| Literature DB >> 31247955 |
Eduardo Aguirre1, Inés Beperet2, Trevor Williams3, Primitivo Caballero4,5.
Abstract
Genetic variation in baculoviruses is recognized as a key factor, not only due to the influence of such variation on pathogen transmission and virulence traits, but also because genetic variants can form the basis for novel biological insecticides. In this study, we examined the genetic variability of Chrysodeixis includens nucleopolyhedrovirus (ChinNPV) present in field isolates obtained from virus-killed larvae. Different ChinNPV strains were identified by restriction endonuclease analysis, from which genetic variants were isolated by plaque assay. Biological characterization studies were based on pathogenicity, median time to death (MTD), and viral occlusion body (OB) production (OBs/larva). Nine different isolates were obtained from eleven virus-killed larvae collected from fields of soybean in Mexico. An equimolar mixture of these isolates, named ChinNPV-Mex1, showed good insecticidal properties and yielded 23 genetic variants by plaque assay, one of which (ChinNPV-R) caused the highest mortality in second instars of C. includens. Five of these variants were selected: ChinNPV-F, ChinNPV-J, ChinNPV-K, ChinNPV-R, and ChinNPV-V. No differences in median time to death were found between them, while ChinNPV-F, ChinNPV-K, ChinNPV-R and ChinNPV-V were more productive than ChinNPV-J and the original mixture of field isolates ChinNPV-Mex1. These results demonstrate the high variability present in natural populations of this virus and support the use of these new genetic variants as promising active substances for baculovirus-based bioinsecticides.Entities:
Keywords: bioassay; bioinsecticide; genetic variants; pathogenicity; plaque assay; speed-of-kill
Year: 2019 PMID: 31247955 PMCID: PMC6669620 DOI: 10.3390/v11070581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Restriction endonuclease profiles of the genomic DNA of nine different field isolates from virus-killed larvae (a) EcoRI, (b) HindIII and (c) ChinNPV-Mex1 mixture treated with both enzymes. M is the marker and the fragment size is shown in kilobases (Kb) on the left.
Host range for ChinNPV in second instars of different lepidopteran species.
| Species | 5 × 106 OBs/mL | 5 × 108 OBs/mL |
|---|---|---|
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| ++ | +++ |
|
| ++++ | ++++ |
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| N.P. | N.P. |
|
| + | ++++ |
N.P: Non-permissive. Percentage of mortality: + (1 to 25%), ++ (26 to 50%), +++ (51 to 75%), ++++ (76 to 100%).
Results of Probit analysis used to estimate median lethal concentration (LC50) and median time to death (MTD) values for ChinNPV-Mex1 in C. includens second instars and OB production values for ChinNPV-Mex1 in C. includens fifth instars.
| Virus | LC50 * (OBs/mL) | 95% Confidence Limits | MTD (h) | 95% Confidence Limits | OB Production (OBs/larva) | 95% Confidence Limits | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | ||||
|
| 6.5 × 104 | 2.4 × 104 | 2.6 × 105 | 125.0 | 121.8 | 128.2 | 2.2 × 109 | 1.2 × 109 | 3.1 × 109 |
* LC50 value estimated from a regression with slope (±SE) 0.826 ± 0.120 and intercept (±SE) −3.981 ± 0.559 (χ2 goodness-of-fit test = 3.5641, d.f. = 3, heterogeneity = 1.1880).
Figure 2Prevalence of ChinNPV genotypes. Prevalence was calculated as the number of times each genotype was observed in 23 different restriction profiles from 106 clones isolated by plaque assay.
Figure 3Percentage of mortality for each of the ChinNPV genotypic variants (A–W) and the ChinNPV-Mex1 mixture in C. includens second instars inoculated with 104 OBs/mL. Error bars indicate the standard error.
Homogeneous subset based on mortality following inoculation with ChinNPV genotypic variants.
| Variants | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 290.080 | ||||||||||
| A | 546.503 | ||||||||||
| L | 679.357 | 679.357 | |||||||||
| K | 811.045 | 811.045 | |||||||||
| M | 821.033 | 821.033 | |||||||||
| E | 948.565 | 948.565 | |||||||||
| S | 983.034 | 983.034 | |||||||||
| D | 983.703 | 983.703 | |||||||||
| Q | 1035.547 | ||||||||||
| V | 1267.990 | ||||||||||
| O | 1282.400 | 1282.400 | |||||||||
| B | 1304.449 | 1304.449 | 1304.449 | ||||||||
| I | 1392.007 | 1392.007 | 1392.007 | ||||||||
| N | 1413.618 | 1413.618 | 1413.618 | ||||||||
| U | 1449.109 | 1449.109 | 1449.109 | 1449.109 | |||||||
| C | 1451.831 | 1451.831 | 1451.831 | ||||||||
| F | 1467.757 | 1467.757 | 1467.757 | ||||||||
| G | 1664.041 | 1664.041 | |||||||||
| T | 1669.211 | ||||||||||
| H | 1670.921 | ||||||||||
| J | 2008.000 | ||||||||||
| W | 2181.689 | ||||||||||
| R | 2409.836 | ||||||||||
| Test statistic | 0.0 1 | 3.078 | 2.236 | 7.309 | 5.246 | 7.014 | 10.204 | 11.173 | 10.290 | 1.068 | 0.0 1 |
| Sig.(2 sided test) | 0.0 | 0.215 | 0.327 | 0.063 | 0.155 | 0.220 | 0.116 | 0.083 | 0.067 | 0.301 | 0.0 |
| Adjusted Sig. (2 sided test) | 0.0 | 0.843 | 0.952 | 0.311 | 0.619 | 0.613 | 0.334 | 0.248 | 0.235 | 0.984 | 0.0 |
Homogeneous subsets are based on asymptotic significances (p = 0.05). Each cell shows the sample average rank of Mortality. 1 Unable to compute because the subset contains only one sample.
MTD values of genotypic variants estimated in C. includens second instars.
| Variant | MTD (h) | 95% Confidence Limits | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | ||
| ChinNPV-F | 125 | 120.3 | 129.7 |
| ChinNPV-J | 125 | 120.4 | 129.6 |
| ChinNPV-K | 119 | 115.5 | 122.5 |
| ChinNPV-R | 125 | 120.4 | 129.6 |
| ChinNPV-V | 119 | 115.7 | 122.3 |
| ChinNPV-Mex1 | 125 | 121.8 | 128.2 |
Figure 4Mean OB production values of ChinNPV-Mex1 and selected genotypic variants in C. includens fifth instars. Error bars indicate the standard error. Columns headed by identical letters did not differ significantly (Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05).