| Literature DB >> 31250534 |
Eileen M Holmes1,2, Joy Leahy3, Cathal D Walsh4, Arthur White3,5, Peter T Donnan1, Felicity Lamrock3.
Abstract
Indirect treatment comparisons are useful to estimate relative treatment effects when head-to-head studies are not conducted. Statisticians at the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics Ireland (NCPE) and Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of new medicines as part of multidisciplinary teams. We describe some shared observations on areas where reporting of population-adjustment indirect comparison methods is causing uncertainty in our recommendations to decision-making committees when assessing reimbursement of medicines.Keywords: decision making; evidence synthesis; population-adjusted indirect comparisons; statistical models
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31250534 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Synth Methods ISSN: 1759-2879 Impact factor: 5.273