Literature DB >> 31251885

Effects of Semantic Congruence on Sign Identification: An ERP Study.

Guoying Lu1, Guanhua Hou2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of semantic congruence and incongruence on sign identification by using event-related potentials (ERPs).
BACKGROUND: Sign systems have crucial roles in public spaces and traffic facilities. Poorly designed signs can easily confuse pedestrians and drivers and reduce the efficiency of public activities and urban administration.
METHOD: Thirty-one participants completed a sign identification experiment independently in a laboratory setting. Experimental materials were selected from GB/T 10001, a Chinese national recommendation standard that is officially named Public Information Graphical Symbols for Use on Signs. All ERP data were processed using MATLAB 13b, and behavioral data were analyzed using Stata 14.
RESULTS: N170, P200, N300, and N400 components were induced during semantic processing. Statistical analysis revealed that semantic congruence has a main effect on N300 in the frontal region and has a main effect on N400 at FZ in the frontal region, CPZ in the parietal-central region, and PZ in the parietal region. Amplitudes of N300 induced by picture-word matching were considerably different between the two experimental conditions at electrodes FZ and FCZ. Amplitudes of N400 were significantly larger in the incongruent condition than in the congruent condition.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that N300 and N400 are promising indicators for measuring semantic congruence in future sign design. APPLICATION: Our findings provide ERP indicators for measuring the semantic congruence of sign design, which can be easily applied to improve the efficiency of sign design and sign comprehension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; neurodesign; neuroergonomics; semantic cognition; sign identification

Year:  2019        PMID: 31251885     DOI: 10.1177/0018720819854880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  4 in total

1.  Are We Sensitive to Different Types of Safety Signs? Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Jun Bian; Huijian Fu; Jia Jin
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-06-02

2.  The Effect of Safety Signs on the Monitoring of Conflict and Erroneous Response.

Authors:  Linfeng Hu; Dingzhong Feng; Yelang Li; Jinwu Xu; Jiehui Zheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Neural Processing Differences of Facial Emotions Between Human and Vehicles: Evidence From an Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Zhuo Liu; Wenjun Du; Zhongrui Sun; Guanhua Hou; Zhuonan Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 4.  A Review of EEG and fMRI Measuring Aesthetic Processing in Visual User Experience Research.

Authors:  Zhepeng Rui; Zhenyu Gu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.