combining the study mentioned above, the phenomenon that less number of BRAF V600E mutations appears in patients aged under 25 years suggested that aggressive features displayed in these patients may not be caused by BRAF V600E mutation. The aggressive role of BRAF V600E mutations has been widely investigated in previous studies (6, 8, 10). However, our results did not show that BRAF V600E mutation is a biomarker in driving aggressiveness. Given the high and increased prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in recent years (60.6%, on average, in the meta-analysis mentioned above (6), and 83.7% in our study), and the oppositely indolent behavior, the rarity recurrence and mortality of PTC (16 and 3%, respectively) (26, 27), an absence of association between BRAF V600E mutation, and these negative events seem logical. In univariate analyses, BRAF V600E mutations were significantly associated with smaller tumor, bilateral multifocality, advanced disease stage and less aggressive lymph node metastases in PTCs. Advanced TNM stage showed insignificant after multivariate adjustment. Therefore, bilateral multifocality seems to be the only risk factor associated with BRAF V600E. Notably, a recent study showed tumor multifocality has no independent risk prognostic value in outcomes of PTC (28). Other classic risk factors (29), such as extrathyroidal extension, distant metastases and disease recurrence, were insignificantly associated with BRAF V600E mutation. Therefore, presence of BRAF V600E is not an aggressive role associated with poor clinicopathologic outcomes in PTC. A recent publication has called into question the relationship of BRAF V600E mutation and prognosis in PTC. In the analysis of 508 patients with BRAF V600E mutation, Henke et al. found the mutation is not predictive of long-term outcome in PTC (7). Although the presence of BRAF V600E mutation is not an aggressive prognosis on poor clinical outcomes, surgery strategy and treatment guided by the presence of the mutation may be available. Such therapies might include determining surgery extent and the use of BRAF inhibitors. The association between BRAF V600E and bilateral lesions and less lateral lymph node metastases was found in our study. If there is more clinical evidence in the future, the status of BRAF V600E mutation may be considered as one of the factors for determining the surgery extent besides tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, vascular invasion, lymph node size and willingness of patients (30). Furthermore, considerable patients with BRAF V600E mutation will have recurrence since a majority of PTC patients in our cohort (83.7%) had the mutation. We propose that high-risk patients with BRAF V600E mutation use BRAF inhibitors, such as sorafenib, lenvatinib and vemurafenib. Those patients might benefit from the targeted therapy, which (sorafenib and lenvatinib) have been approved for metastatic PTC (31). The greatest strengths of this study are its consecutive large cohort (2048 PTC patients) and its latest research time (from 2015 to 2018). The limitations of this study were as follows. First, a selection bias could occur in this retrospective unicentral research. The large consecutive cohort of patients may help minimize the bias. Second, follow-up time was short in this study (mean 23.4 months, range, 5–47 months). And research on the mechanism of epidemiological features associated with BRAF V600E mutation in PTCs should be carried out in the future. In summary, this was a large consecutive retrospective study that investigated the relationship of BRAF V600E mutation with epidemiological and clinicopathological features. Older age and concomitant hypertension were independent risk factors of BRAF V600E mutation. Concomitant HT was an independent protective factor for the BRAF V600E expression. Bilateral multifocality was the only risk factor associated with BRAF V600E but a recent study showed it has no independent risk prognostic value in outcomes of PTC. Other poor clinicopathological features were insignificantly associated with the mutation. Although the presence of BRAF V600E mutation is not an aggressive prognosis on poor clinical outcomes, surgery and treatment guided by the presence of the mutation may be available.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81572917).

Ethical approval

Consent has been obtained from each patient after full explanation of the purpose and nature of all procedures used. The study was approved by an independent ethics committee of Xijing Hospital (first affiliated hospital of Fourth Military Medical University).
  31 in total

1.  The association of the BRAF(V600E) mutation with prognostic factors and poor clinical outcome in papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae Hyuk Kim; Young Joo Park; Jung Ah Lim; Hwa Young Ahn; Eun Kyung Lee; You Jin Lee; Kyung Won Kim; Seo Kyung Hahn; Yeo Kyu Youn; Kwang Hyun Kim; Bo Youn Cho; Do Joon Park
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Sorafenib in radioactive iodine-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Marcia S Brose; Christopher M Nutting; Barbara Jarzab; Rossella Elisei; Salvatore Siena; Lars Bastholt; Christelle de la Fouchardiere; Furio Pacini; Ralf Paschke; Young Kee Shong; Steven I Sherman; Johannes W A Smit; John Chung; Christian Kappeler; Carol Peña; István Molnár; Martin J Schlumberger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Thyroid surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer - recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Tracy S Wang; Julie Ann Sosa
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  The BRAF(V600E) mutation in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: does the mutation have an impact on clinical outcome?

