| Literature DB >> 31252402 |
Amarjit Saini1,2, Linda Björkhem-Bergman3, Johan Boström1,2, Mats Lilja1,2, Michael Melin1,2,4, Karl Olsson1,2, Lena Ekström5, Peter Bergman6, Mikael Altun1,2, Eric Rullman1,2,4, Thomas Gustafsson1,2.
Abstract
The CC-genotype of the VDR polymorphism TaqI rs731236 has previously been associated with a higher risk of developing myopathy compared to TT-carriers. However, the mechanistic role of this polymorphism in skeletal muscle is not well defined. The effects of vitamin D on patients genotyped for the VDR polymorphism TaqI rs731236, comparing CC and TT-carriers were evaluated. Primary human myoblasts isolated from 4 CC-carriers were compared with myoblasts isolated from 4 TT-carriers and treated with vitamin D in vitro. A dose-dependent inhibitory effect on myoblast proliferation and differentiation was observed concurrent with modifications of key myogenic regulatory factors. RNA-sequencing revealed a Vitamin D dose-response gene signature enriched with a higher number of VDR-responsive elements (VDREs) per gene. Interestingly, the greater the expression of muscle differentiation markers in myoblasts the more pronounced was the Vitamin D-mediated response to suppress genes associated with myogenic fusion and myotube formation. This novel finding provides a mechanistic explanation to the inconsistency regarding previous reports of the role of vitamin D in myoblast differentiation. No effects in myoblast proliferation, differentiation or gene expression were related to CC vs. TT carriers. Our findings suggest that the VDR polymorphism TaqI rs731236 comparing CC vs. TT carriers did not influence the effects of vitamin D on primary human myoblasts and that vitamin D inhibits myoblast proliferation and differentiation through key regulators of cell cycle progression. Future studies need to employ strategies to identify the primary responses of vitamin D that drive the cellular response towards quiescence.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31252402 PMCID: PMC6652245 DOI: 10.1530/EC-19-0194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocr Connect ISSN: 2049-3614 Impact factor: 3.335
Figure 1Using high-throughput imaging analysis, primary human muscle cells with the Taq1 polymorphism were stained and imaged for DAPI and EdU incorporation after 48-h exposure to DMSO alone or 0.01 nM, 1 nM and 100 nM 1,25(OH)2D3. Data are presented for change in total cell count (A), change in the percentage incorporation of EdU-positive cells (B) and change in the percentage of cells that are G2 positive (C), as the mean ± s.e.m. TT versus CC. (D) Unsupervised clustering using tSNE of gene expression of all cells and all used dosages of vitamin. (E and F) VDR and CYP24A1 expression following various dosages of vitamin D.
Figure 2(A) Volcano plot illustrating genes differentially expressed in a dose-dependent manner upon stimulation with vitamin D. (B) Volcano plot highlighting transcription factors differentially expressed upon vitamin D stimulation. (C) Illustration of dose-dependent changes in gene expression of the top-most significant biological functions identified using gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA). (D) Distribution of the number of VDR-responsive elements ≤10 kbp upstream of vitamin D dose-responsive genes (green), versus non-differentially expressed genes (red). (E) Boxplots of selected differentially expressed transcription factors illustrating vitamin D dose–response for three selected genes: FOXO3, NFAT2 and MEF2.
Figure 3(A) Unsupervised cluster analysis of the transcriptome using tSNE revealed two distinct groups of cells. (B) Empirical cumulative distribution (ECDF) graph of genes involved in ‘muscle differentiation’ in the two groups. (C) Differences in gene expression between the two groups illustrated by ridgeplot of using gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA).
Figure 4(A) Scatterplot illustrating the relationship between the vitamin D dose–response in the differentiated versus less differentiated cluster of cells. Red denotes genes up or downregulated in a similar fashion in both groups. Encircled blue are a subset of genes, all of which were significantly downregulated upon vitamin D stimulation in more differentiated cells, but were instead upregulated in cells from the less differentiated cluster (FDR for interaction <0.05). (B) A ridgeplot illustrating gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of the genes with opposite/contrasting differential expression pattern in more versus less differentiated cells. Boxplots of genes with a reversed expression pattern in more versus less differentiated cells illustrating a clear anti-differentiation effect of vitamin D where cells with high expression of genes involved in muscle differentiation respond with a robust downregulation of these genes, (C) miR-133, (D) MSTN (Myostatin) and (E) RYR1.