Literature DB >> 3125013

Oxygen cost of breathing in postoperative patients. Pressure support ventilation vs continuous positive airway pressure.

J P Viale1, G J Annat, Y M Bouffard, B X Delafosse, O M Bertrand, J P Motin.   

Abstract

In seven postoperative patients with normal preoperative pulmonary function tests, we evaluated the oxygen cost of breathing (VO2resp) during continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPAP) and during a 15 cm H2O inspiratory pressure support ventilation (IPSV). For both periods, VO2 resp was estimated as the difference between total oxygen uptake of the period (VO2tot), measured by a mass-spectrometer system, and that during controlled ventilation. During CPAP ventilation, VO2resp was found to be 11.2 +/- 1.4 percent of VO2tot. During IPSV, VO2resp was found insignificant. It is concluded that a 15 cm H2O IPSV takes over the major part of the work of breathing in postoperative patients without preexisting pulmonary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3125013     DOI: 10.1378/chest.93.3.506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the breathing workload in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  G Annat; J P Viale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Hypothesis: Fever control, a niche for alpha-2 agonists in the setting of septic shock and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Authors:  F Petitjeans; S Leroy; C Pichot; A Geloen; M Ghignone; L Quintin
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2018-05-22

3.  Influence of SIMV plus inspiratory pressure support on VA/Q distributions during postoperative weaning.

Authors:  B Santak; P Radermacher; W Sandmann; K J Falke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Effect of pressure support ventilation on breathing patterns and respiratory work.

Authors:  H Tokioka; S Saito; F Kosaka
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Inspiratory pressure support: does it make a clinical difference?

Authors:  R M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Energy metabolism of infants and children with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis.

Authors:  R A Turi; A J Petros; S Eaton; L Fasoli; M Powis; R Basu; L Spitz; A Pierro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Non-invasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.

Authors:  R Agarwal; A N Aggarwal; D Gupta; S K Jindal
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs. intermittent mandatory pressure release ventilation (IMPRV) in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  J J Rouby; M Ben Ameur; D Jawish; A Cherif; A Andreev; S Dreux; P Viars
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  A Alberti; F Gallo; A Fongaro; S Valenti; A Rossi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Tidal volume, breathing frequency, and oxygen consumption at different pressure support levels in the early stage of weaning in patients without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  C Hörmann; M Baum; G Luz; C Putensen; G Putz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.