Authors:  Agnieszka Walczyk; Aldona Kowalska; Artur Kowalik; Jacek Sygut; Elżbieta Wypiórkiewicz; Renata Chodurska; Liliana Pięciak; Stanisław Góźdź
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  Meta-Analyses of Association Between BRAF(V600E) Mutation and Clinicopathological Features of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Shao-zheng Liu; Qing Zhang; Yan-xing Guan; Qing-jie Chen; Qin-yao Zhu
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 6.  Thyroid Autoimmunity and Thyroid Cancer: Review Focused on Cytological Studies.

Authors:  Francesco Boi; Fabiana Pani; Stefano Mariotti
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2017-04-24

7.  The prevalence and prognostic value of BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Electron Kebebew; Julie Weng; Juergen Bauer; Gustavo Ranvier; Orlo H Clark; Quan-Yang Duh; Daniel Shibru; Boris Bastian; Ann Griffin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Hashimoto's thyroiditis and papillary thyroid cancer: are they immunologically linked?

Authors:  Margret Ehlers; Matthias Schott
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 12.015

9.  Association between BRAF V600E mutation and mortality in patients with papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Mingzhao Xing; Ali S Alzahrani; Kathryn A Carson; David Viola; Rossella Elisei; Bela Bendlova; Linwah Yip; Caterina Mian; Federica Vianello; R Michael Tuttle; Eyal Robenshtok; James A Fagin; Efisio Puxeddu; Laura Fugazzola; Agnieszka Czarniecka; Barbara Jarzab; Christine J O'Neill; Mark S Sywak; Alfred K Lam; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre; Pilar Santisteban; Hirotaka Nakayama; Ralph P Tufano; Sara I Pai; Martha A Zeiger; William H Westra; Douglas P Clark; Roderick Clifton-Bligh; David Sidransky; Paul W Ladenson; Vlasta Sykorova
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  BRAF mutation is not predictive of long-term outcome in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Lauren E Henke; John D Pfeifer; Changquing Ma; Stephanie M Perkins; Todd DeWees; Samir El-Mofty; Jeffrey F Moley; Brian Nussenbaum; Bruce H Haughey; Thomas J Baranski; Julie K Schwarz; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  28 in total

1.  Comparison of the clinicopathological features and oncologic outcomes of the classic papillary thyroid carcinoma with tall cell features and tall cell variant.

Authors:  Kwangsoon Kim; Chan Kwon Jung; Dong-Jun Lim; Ja Seong Bae; Jeong Soo Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

2.  Risk Factors for Contralateral Occult Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Patients with Clinical Unilateral Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Liu Yihao; Li Shuo; Xi Pu; Wang Zipeng; Sun Hanlin; Chang Qungang; Wang Yongfei; Yin Detao
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Predictive Value of Clinical and Pathological Characteristics for Metastatic Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A 16-year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jinyan Chai; Ruiguo Zhang; Wei Zheng; Guizhi Zhang; Qiang Jia; Jian Tan; Zhaowei Meng; Renfei Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Diagnostic value of puncture feeling combined with BRAF V600E mutation in repeat US-FNA biopsy of Bethesda III thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Li Li; Peipei Li; Xiao Chen; Lin Kang; Yuquan Ye
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-06

5.  Genetic Determinants for Prediction of Outcome of Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Antónia Afonso Póvoa; Elisabete Teixeira; Maria Rosa Bella-Cueto; Rui Batista; Ana Pestana; Miguel Melo; Thalita Alves; Mafalda Pinto; Manuel Sobrinho-Simões; Jorge Maciel; Paula Soares
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Incidence of BRAF V600E mutation in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Shoko Kure; Kousuke Ishino; Mitsuhiro Kudo; Ryuichi Wada; Marie Saito; Ryuta Nagaoka; Iwao Sugitani; Zenya Naito
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 7.  The multifaceted anti-cancer effects of BRAF-inhibitors.

Authors:  Laura Croce; Francesca Coperchini; Flavia Magri; Luca Chiovato; Mario Rotondi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 8.  The Role of Snail-1 in Thyroid Cancer-What We Know So Far.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wieczorek-Szukala; Andrzej Lewinski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Somatic Mutation Profiling of Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas by Whole-exome Sequencing and Its Relationship with Clinical Characteristics.

Authors:  Tingyue Qi; Xin Rong; Qingling Feng; Hongguang Sun; Haiyan Cao; Yan Yang; Hao Feng; Linhai Zhu; Lei Wang; Qiu Du
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Risk Factors for Contralateral Occult Carcinoma in Patients With Unilateral Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Boyuan Zheng; Xiaohui Yu; Xichang Wang; Shiwei Wang; Weiping Teng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.