Literature DB >> 31252090

Moderators of Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Test of the Limit, Activate, and Enhance Model.

Melissa A Day1, Beverly E Thorn2, Dawn M Ehde3, John W Burns4, Amanda Barnier5, Jason B Mattingley6, Natasha Matthews7, Mark P Jensen3.   

Abstract

This study examined psychosocial pain treatment moderation in a secondary analysis of a trial that compared cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness-meditation (MM), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The Limit, Activate, and Enhance (LA&E) model of moderation provided a framework for testing a priori hypotheses. Adult participants (N = 69) with CLBP completed a pretreatment assessment of hypothesized moderators: pain catastrophizing, brain state as assessed by electroencephalogram, mindful observing, and nonreactivity. Outcomes were pain interference, characteristic pain intensity, physical function, and depression, assessed at pre- and post-treatment. Moderation analyses found significant interaction effects, specifically: 1) higher and lower baseline pain catastrophizing was associated with greater improvement in pain intensity in MM and MBCT, respectively; 2) higher baseline theta power was associated with greater improvement in depression in MBCT and interfered with response to CT; 3) lower baseline nonreactivity was associated with greater improvement in physical function in MM while higher nonreactivity was associated with greater improvement in MBCT. The findings support the possibility that different patients are more or less likely to benefit from various treatments. Theory-driven moderation research has the capacity to inform the development of patient-treatment matching algorithms to optimize outcome. PERSPECTIVE: This study presents preliminary findings from theory-driven tests of the moderators of mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain. The results of such analyses may inform the understanding of for whom various evidence-based psychosocial pain treatments may engender the most meaningful benefits.
Copyright © 2019 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Moderation; chronic low back pain; patient-treatment matching; psychosocial treatment; theory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31252090     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  3 in total

1.  COPAHS Study: protocol of a randomised experimental study comparing the effects of hypnosis, mindfulness meditation, and spiritual practices on experimental pain in healthy adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Ferreira-Valente; Filipa Pimenta; Rui M Costa; Melissa A Day; José Pais-Ribeiro; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Study protocol and methods for Easing Pelvic Pain Interventions Clinical Research Program (EPPIC): a randomized clinical trial of brief, low-intensity, transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy vs education/support for urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS).

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lackner; James Jaccard; Brian M Quigley; Tova S Ablove; Teresa L Danforth; Rebecca S Firth; Gregory D Gudleski; Susan S Krasner; Christopher D Radziwon; Alison M Vargovich; J Quentin Clemens; Bruce D Naliboff
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach.

Authors:  Matthew C Mauck; Aileen F Aylward; Chloe E Barton; Brandon Birckhead; Timothy Carey; Diane M Dalton; Aaron J Fields; Julie Fritz; Afton L Hassett; Anna Hoffmeyer; Sara B Jones; Samuel A McLean; Wolf E Mehling; Conor W O'Neill; Michael J Schneider; David A Williams; Patricia Zheng; Ajay D Wasan
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2022-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.