Literature DB >> 31247054

Malocclusion and Temporomandibular Disorders: Verification of the Controversy.

Amira A Aboalnaga, Nehal M Amer, Mohamed O Elnahas, Mona M Salah Fayed, Sanaa A Soliman, Amr E ElDakroury, Amr H Labib, Fady H Fahim.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the dental and skeletal aspects of malocclusion in the anteroposterior and vertical dimensions in a sample of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients and to correlate these aspects with the signs and symptoms of TMD.
METHODS: A total of 150 TMD patients were divided into five groups according to the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD: Group 1 = myalgia (M); Group 2 = disc displacement with reduction (DDWR); Group 3 = disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR); Group 4 = degenerative disorders (D); and Group 5 = subluxation (S). Molar and canine relations, overjet, overbite, occlusal guidance, occlusal interferences, and centric slides were recorded for each patient, and the skeletal craniofacial patterns were analyzed for each patient using cone beam computed tomography. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the variable means of the different groups. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlations of quantitative continuous variables. Significance level was considered at P < .05.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found among the groups regarding any aspects of dental occlusion except for mediotrusive interferences, which were significantly higher in Group 3 (DDWOR) (P = .02). Regarding skeletal craniofacial pattern, Group 4 (D) had significantly smaller mean ± standard deviation sella-nasion-B (SNB) point angle (74.31 ± 3.04 degrees) than Group 3 (DDWOR) (78.04 ± 4.88 degrees), and Group 1 (M) showed the greatest SNB angle (79.87 ± 3.73 degrees) (P = .03). Group 3 (DDWOR) showed significantly greater mean mandibular plane/SN angle (39.56 ± 6.19 degrees) than Group 1 (M) (34.73 ± 5.65 degrees) (P = .04). Relations between occlusal variables and TMD parameters were nonsignificant.
CONCLUSION: This study provides robust evidence to diminish the TMD-malocclusion association, especially in myogenic types of TMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31247054     DOI: 10.11607/ofph.2260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Facial Pain Headache


  5 in total

1.  TMJ Position in Symmetric Dentofacial Deformity.

Authors:  Victor Ravelo; Gabriela Olate; Marcio de Moraes; Henry Garcia Guevara; Marcelo Parra; Sergio Olate
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and its association with malocclusion in children: A transversal study.

Authors:  Monica Macrì; Giovanna Murmura; Antonio Scarano; Felice Festa
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-09

3.  Psychological Profiles and Their Relevance with Temporomandibular Disorder Symptoms in Preorthodontic Patients.

Authors:  Chengxinyue Ye; Xin Xiong; Yuyao Zhang; Dan Pu; Jie Zhang; Shufang Du; Jun Wang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.667

4.  The effect of tooth cusp morphology and grinding direction on TMJ loading during bruxism.

Authors:  Benedikt Sagl; Martina Schmid-Schwap; Eva Piehslinger; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Ian Stavness
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Knowledge and Attitude towards Orthodontic Treatment among Non-Orthodontic Specialists: An Online Survey in Croatia.

Authors:  Sandra Brkanović; Marina Lapter Varga; Senka Meštrović
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.