| Literature DB >> 31247925 |
Menéndez-Aguado L D1, Marina Sánchez M2, Rodríguez M A1, Coello Velázquez A L3, Menéndez-Aguado J M4.
Abstract
Mining activities in general, and quarrying processes in particular, generate huge amounts of tailings with a considerable presence of fine particles and with a variable composition of minerals, which could limit the direct application of those wastes. Under the paradigm of a circular economy, more effort has to be made to find adequate applications for those secondary raw materials. In this study, a process was proposed and tests were performed to valorise fine particle product as a raw material for the building and construction industry. Samples were taken from wastes in several aggregate production plants, being characterized and processed to remove the clayey components to obtain the cleanest quartz fraction. Then, different characterization and validation tests were carried out to analyse the application of these products as raw materials in the building and construction industry (cement and ceramics). Results showed that with no complex technologies, the tailings can be considered as a mineral raw material in different applications.Entities:
Keywords: aggregates; fines processing; waste
Year: 2019 PMID: 31247925 PMCID: PMC6651755 DOI: 10.3390/ma12132047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Mortars prepared replacing sand by cleaned product.
| Sand Substitution (%) | Normalized Sand (g) | Cement (g) | Water (g) | Cleaned Product (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 700 | 233 | 116.5 | 0 |
| 5 | 665 | 233 | 116.5 | 35 |
| 10 | 630 | 233 | 116.5 | 70 |
| 15 | 595 | 233 | 116.5 | 105 |
| 20 | 560 | 233 | 116.5 | 140 |
Quartz sand specifications.
| Material | Fe2O3 (%) | TiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | K2O (%) | CaO (%) | D90 (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enamel | <0.06 | <0.06 | <0.7 | <0.2 | <0.2 | 150 |
| Ingobbio | <0.06 | <0.06 | <0.7 | <0.2 | <0.2 | 63–125 |
| Ceramic pastes (porous/gres/porcelain) | <0.15 | <0.1 | 3–7 | 2–5 | <0.3 | 100 µm–6 mm * |
* Depending on the preparation process.
Chemical composition in the basis clay material.
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | TiO2 | CaO | MgO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.05 | 64.71 | 3.89 | 0.84 | 0.15 | 0.61 | 0.18 | 4.03 | 0.13 | 6.42 |
Samples prepared to the thermal study.
| Cast Cylinder | Clay (g) | Recycled Product (g) | Water (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | 0 | 30 |
| 2 | 100 | 0 | 30 |
| 3 | 95 | 0 | 30 |
| 4 | 90 | 0 | 32 |
| 5 | 70 | 0 | 33 |
| 6 | 95 | 5 | 32 |
| 7 | 90 | 10 | 31 |
| 8 | 80 | 20 | 30 |
| 9 | 70 | 30 | 30 |
Figure 1Mineralogical analysis result.
Figure 2Particle size distribution.
Major components in the sample (%).
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | TiO2 | CaO | MgO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.49 | 89.42 | 0.73 | 0.67 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.03 | 1.10 | <0.1 | 1.54 |
ICP-OES trace elements results (mg/kg).
| As | Ba | Sr | Sb | Co | Cr | Cu | Cd | Hg | Pb | Zn | Zr | Ni | Mn | Sn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 142 | 15 | <10 | 14 | 31 | 22 | <10 | <10 | <10 | <10 | 85 | <10 | 17 | <10 |
Leach test results (mg/kg).
| As | Ba | Sr | Sb | Co | Cr | Cu | Cd | Hg | Pb | Zn | Zr | Ni | Mn | Sn | Al | Fe | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 | 17 | 6 | 27 |
Underflow fraction results after 3 treatments.
| Product | Al2O3 | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | TiO2 | CaO | MgO | K2O | P2O5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed | 6.49 | 89.42 | 0.73 | 0.67 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 1.10 | <0.1 |
| Underflow, treatment 1 | 2.19 | 96.51 | 0.11 | 0.48 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.31 | <0.1 |
| Underflow, treatment 2 | 1.16 | 96.92 | 0.07 | 0.45 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.15 | <0.1 |
| Underflow, treatment 3 | 0.92 | 98.05 | 0.05 | 0.42 | <0.1 | <0.1 | 0.1 | <0.1 |
| Underflow, treatment 4 | 0.89 | 98.12 | 0.04 | 0.41 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 | <0.1 |
Figure 3Variation of mean particle size with treatments.
Compression tests results.
| Substitution of Recycled Sand (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | |
|
| 35.4 | 35.1 | 34.9 | 34.7 | 34.6 |
| 35.2 | 35.2 | 35.1 | 34.8 | 34.5 | |
| 35.3 | 35.1 | 35.1 | 34.9 | 34.7 | |
|
| 35.3 | 35.1 | 35.0 | 34.8 | 34.6 |
|
| – | 0.5% | 0.8% | 1.4% | 2.0% |
Figure 4Variation in compression strength due to product addition.
Figure 5Variation of whiteness index L* with number of cleaning stages.
Figure 6Variation of plasticity parameters.
Figure 7Mass variation with temperature at different recycled product content.
Figure 8Mass variation at 900 °C.
Figure 9Dimensional variation at 300 °C, 300–600 °C, and 600–900 °C.