| Literature DB >> 31249820 |
Vahid Naseri-Salahshour1, Hamid Abredari2, Mahbobeh Sajadi3, Masoumeh Sabzaligol4, Mahmood Karimy5.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of different models play a significant role in health education and its promotion. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the effect of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) on early dental decay in elementary students.Entities:
Keywords: Dental decay; Health promotion; Nursing education; Oral health; prevention
Year: 2019 PMID: 31249820 PMCID: PMC6589486 DOI: 10.15171/jcs.2019.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Caring Sci ISSN: 2251-9920
Figure 1Demographic information of the intervention and control group samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age | 11.92 (4.3) | 12.14 (4.8) | 0.21* |
| Sex | |||
| Girl | 112 (23.93) | 127 (26.90) | 0.12** |
| Boy | 122 (26.06%) | 109 (23.09) | |
| Educational degree | |||
| Forth degree | 74 (15.81) | 67 (14.19) | 0.28** |
| Fifth degree | 84 (17.79) | 84 (17.79) | |
| Sixth degree | 76 (16.23) | 85 (18) | |
| Decayed and missing teeth | |||
| 0 tooth | 62 (13.24) | 59 (12.5) | 0.13** |
| 1 tooth | 37 (7.90) | 41 (17.37) | |
| 2 tooth | 34 (7.26) | 32 (6.77) | |
| 3 tooth | 35 (7.47) | 31 (6.56) | |
| 4 tooth | 41 (8.76) | 40 (8.47) | |
| 5 tooth | 25 (5.34) | 33 (6.99) | |
| Fathers level of education | |||
| Primary education | 185 (41.8) | 173 (38.11) | 0.21** |
| Academic education | 36 (8.13) | 54 (11.93) | |
| Mothers level of education | |||
| Primary education | 127 (27.84) | 142 (30.61) | 0.09** |
| Academic education | 101 (22.14) | 90 (19.39) | |
| Fathers job | |||
| Employee | 198 (44.79) | 210 (46.25) | 0.19** |
| Workless | 23 (5.20) | 17 (3.74) | |
| Mothers job | |||
| Employee | 96 (21.05) | 101 (21.76) | 0.26** |
| Housewife | 132 (28.94) | 131 (28.23) | |
| Visited by dentist | |||
| Yes | 179 (38.24) | 186 (39.40) | 0.18** |
| No | 55 (11.75) | 50 (10.59) |
*Independent t-test, **Chi-square
Comparison of the intervention and control groups in terms of the TPB structural component
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
| Awareness | Intervention | 3.96 (2.2) | 7.34 (2.3) | 7.18 (2.5) | 0.001b | 0.18b | <0.001c |
| Control | 4.68 (2.1) | 3.89 (1.3) | 2.52 (1.2) | 0.62b | 0.17b | 0.10c | |
| Pa | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||
| Attitude | Intervention | 8.61 (2.3) | 11.61 (2.9) | 10.94 (3.1) | 0.01a | 0.13b | 0.001c |
| Control | 8.93 (2.3) | 7.94 (2.3) | 8.29 (2.3) | 0.42a | 0.86b | 0.21c | |
| Pa | 0.19 | 0.001 | 0.01 | ||||
| Tooth brushing practice | Intervention | 9.61 (2.1) | 13.35 (4.4) | 12.68 (4.0) | 0.001a | 0.25b | <0.001c |
| Control | 10.12 (2.1) | 8.27 (1.8) | 7.39 (2.1) | 0.24a | 0.16b | 0.76c | |
| Pa | 0.56 | 0.001 | 0.01 | ||||
| Dietary regime practice | Intervention | 26.29 (5.3) | 39.21 (9.3) | 37.24 (11.9) | <0.001a | 0.12b | <0.001c |
| Control | 30.21 (3.1) | 25.33 (2.9) | 22.94 (3.0) | 0.32a | 0.38b | 0.58c | |
| Pa | 0.85 | 0.001 | 0.01 | ||||
| Referring to dentist practice | Intervention | 3.62 (1.1) | 5.97 (1.6) | 4.16 (2.6) | <0.001a | 0.27b | 0.001c |
| Control | 2.86 (1.1) | 3.09 (1.1) | 2.12 (1.5) | 0.37a | 0.28b | 0.19c | |
| Pa | 0.67 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||
*Repeated measure ANOVA, at-test, bpre-test and immediately after intervention, cimmediately after intervention and 1 month after intervention, dpre-test and 1 month after intervention