Literature DB >> 31247300

Recommendations for motion correction of infant fNIRS data applicable to multiple data sets and acquisition systems.

Renata Di Lorenzo1, Laura Pirazzoli2, Anna Blasi3, Chiara Bulgarelli4, Yoko Hakuno5, Yasuyo Minagawa6, Sabrina Brigadoi7.   

Abstract

Despite motion artifacts are a major source of noise in fNIRS infant data, how to approach motion correction in this population has only recently started to be investigated. Homer2 offers a wide range of motion correction methods and previous work on simulated and adult data suggested the use of Spline interpolation and Wavelet filtering as optimal methods for the recovery of trials affected by motion. However, motion artifacts in infant data differ from those in adults' both in amplitude and frequency of occurrence. Therefore, artifact correction recommendations derived from adult data might not be optimal for infant data. We hypothesized that the combined use of Spline and Wavelet would outperform their individual use on data with complex profiles of motion artifacts. To demonstrate this, we first compared, on infant semi-simulated data, the performance of several motion correction techniques on their own and of the novel combined approach; then, we investigated the performance of Spline and Wavelet alone and in combination on real cognitive data from three datasets collected with infants of different ages (5, 7 and 10 months), with different tasks (auditory, visual and tactile) and with different NIRS systems. To quantitatively estimate and compare the efficacy of these techniques, we adopted four metrics: hemodynamic response recovery error, within-subject standard deviation, between-subjects standard deviation and number of trials that survived each correction method. Our results demonstrated that (i) it is always better correcting for motion artifacts than rejecting the corrupted trials; (ii) Wavelet filtering on its own and in combination with Spline interpolation seems to be the most effective approach in reducing the between- and the within-subject standard deviations. Importantly, the combination of Spline and Wavelet was the approach providing the best performance in semi-simulation both at low and high levels of noise, also recovering most of the trials affected by motion artifacts across all datasets, a crucial result when working with infant data.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infants; Motion correction; Semi-simulated data; fNIRS

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31247300     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  Optical imaging and spectroscopy for the study of the human brain: status report.

Authors:  Hasan Ayaz; Wesley B Baker; Giles Blaney; David A Boas; Heather Bortfeld; Kenneth Brady; Joshua Brake; Sabrina Brigadoi; Erin M Buckley; Stefan A Carp; Robert J Cooper; Kyle R Cowdrick; Joseph P Culver; Ippeita Dan; Hamid Dehghani; Anna Devor; Turgut Durduran; Adam T Eggebrecht; Lauren L Emberson; Qianqian Fang; Sergio Fantini; Maria Angela Franceschini; Jonas B Fischer; Judit Gervain; Joy Hirsch; Keum-Shik Hong; Roarke Horstmeyer; Jana M Kainerstorfer; Tiffany S Ko; Daniel J Licht; Adam Liebert; Robert Luke; Jennifer M Lynch; Jaume Mesquida; Rickson C Mesquita; Noman Naseer; Sergio L Novi; Felipe Orihuela-Espina; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Darcy S Peterka; Antonio Pifferi; Luca Pollonini; Angelo Sassaroli; João Ricardo Sato; Felix Scholkmann; Lorenzo Spinelli; Vivek J Srinivasan; Keith St Lawrence; Ilias Tachtsidis; Yunjie Tong; Alessandro Torricelli; Tara Urner; Heidrun Wabnitz; Martin Wolf; Ursula Wolf; Shiqi Xu; Changhuei Yang; Arjun G Yodh; Meryem A Yücel; Wenjun Zhou
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.212

2.  Can tactile reactivity in preterm born infants be explained by an immature cortical response to tactile stimulation in the first year? A pilot study.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Cabral de Paula Machado; Lívia de Castro Magalhães; Suelen Rosa de Oliveira; Sérgio Luiz Novi; Rickson C Mesquita; Débora Marques de Miranda; Maria Cândida F Bouzada
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Shining a light on cultural neuroscience: Recommendations on the use of fNIRS to study how sociocultural contexts shape the brain.

Authors:  Maria M Arredondo
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2021-07-22

4.  Hearing brain evaluated using near-infrared spectroscopy in congenital toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  Ana Lívia Libardi Bertachini; Gabriela Cintra Januario; Sergio Luiz Novi; Rickson Coelho Mesquita; Marco Aurélio Romano Silva; Gláucia Manzan Queiroz Andrade; Luciana Macedo de Resende; Débora Marques de Miranda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  A Methodological Review of fNIRS in Driving Research: Relevance to the Future of Autonomous Vehicles.

Authors:  Stephanie Balters; Joseph M Baker; Joseph W Geeseman; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Language Experience Impacts Brain Activation for Spoken and Signed Language in Infancy: Insights From Unimodal and Bimodal Bilinguals.

Authors:  Evelyne Mercure; Samuel Evans; Laura Pirazzoli; Laura Goldberg; Harriet Bowden-Howl; Kimberley Coulson-Thaker; Indie Beedie; Sarah Lloyd-Fox; Mark H Johnson; Mairéad MacSweeney
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2020-04-06

7.  Effects of Tai Chi Chuan on Inhibitory Control in Elderly Women: An fNIRS Study.

Authors:  Yuan Yang; Tingting Chen; Mingming Shao; Shoufu Yan; Guang H Yue; Changhao Jiang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Precision Medicine in Neonates: A Tailored Approach to Neonatal Brain Injury.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Tataranno; Daniel C Vijlbrief; Jeroen Dudink; Manon J N L Benders
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Longitudinal infant fNIRS channel-space analyses are robust to variability parameters at the group-level: An image reconstruction investigation.

Authors:  Liam H Collins-Jones; Robert J Cooper; Chiara Bulgarelli; Anna Blasi; Laura Katus; Samantha McCann; Luke Mason; Ebrima Mbye; Ebou Touray; Mohammed Ceesay; Sophie E Moore; Sarah Lloyd-Fox; Clare E Elwell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  So young, yet so mature? Electrophysiological and vascular correlates of phonotactic processing in 18-month-olds.

Authors:  Sarah Steber; Sonja Rossi
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.