| Literature DB >> 31251942 |
Céline Brochot1, Maribel Casas2, Cyntia Manzano-Salgado2, Florence A Zeman3, Thomas Schettgen4, Martine Vrijheid2, Frédéric Y Bois3.
Abstract
Prenatal exposures to perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) have been associated with child health outcomes, but many of these associations remain poorly characterized. The aim of this work was to provide new indicators of foetal exposure for the Spanish INMA birth cohort. First, a pregnancy and lactation physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was calibrated in a population framework to provide quantitative estimates for the PFOA and PFOS placental transfers in humans. The estimated distributions indicated that PFOA crosses the placental barrier at a rate three times higher than PFOS and shows a higher variability between mothers. The PBPK model was then used to back-calculate the time-varying daily intakes of the INMA mothers corrected for their individual history from a spot maternal concentration. We showed the importance of accounting for the mothers' history as different dietary intakes can result in similar measured concentrations at one time point. Finally, the foetal exposure was simulated in target organs over pregnancy using the PBPK model and the estimated maternal intakes. We showed that the pattern of PFOA and PFOS exposures varies greatly among the foetuses. About a third has levels of either one compound always higher than the levels of the other compound. The other two thirds showed different ranking of PFOA and PFOS in terms of concentrations in the target organs. Our simulated foetal exposures bring additional information to the measured maternal spot concentrations and can help to better characterize the prenatal exposure in target organs during windows of susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: Exposure assessment; In utero; PBPK model; PFAS; Pregnancy; Reverse dosimetry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31251942 DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ISSN: 0041-008X Impact factor: 4.219