Literature DB >> 31251989

Preanalytic Variables and Tissue Stewardship for Reliable Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Clinical Analysis.

Paolo A Ascierto1, Carlo Bifulco2, Giuseppe Palmieri3, Solange Peters4, Nikoletta Sidiropoulos5.   

Abstract

An enduring goal of personalized medicine in cancer is the ability to identify patients who are likely to respond to specific therapies. Our growing understanding of the biology and molecular signatures of individual tumor types has facilitated the identification of predictive biomarkers and has led to an increasing number of diagnostic tests to be performed, often as serial and distinct assays on limited tumor specimens. The biomarker diagnostics field has been revolutionized by next-generation sequencing (NGS), which provides a comprehensive overview of the genomic profile of a tumor. Many preanalytic variables can influence the accuracy and reliability of NGS results. Standardization of preanalytic variables is, however, complicated by the plethora of specimen acquisition and processing methods. Variables across the tissue journey, including specimen acquisition, specimen fixation, and sectioning, as well as postfixation processing, such as nucleic acid extraction, library preparation, and choice of sequencing methods, are critical for the reliability of NGS analysis; thus, standardization would be beneficial. In this article, each step in the tissue journey is outlined, with specific focus on preanalytic variables that can influence NGS results. Practical considerations for standardization of these variables are provided to facilitate accurate, reliable, and reproducible NGS-based molecular characterization of tumors, ultimately informing diagnosis and guiding treatment.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31251989     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  8 in total

1.  Pathologists at the Leading Edge of Optimizing the Tumor Tissue Journey for Diagnostic Accuracy and Molecular Testing.

Authors:  Luis E De Las Casas; David G Hicks
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Comprehensive tumor molecular profile analysis in clinical practice.

Authors:  Mustafa Özdoğan; Eirini Papadopoulou; Nikolaos Tsoulos; Aikaterini Tsantikidi; Vasiliki-Metaxa Mariatou; Georgios Tsaousis; Evgenia Kapeni; Evgenia Bourkoula; Dimitrios Fotiou; Georgios Kapetsis; Ioannis Boukovinas; Nikolaos Touroutoglou; Athanasios Fassas; Achilleas Adamidis; Paraskevas Kosmidis; Dimitrios Trafalis; Eleni Galani; George Lypas; Bülent Orhan; Sualp Tansan; Tahsin Özatlı; Onder Kırca; Okan Çakır; George Nasioulas
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 3.  Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in translational medicine and clinical practice.

Authors:  Vipul Baxi; Robin Edwards; Michael Montalto; Saurabh Saha
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Update on Molecular Diagnosis in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma and Its Role in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ka-Hei Murphy Sun; Yin-Ting Heylie Wong; Ka-Man Carmen Cheung; Carmen Michelle Yuen; Yun-Tat Ted Chan; Wing-Yan Jennifer Lai; Chun David Chao; Wing-Sum Katie Fan; Yuen-Kiu Karen Chow; Man-Fai Law; Ho-Chi Tommy Tam
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-05

5.  Artificial intelligence-augmented histopathologic review using image analysis to optimize DNA yield from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides.

Authors:  Bolesław L Osinski; Aïcha BenTaieb; Irvin Ho; Ryan D Jones; Rohan P Joshi; Andrew Westley; Michael Carlson; Caleb Willis; Luke Schleicher; Brett M Mahon; Martin C Stumpe
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 8.209

6.  An Expert, Multidisciplinary Perspective on Best Practices in Biomarker Testing in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  David C Madoff; Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; David Braxton; Lipika Goyal; Dhanpat Jain; Bruno C Odisio; Riad Salem; Mark Schattner; Rahul Sheth; Daneng Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 7.  Impact of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on Decision-Making in Precision Medicine for Pancreatic Cancer: Beyond Diagnosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imaoka; Mitsuhito Sasaki; Yusuke Hashimoto; Kazuo Watanabe; Shoichi Miyazawa; Taro Shibuki; Shuichi Mitsunaga; Masafumi Ikeda
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 8.  Optimizing the Diagnosis and Biomarker Testing for Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  May T Cho; Sepideh Gholami; Dorina Gui; Sooraj L Tejaswi; Ghaneh Fananapazir; Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; Zeljka Jutric; Jason B Samarasena; Xiaodong Li; Jennifer B Valerin; Jacob Mercer; Farshid Dayyani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.