Literature DB >> 31251398

Conservative management of low-risk prostate cancer among young versus older men in the United States: Trends and outcomes from a novel national database.

Amandeep R Mahal1, Santino Butler2, Idalid Franco2, Vinayak Muralidhar2, Dalia Larios3, Luke R G Pike2, Shuang G Zhao4, Nina N Sanford5, Robert T Dess4, Felix Y Feng6, Anthony V D'Amico2, Daniel E Spratt4, James B Yu1, Paul L Nguyen2, Timothy R Rebbeck2,7, Brandon A Mahal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management for men aged ≤55 years with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) is debated given quality-of-life implications with definitive treatment versus the potential missed opportunity for cure with conservative management. The objective of this study was to define rates of conservative management for LRPC and associated short-term outcomes in young versus older men in the United States.
METHODS: The nonpublic Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Active Surveillance/Watchful Waiting (AS/WW) Database identified 50,302 men who were diagnosed with LRPC from 2010 through 2015. AS/WW rates in the United States were stratified by age (≤55 vs ≥56 years). Prostate cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality were defined by initial management type (AS/WW vs definitive treatment [referent]) and age.
RESULTS: AS/WW utilization increased from 8.61% (2010) to 34.56% (2015) among men aged ≤55 years (P for trend <0.001) and from 15.99% to 43.81% among men aged ≥56 years (P for trend <.001). Among patients who had ≤2 positive biopsy cores, AS/WW rates increased from 12.90% to 48.78% for men aged ≤55 years and from 21.85% to 58.01% for men aged ≥56 years. Among patients who had ≥3 positive biopsy cores, AS/WW rates increased from 3.89% to 22.45% for men aged ≤55 years and from 10.05% to 28.49% for men aged ≥56 years (all P for trend <.001). Five-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rates were <0.30% across age and initial management type subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: AS/WW rates quadrupled for patients aged ≤55 years from 2010 to 2015, with favorable short-term outcomes. These findings demonstrate the short-term safety and increasing acceptance of AS/WW for both younger and older patients. However, there are still higher absolute rates of AS/WW in older patients (P < .001), suggesting some national ambivalence toward AS/WW in younger patients.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active surveillance; conservative treatment; low-risk prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31251398     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  Trends in treatments for prostate cancer in the United States, 2010-2015.

Authors:  Jianwei Wang; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Yuanyuan Zhang; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  GPS Assay Association With Long-Term Cancer Outcomes: Twenty-Year Risk of Distant Metastasis and Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.

Authors:  Michael A Brooks; Lewis Thomas; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jianbo Li; Michael R Crager; Ruixiao Lu; John Abran; Tamer Aboushwareb; Eric A Klein
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-24

3.  Prostate cancer in young men represents a distinct clinical phenotype: gene expression signature to predict early metastases.

Authors:  Yuan C Ding; Huiqing Wu; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes; Eric A Klein; Robert B Den; Linda Steele; Susan L Neuhausen
Journal:  J Transl Genet Genom       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Gabe Rohmann; Robert Galbreath; Whitney Scholl; Ryan Fiano; Abbey Bennett; Wayne M Butler; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-11-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.