Literature DB >> 31246744

Factors Impacting Physician Recommendation for Tracheostomy Placement in Pediatric Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Stated Practice.

Colin Blair Meyer-Macaulay1, James Dayre McNally2, Katie O'Hearn3, Sherri Lynne Katz2,3, Bernard Thébaud2,3, Jean-Philippe Vaccani4, Nick Barrowman2,3, Mary-Ann Harrison3, Philippe Jouvet5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the stated practices of qualified Canadian physicians toward tracheostomy for pediatric prolonged mechanical ventilation and whether subspecialty and comorbid conditions impact attitudes toward tracheostomy.
DESIGN: Cross sectional web-based survey.
SUBJECTS: Pediatric intensivists, neonatologists, respirologists, and otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons practicing at 16 tertiary academic Canadian pediatric hospitals.
INTERVENTIONS: Respondents answered a survey based on three cases (Case 1: neonate with bronchopulmonary dysplasia; Cases 2 and 3: children 1 and 10 years old with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, respectively) including a series of alterations in relevant clinical variables.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We compared respondents' likelihood of recommending tracheostomy at 3 weeks of mechanical ventilation and evaluated the effects of various clinical changes on physician willingness to recommend tracheostomy and their impact on preferred timing (≤ 3 wk or > 3 wk of mechanical ventilation). Response rate was 165 of 396 (42%). Of those respondents who indicated they had the expertise, 47 of 121 (38.8%), 23 of 93 (24.7%), and 40 of 87 (46.0%) would recommend tracheostomy at less than or equal to 3 weeks of mechanical ventilation for cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.05 Case 2 vs 3). Upper airway obstruction was associated with increased willingness to recommend earlier tracheostomy. Life-limiting condition, severe neurologic injury, unrepaired congenital heart disease, multiple organ system failure, and noninvasive ventilation were associated with a decreased willingness to recommend tracheostomy.
CONCLUSION: This survey provides insight in to the stated practice patterns of Canadian physicians who care for children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Physicians remain reluctant to recommend tracheostomy for children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation due to lung disease alone at 3 weeks of mechanical ventilation. Prospective studies characterizing actual physician practice toward tracheostomy for pediatric prolonged mechanical ventilation and evaluating the impact of tracheostomy timing on clinically important outcomes are needed as the next step toward harmonizing care delivery for such patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31246744     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  5 in total

1.  Tracheostomy Practices and Outcomes in Children During Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Joseph G Kohne; Graeme MacLaren; Erica Rider; Benjamin D Carr; Palen Mallory; Acham Gebremariam; Matthew L Friedman; Ryan P Barbaro
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.971

2.  Development and validation of a novel informational booklet for pediatric long-term ventilation decision support.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Edwards; Howard B Panitch; Maureen George; Anne-Marie Cirrilla; Eli Grunstein; Joanne Wolfe; Judith E Nelson; Rachel L Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2020-12-23

Review 3.  Update on Pediatric Tracheostomy: Indications, Technique, Education, and Decannulation.

Authors:  Colin Fuller; Andre' M Wineland; Gresham T Richter
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2021-04-15

4.  Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Children-Bypassing the Hurdle and Running into More!

Authors:  Lalit Takia; Muralidharan Jayashree
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Tracheostomy in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-A Two Decades of Experience.

Authors:  Anil Sachdev; Nilay D Chaudhari; Bhanu P Singh; Nikhil Sharma; Dhiren Gupta; Neeraj Gupta; Suresh Gupta; Parul Chugh
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.