Literature DB >> 31246827

The Influence of Four Different Treatment Protocols on Maxillofacial Growth in Patients with Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip, Palate, and Alveolus.

Xue Xu1, Congcong Cao1, Qian Zheng1, Bing Shi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of four different treatment protocols on maxillofacial growth in patients aged 7 to 8 years with unilateral complete cleft lip, palate, and alveolus.
METHODS: Sixty-one patients with nonsyndromic unilateral complete cleft lip, palate, and alveolus were entered into this study and grouped as follows: group 1 patients had a repaired lip and an unrepaired palate; group 2 patients underwent one-stage palatoplasty; group 3 patients underwent two-stage palatoplasty; and group 4 patients underwent lip adhesion and two-stage palatoplasty. The control group was composed of 16 patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the nature of data distribution. The Bonferroni test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: Group 5 showed a more protruding maxilla (basion-nasion-A point, basion-nasion-anterior nasal spine, sella-nasion-anterior nasal spine; p < 0.05), longer maxillary sagittal length (anterior nasal spine-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05) and maxillary basal sagittal length (A point-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05), and a better jaw relationship (A point-nasion-B point angle; p < 0.05) than groups 2, 3, and 4. Group 2 had higher anterior facial height (anterior nasal spine-nasion, anterior nasal spine-menton, nasion-menton; p < 0.05) and posterior facial height (registration point-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05) than groups 3 and 4. Groups 2 and 3 had better maxillary position (sella-pterygomaxillary fissure; p < 0.05) and deeper bony pharynx (basion-posterior maxillary point; p < 0.05) than group 4.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged 7 to 8 years with unilateral complete cleft lip, palate, and alveolus, both one- and two-stage palatoplasty inhibited maxillary sagittal growth. Vomer flap repair with denuded bone inhibited maxillary vertical growth. Lip adhesion did adversely affect maxilla position. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31246827     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  2 in total

1.  A nationwide cohort study on growth impairment by cleft lip with or without palate.

Authors:  Jeong Yeop Ryu; Tae Hyun Park; Joon Seok Lee; Jung Dug Yang; Ho Yun Chung; Byung Chae Cho; Kang Young Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Craniofacial Growth at Age 6-11 Years after One-Stage Cleft Lip and Palate Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Historical Controls.

Authors:  Benito K Benitez; Seraina K Weibel; Florian S Halbeisen; Yoriko Lill; Prasad Nalabothu; Ana Tache; Andreas A Mueller
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.