Literature DB >> 31250534

Difficulties arising in reimbursement recommendations on new medicines due to inadequate reporting of population adjustment indirect comparison methods.

Eileen M Holmes1,2, Joy Leahy3, Cathal D Walsh4, Arthur White3,5, Peter T Donnan1, Felicity Lamrock3.   

Abstract

Indirect treatment comparisons are useful to estimate relative treatment effects when head-to-head studies are not conducted. Statisticians at the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics Ireland (NCPE) and Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of new medicines as part of multidisciplinary teams. We describe some shared observations on areas where reporting of population-adjustment indirect comparison methods is causing uncertainty in our recommendations to decision-making committees when assessing reimbursement of medicines.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  decision making; evidence synthesis; population-adjusted indirect comparisons; statistical models

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31250534     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  2 in total

1.  Critical Appraisal of Published Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses of Competing Interventions for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Shannon Cope; Kabirraaj Toor; Evan Popoff; Rafael Fonseca; Ola Landgren; María-Victoria Mateos; Katja Weisel; Jeroen Paul Jansen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Coronavirus Disease 2019: Considerations for Health Technology Assessment From the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics Review Group.

Authors:  Joy Leahy; Conor Hickey; David McConnell; Owen Cassidy; Lea Trela-Larsen; Michael Barry; Lesley Tilson; Laura McCullagh
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 5.725

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.