Literature DB >> 31248744

Family Physical Activity Planning and Child Physical Activity Outcomes: A Randomized Trial.

Ryan E Rhodes1, Chris M Blanchard2, Alison Quinlan3, Patti-Jean Naylor3, Darren E R Warburton4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and high physical fitness are extremely important to the health of children and track to positive health profiles in adulthood. Family-based interventions to improve moderate-to-vigorous physical activity are essential given that children live within a structure of parental influence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a parent planning skills intervention to support child physical activity on the subsequent moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (primary outcome) and fitness of their children across 26 weeks (primary endpoint). STUDY
DESIGN: Two-arm randomized trial with physical activity assessment at baseline 6 weeks, 13 weeks, and 26 weeks and fitness and BMI tests at baseline and 26 weeks from 2012 and 2017. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and two children (aged 6-12 years) who were below international physical activity recommendations at baseline were recruited through advertisements. INTERVENTION: Participants received a planning plus education intervention (n=52) or an education-only intervention (n=50). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was assessed via accelerometry and fitness tests included aerobic fitness, muscular strength, flexibility. BMI was calculated by objectively assessed height and weight.
RESULTS: Generalized linear mixed modeling conducted in 2019 showed that the patterns varied by condition over time (β=-0.05, p<0.05), where children in the planning intervention significantly increased moderate-to-vigorous physical activity compared with the education condition at 6 weeks and 13 weeks but not at 26 weeks. Aerobic fitness (p=0.04, d=0.26) was the only significant health-related physical fitness change between the two groups and favored the planning group over the education group.
CONCLUSIONS: There was initial efficacy of the planning intervention, but effectiveness waned by 26 weeks. These changes appeared to be sufficient for modest changes in aerobic fitness. Future research should aim to improve the maintenance of these early positive changes and assist parents in planning for activities that also include opportunities to improve child musculoskeletal fitness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01882192.
Copyright © 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31248744     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  12 in total

1.  Thinking inside the box: The future of young children's physical activity and the home environment.

Authors:  Chelsea L Kracht; Amanda E Staiano
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Effective and resource-efficient strategies for recruiting families in physical activity, sedentary behavior, nutrition, and obesity prevention research: A systematic review with expert opinion.

Authors:  Justin M Guagliano; Katie L Morton; Claire Hughes; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 10.867

3.  Household chaos, family routines, and young child movement behaviors in the U.S. during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chelsea L Kracht; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Amanda E Staiano
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Household chaos, maternal stress, and maternal health behaviors in the United States during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Chelsea L Kracht; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Amanda E Staiano
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

5.  Cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents before and after the COVID-19 confinement: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rubén López-Bueno; Joaquín Calatayud; Lars Louis Andersen; José Casaña; Yasmín Ezzatvar; José Antonio Casajús; Guillermo Felipe López-Sánchez; Lee Smith
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Considerations for a Social Media Physical Activity Program: Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Katherine Q Scott-Andrews; Annalise Lane; Sarah Rock; Leah E Robinson
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2022-02-14

7.  Family-based habit intervention to promote parent support for child physical activity in Canada: protocol for a randomised trial.

Authors:  Emily R Medd; Mark R Beauchamp; Chris M Blanchard; Valerie Carson; Benjamin Gardner; Darren Er Warburton; Ryan E Rhodes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Parents and children active together: a randomized trial protocol examining motivational, regulatory, and habitual intervention approaches.

Authors:  Stina J Grant; Mark R Beauchamp; Chris M Blanchard; Valerie Carson; Benjamin Gardner; Darren E R Warburton; Ryan E Rhodes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A whole family-based physical activity promotion intervention: findings from the families reporting every step to health (FRESH) pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Justin M Guagliano; Sofie M Armitage; Helen Elizabeth Brown; Emma Coombes; Francesco Fusco; Claire Hughes; Andrew P Jones; Katie L Morton; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Determining Factors in the Use of Urban Parks That Influence the Practice of Physical Activity in Children: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rosario Padial-Ruz; Mª Esther Puga-González; Álvaro Céspedes-Jiménez; David Cabello-Manrique
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.