Literature DB >> 31248549

Association of Multiple Enrichment Criteria With Ischemic and Bleeding Risks Among COMPASS-Eligible Patients.

Arthur Darmon1, Emmanuel Sorbets2, Gregory Ducrocq3, Yedid Elbez1, Jeremie Abtan1, Batric Popovic4, E Magnus Ohman5, Joachim Röther6, Peter F Wilson7, Gilles Montalescot8, Uwe Zeymer9, Deepak L Bhatt10, Philippe Gabriel Steg11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial found clinical benefit of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin, but at the expense of increased bleeding risk in patients with stable vascular disease.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the balance of ischemic and bleeding risks according to the presence of ≥1 enrichment criteria in "COMPASS-eligible" patients.
METHODS: Key COMPASS selection criteria were applied to identify a COMPASS-eligible population (n = 16,875) from the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) Registry of stable atherothrombotic patients. Ischemic outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Bleeding outcome was serious bleeding (hemorrhagic stroke, hospitalization for bleeding, transfusion).
RESULTS: Patients were categorized according to the enrichment criteria: age >65 years (81.5%), diabetes (41.0%), moderate renal failure (40.2%), peripheral artery disease (33.7%), current smoker (13.8%), heart failure (13.3%), ischemic stroke (11.1%), and asymptomatic carotid stenosis (8.7%). Each criterion was associated with a consistent increase in ischemic and bleeding events, but no individual subgroup derived a more favorable trade-off. Patients with multiple criteria had a dramatic increase in ischemic risk (7.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.6% to 8.7%], 12.5% [95% CI: 11.1% to 14.1%], 16.6% [95% CI: 14.7% to 18.6%], and 21.8% [95% CI: 19.9% to 23.9%] with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 enrichment criteria, respectively), but a more modest absolute increase in bleeding risk (1.5% [95% CI: 0.9% to 2.1%], 1.8% [95% CI: 1.3% to 2.2%], 2.0% [95% CI: 1.5% to 2.6%], 3.2% [95% CI: 2.6% to 3.9%]).
CONCLUSIONS: In a population of stable vascular patients at high risk of atherothrombotic events, the subset with multiple enrichment criteria had a greater absolute increase in ischemic than in bleeding risk and may be good candidates for low-dose rivaroxaban in addition to aspirin.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COMPASS trial; REACH Registry; bleeding risk; ischemic risk; rivaroxaban

Year:  2019        PMID: 31248549     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rivaroxaban: A Review for Secondary CV Prevention in CAD and PAD.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary and Peripheral Artery Disease Antithrombotic Treatments in Finland.

Authors:  Erkki Soini; Outi Virtanen; Saku Väätäinen; Jean-Baptiste Briere; Kevin Bowrin; Aurelie Millier
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Clinical implications of the log linear association between LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular risk reduction: Greatest benefits when LDL-C >100 mg/dl.

Authors:  Jennifer G Robinson; Manju Bengaluru Jayanna; C Noel Bairey Merz; Neil J Stone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Long-term residual cardiovascular risk after acute coronary syndrome: antithrombotic treatment options.

Authors:  D R P P Chan Pin Yin; J M Ten Berg
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.