Aron S Buchman1,2, Robert J Dawe1,3, Sue E Leurgans1,2, Thomas A Curran1, Timothy Truty1, Lei Yu1, Lisa L Barnes1,2,4, Jeffrey M Hausdorff1,5,6,7,8, David A Bennett1,2. 1. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Neurological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Department of Behavioral Sciences Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Tel Aviv University Medical School Center for the Study of Movement, Cognition, and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. 7. Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Israel. 8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gait speed is a robust nonspecific predictor of health outcomes. We examined if combinations of gait speed and other mobility metrics are associated with specific health outcomes. METHODS: A sensor (triaxial accelerometer and gyroscope) placed on the lower back, measured mobility in the homes of 1,249 older adults (77% female; 80.0, SD = 7.72 years). Twelve gait scores were extracted from five performances, including (a) walking, (b) transition from sit to stand, (c) transition from stand to sit, (d) turning, and (e) standing posture. Using separate Cox proportional hazards models, we examined which metrics were associated with time to mortality, incident activities of daily living disability, mobility disability, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease dementia. We used a single integrated analytic framework to determine which gait scores survived to predict each outcome. RESULTS: During 3.6 years of follow-up, 10 of the 12 gait scores predicted one or more of the five health outcomes. In further analyses, different combinations of 2-3 gait scores survived backward elimination and were associated with the five outcomes. Sway was one of the three scores that predicted activities of daily living disability but was not included in the final models for other outcomes. Gait speed was included along with other metrics in the final models predicting mortality and activities of daily living disability but not for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: When analyzing multiple mobility metrics together, different combinations of mobility metrics are related to specific adverse health outcomes. Digital technology enhances our understanding of impaired mobility and may provide mobility biomarkers that predict distinct health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Gait speed is a robust nonspecific predictor of health outcomes. We examined if combinations of gait speed and other mobility metrics are associated with specific health outcomes. METHODS: A sensor (triaxial accelerometer and gyroscope) placed on the lower back, measured mobility in the homes of 1,249 older adults (77% female; 80.0, SD = 7.72 years). Twelve gait scores were extracted from five performances, including (a) walking, (b) transition from sit to stand, (c) transition from stand to sit, (d) turning, and (e) standing posture. Using separate Cox proportional hazards models, we examined which metrics were associated with time to mortality, incident activities of daily living disability, mobility disability, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease dementia. We used a single integrated analytic framework to determine which gait scores survived to predict each outcome. RESULTS: During 3.6 years of follow-up, 10 of the 12 gait scores predicted one or more of the five health outcomes. In further analyses, different combinations of 2-3 gait scores survived backward elimination and were associated with the five outcomes. Sway was one of the three scores that predicted activities of daily living disability but was not included in the final models for other outcomes. Gait speed was included along with other metrics in the final models predicting mortality and activities of daily living disability but not for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: When analyzing multiple mobility metrics together, different combinations of mobility metrics are related to specific adverse health outcomes. Digital technology enhances our understanding of impaired mobility and may provide mobility biomarkers that predict distinct health outcomes.
Authors: Emer P Doheny; Chie Wei Fan; Timothy Foran; Barry R Greene; Clodagh Cunningham; Rose Anne Kenny Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2011
Authors: Lisa L Barnes; Raj C Shah; Neelum T Aggarwal; David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Robert J Dawe; Sue E Leurgans; Jingyun Yang; Joshua M Bennett; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Andrew S Lim; Chris Gaiteri; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Aner Weiss; Anat Mirelman; Nir Giladi; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Jeffrey M Hausdorff Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Manuel Montero-Odasso; Mark Speechley; Susan W Muir-Hunter; Yanina Sarquis-Adamson; Luciano A Sposato; Vladimir Hachinski; Michael Borrie; Jennie Wells; Alanna Black; Ervin Sejdić; Louis Bherer; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Sue E Leurgans; Aner Weiss; Veronique Vanderhorst; Anat Mirelman; Robert Dawe; Lisa L Barnes; Robert S Wilson; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; David A Bennett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Lei Yu; Shahram Oveisgharan; Vladislav A Petyuk; Shinya Tasaki; Chris Gaiteri; Robert S Wilson; Francine Grodstein; Julie A Schneider; Hans-Ulrich Klein; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Sue E Leurgans; Tianhao Wang; Michal Schnaider-Beeri; Puja Agarwal; Robert J Dawe; Osvaldo Delbono; David A Bennett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Victoria N Poole; Robert J Dawe; Melissa Lamar; Michael Esterman; Lisa Barnes; Sue E Leurgans; David A Bennett; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Aron S Buchman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Karen Van Ooteghem; Kristin E Musselman; Avril Mansfield; David Gold; Meghan N Marcil; Ron Keren; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; Alastair J Flint; Andrea Iaboni Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2019-08-31
Authors: Iván José Fuentes-Abolafio; Brendon Stubbs; Luis Miguel Pérez-Belmonte; María Rosa Bernal-López; Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 3.921