A de Havenon1, K-H Wong2, A Elkhetali2, J S McNally2, J J Majersik2, N S Rost3. 1. From the Department of Neurology (A.d.H., K.-H.W., A.E., J.S.M., J.J.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah adam.dehavenon@hsc.utah.edu. 2. From the Department of Neurology (A.d.H., K.-H.W., A.E., J.S.M., J.J.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Harvard Medical School (N.S.R.). Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial stiffness is a biomarker of cerebrovascular disease and dementia risk. Studies have shown an association between carotid artery stiffness and increased white matter hyperintensity volume and, as a result, reduced total brain volume on MR imaging, but none have had prolonged follow-up to fully evaluate the slow change seen in white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume with time. Our objective was to determine whether common carotid artery stiffness on sonography accurately predicts white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on MR imaging more than 20 years later. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community study to compare 5 measurements of carotid artery stiffness, including strain, distensibility, compliance, Stiffness index, and pressure-strain elastic modulus, with the white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on a follow-up MR imaging using linear regression. RESULTS: We included 1402 patients enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community study. There was a significant relationship between increasing carotid artery stiffness and both higher white matter hyperintensity volume and lower total brain volume on MR imaging, measured at a mean of 21.5 years later. In multivariable linear regression models, the carotid strain, distensibility, Stiffness index, and pressure-strain elastic modulus were associated with white matter hyperintensity volume. Only compliance was associated with total brain volume in the multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography measurements of carotid artery stiffness are predictive of white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on MR imaging more than 20 years later. The association is more robust for white matter hyperintensity volume than total brain volume. These findings support the role of arterial stiffness as a method for identifying patients at risk of developing white matter hyperintensity volume and as a potential mechanism leading to small-artery disease of the brain.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial stiffness is a biomarker of cerebrovascular disease and dementia risk. Studies have shown an association between carotid artery stiffness and increased white matter hyperintensity volume and, as a result, reduced total brain volume on MR imaging, but none have had prolonged follow-up to fully evaluate the slow change seen in white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume with time. Our objective was to determine whether common carotid artery stiffness on sonography accurately predicts white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on MR imaging more than 20 years later. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community study to compare 5 measurements of carotid artery stiffness, including strain, distensibility, compliance, Stiffness index, and pressure-strain elastic modulus, with the white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on a follow-up MR imaging using linear regression. RESULTS: We included 1402 patients enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Community study. There was a significant relationship between increasing carotid artery stiffness and both higher white matter hyperintensity volume and lower total brain volume on MR imaging, measured at a mean of 21.5 years later. In multivariable linear regression models, the carotid strain, distensibility, Stiffness index, and pressure-strain elastic modulus were associated with white matter hyperintensity volume. Only compliance was associated with total brain volume in the multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography measurements of carotid artery stiffness are predictive of white matter hyperintensity volume and total brain volume on MR imaging more than 20 years later. The association is more robust for white matter hyperintensity volume than total brain volume. These findings support the role of arterial stiffness as a method for identifying patients at risk of developing white matter hyperintensity volume and as a potential mechanism leading to small-artery disease of the brain.
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Mark A van Buchem; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; John D Gotal; Maria K Jonsdottir; Ólafur Kjartansson; Melissa Garcia; Thor Aspelund; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: Brain Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Thomas T van Sloten; Athanase D Protogerou; Ronald M A Henry; Miranda T Schram; Lenore J Launer; Coen D A Stehouwer Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Joel Singer; Julian N Trollor; Bernhard T Baune; Perminder S Sachdev; Evelyn Smith Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Chao-Yu Guo; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; Michelle J Keyes; Joseph A Vita; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-05-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Auke P A Appelman; Lieza G Exalto; Yolanda van der Graaf; Geert Jan Biessels; Willem P T M Mali; Mirjam I Geerlings Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Lewis H Kuller; W T Longstreth; Alice M Arnold; Charles Bernick; R Nick Bryan; Norman J Beauchamp Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Thomas T van Sloten; Gary F Mitchell; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Mark A van Buchem; Palmi V Jonsson; Melissa E Garcia; Tamara B Harris; Ronald M A Henry; Andrew S Levey; Coen D A Stehouwer; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Melinda C Power; Archana P Lamichhane; Duanping Liao; Xiaohui Xu; Clifford R Jack; Rebecca F Gottesman; Thomas Mosley; James D Stewart; Jeff D Yanosky; Eric A Whitsel Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Enrico Ammirati; Francesco Moroni; Marco Magnoni; Maria A Rocca; Roberta Messina; Nicoletta Anzalone; Costantino De Filippis; Isabella Scotti; Francesca Besana; Pietro Spagnolo; Ornella E Rimoldi; Roberto Chiesa; Andrea Falini; Massimo Filippi; Paolo G Camici Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2020-08-20
Authors: Wendy Wang; Faye L Norby; Kristen M George; Alvaro Alonso; Thomas H Mosley; Rebecca F Gottesman; Michelle L Meyer; Pamela L Lutsey Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Chen Botvin Moshe; Salo Haratz; Ramit Ravona-Springer; Anthony Heymann; Lin Hung-Mo; Michal Schnaider Beeri; David Tanne Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 9.951