A Jhaveri1, A Amirabadi1, P Dirks2, A V Kulkarni2, M M Shroff1, N Shkumat1, T Krings3, V M Pereira3, V Rea1, P Muthusami4. 1. From Pediatric Neuroradiology and Image Guided Therapy (A.J., A.A., M.M.S., N.S., V.R., P.M.), Diagnostic Imaging. 2. Division of Neurosurgery (P.D., A.V.K.), Department of Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Divisions of Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery (T.K.,V.M.P.), Departments of Medical Imaging and Surgery, University of Toronto, and Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. From Pediatric Neuroradiology and Image Guided Therapy (A.J., A.A., M.M.S., N.S., V.R., P.M.), Diagnostic Imaging Prakash.muthusami@sickkids.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRI is routinely performed following brain AVM after treatment in children. Our aim was to determine the predictive values of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and TOF-MRA for brain AVM recurrence in children, compared with conventional angiography and the role of 3D rotational angiography-MR imaging fusion in these cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all pediatric patients with brain AVMs during an 18-year period with angiographically documented obliteration after treatment. Patients underwent 3T MR imaging, including contrast-enhanced MR imaging, TOF-MRA, and conventional angiography, with a subset undergoing 3D rotational angiography. The predictive values of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and TOF-MRA for brain AVM recurrence were determined. CTA sections reconstructed from 3D rotational angiography were coregistered with and fused to 3D-T1WI for analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children (10.8 ± 3.9 years of age; range, 2-17 years; male/female ratio, 19:20; mean Spetzler-Martin grade, 1.9 ± 0.6) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 13 had angiographically confirmed brain AVM recurrence, 8 following surgery and 5 following embolization. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for recurrence were the following: contrast-enhanced MR imaging: 84.6%, 38.5%, 40.7%, 81.8%; TOF-MRA: 50.0%, 96.1%, 85.7%, 79.3%; both: 75.0%, 90.9%, 85.7%, 83.3%. 3D rotational angiography-MR imaging fused images confirmed or excluded recurrence in all available cases (13/13). Embolization-only treatment was a significant predictor of recurrence (OR = 32.4, P = .006). MR imaging features predictive of recurrence included a tuft of vessels on TOF-MRA and nodular juxtamural/linear enhancement with a draining vein on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging is useful for surveillance after brain AVM treatment in children, but conventional angiography is required for definitive diagnosis of recurrence. TOF-MRA and contrast-enhanced MR imaging provide complementary information for determining brain AVM recurrence and should be interpreted in conjunction. 3D rotational angiography-MR imaging fusion increases the diagnostic confidence regarding brain AVM recurrence and is therefore suited for intraoperative neuronavigation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRI is routinely performed following brain AVM after treatment in children. Our aim was to determine the predictive values of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and TOF-MRA for brain AVM recurrence in children, compared with conventional angiography and the role of 3D rotational angiography-MR imaging fusion in these cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all pediatric patients with brain AVMs during an 18-year period with angiographically documented obliteration after treatment. Patients underwent 3T MR imaging, including contrast-enhanced MR imaging, TOF-MRA, and conventional angiography, with a subset undergoing 3D rotational angiography. The predictive values of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and TOF-MRA for brain AVM recurrence were determined. CTA sections reconstructed from 3D rotational angiography were coregistered with and fused to 3D-T1WI for analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children (10.8 ± 3.9 years of age; range, 2-17 years; male/female ratio, 19:20; mean Spetzler-Martin grade, 1.9 ± 0.6) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 13 had angiographically confirmed brain AVM recurrence, 8 following surgery and 5 following embolization. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for recurrence were the following: contrast-enhanced MR imaging: 84.6%, 38.5%, 40.7%, 81.8%; TOF-MRA: 50.0%, 96.1%, 85.7%, 79.3%; both: 75.0%, 90.9%, 85.7%, 83.3%. 3D rotational angiography-MR imaging fused images confirmed or excluded recurrence in all available cases (13/13). Embolization-only treatment was a significant predictor of recurrence (OR = 32.4, P = .006). MR imaging features predictive of recurrence included a tuft of vessels on TOF-MRA and nodular juxtamural/linear enhancement with a draining vein on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging is useful for surveillance after brain AVM treatment in children, but conventional angiography is required for definitive diagnosis of recurrence. TOF-MRA and contrast-enhanced MR imaging provide complementary information for determining brain AVM recurrence and should be interpreted in conjunction. 3D rotational angiography-MR imaging fusion increases the diagnostic confidence regarding brain AVM recurrence and is therefore suited for intraoperative neuronavigation.
Authors: Janneke van Beijnum; H Bart van der Worp; Dennis R Buis; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; L Jaap Kappelle; Gabriël J E Rinkel; Jan Willem Berkelbach van der Sprenkel; W Peter Vandertop; Ale Algra; Catharina J M Klijn Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Richard C Semelka; Joana Ramalho; Ami Vakharia; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Lauren M Burke; Michael Jay; Miguel Ramalho Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Vikas Gulani; Fernando Calamante; Frank G Shellock; Emanuel Kanal; Scott B Reeder Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Peter B Sporns; Heather J Fullerton; Sarah Lee; Helen Kim; Warren D Lo; Mark T Mackay; Moritz Wildgruber Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 52.329