Literature DB >> 31246807

Influence of Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index on the Thickness of the Gluteal Subcutaneous Fat: Implications for Safe Buttock Augmentation Procedures.

Konstantin Frank1, Gabriela Casabona1, Robert H Gotkin1, Kai O Kaye1, Paul Z Lorenc1, Thilo L Schenck1, Nirusha Lachman1, Jeremy B Green1, Héctor Duran-Vega1, Sebastian Cotofana1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The deep intramuscular approach during buttock augmentation with fat grafting has been associated with a significantly increased risk for pulmonary fat embolism. This study was designed to provide guidance for injection into the subcutaneous fat.
METHODS: The authors investigated 150 Caucasian individuals with an equal distribution of men and women (n = 75 each) and a balanced distribution of age (n = 30 per decade: 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 69 years) and body mass index (n = 50 per group: ≤24.9 kg/m, between 25.0 and 29.9kg/m, and ≥30 kg/m). Ultrasound-based measurements were conducted of the thickness of the total, superficial, and deep gluteal fatty layers.
RESULTS: An increase in body mass index of 1.0 kg/m corresponded to an increase of 3 mm of the total gluteal subcutaneous fat of men and a 4-mm increase of the total gluteal subcutaneous fat in women. With increasing age, the thickness of the deep fatty layer increased, whereas with increasing body mass index the thickness of the superficial layer primarily increased. Formulas were generated to estimate the total thickness of the gluteal subcutaneous fatty layer for men [total thickness (in millimeters) = -33.56 + (age × 0.078) + (body mass index × 3.042)] and women [total thickness (in millimeters) = -56.997 + (age × 0.1) + (body mass index × 3.86)].
CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the total thickness of the gluteal subcutaneous fat (i.e., the safe space) allows surgeons to estimate their operating range for cannula motion even if no ultrasound machine is available during buttock augmentation with fat grafting. This can increase safety, potentially reducing the number of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31246807     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Fat Grafting in Buttock Augmentation.

Authors:  Rebecca C O'Neill; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Matthew J Davis; Edward Chamata; Charalambos K Rammos; Sebastian J Winocour
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Gluteal Augmentation with Fat Grafting: Literature Review.

Authors:  De-Hui Che; Zhi-Bo Xiao
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Influence of BMI, Age, and Gender on the Thickness of Most Common Thinned Flaps.

Authors:  Erik Hanson-Viana; Jorge Rojas-Ortiz; Marco A Rendón-Medina; Ricardo C Pacheco-López; Luciano R Ríos-Lara López; Julio Palacios-Juárez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-03-30

4.  [Study of modified subcutaneous lumbar spine index as a predictor for short-term effectiveness in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Yuzhu Xu; Pan Fan; Xuanfei Xu; Feng Jiang; Wei Zhang; Xiangjie Yin; Hang Liu; Peiyang Wang; Yuntao Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-07-15

5.  Severe fat embolism after autologous fat grafting in vaginal tightening and breast augmentation surgery.

Authors:  Chenyu Wang; Xiaojun Wang; Jiuzuo Huang; Nanze Yu; Xiao Long
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.