| Literature DB >> 31245454 |
Shinako Masuda1, Katsuhisa Matsuura1, Mie Anazawa1, Takahiro Iwamiya1, Tatsuya Shimizu1, Teruo Okano1.
Abstract
Bioengineered cardiac tissues represent a promising strategy for regenerative medicine. However, methods of vascularization and suitable cell sources for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have not yet been established. In this study, we developed methods for the induction of vascular endothelial cells from mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells using three-dimensional (3D) suspension culture, and fabricated cardiac cell sheets with a pre-vascularized structure by co-culture of mouse ES cell-derived endothelial cells. After induction, isolated CD31+ cells expressed several endothelial cell marker genes and exhibited the ability to form vascular network structures similar to CD31+ cells from neonatal mouse heart. Co-culture of ES cell-derived CD31+ cells with ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes and dermal fibroblasts resulted in the formation of cardiac cell sheets with microvascular network formation. In contrast, microvascular network formation was reduced in co-cultures without cardiomyocytes, suggesting that cardiomyocytes within the cell sheet might enhance vascular endothelial cell sprouting. Polymerase chain reaction array analysis revealed that the expression levels of several angiogenesis-related genes, including fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1), were up-regulated in co-culture with cardiomyocytes compared with cultures without cardiomyocytes. The microvascular network in the cardiac sheets was attenuated by treatment with anti-FGF1 antibody. These results indicate that 3D suspension culture methods may be used to prepare functional vascular endothelial cells from mouse ES cells, and that cardiomyocyte-mediated paracrine effects might be important for fabricating pre-vascularized cardiac cell sheets.Entities:
Keywords: 3D, three-dimensional; Acvrl1, activin receptor like 1; CXCR4, chemokine receptor type 4; Cardiac cell sheet; Col4a3, collagen type IV alpha 3; Cxcl5, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5; Dll4, delta-like ligand 4; ES cell, embryonic stem cell; EYFP, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein; Efnb2, ephrin-B2; Egf, epidermal growth factor; Endothelial cell differentiation; Ephb4, ephrin type-B receptor 4; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FGF1, fibroblast growth factor 1; Fibroblast growth factor 1; Flk1, fetal liver kinase 1; Flt1, fms-related tyrosine kinase 1; Gusb, glucuronidase, beta; KDR, kinase insert domain receptor; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; MACS, magnetic-activated cell sorting; Mdk, midkine; Microvascular network formation; Mouse embryonic stem cells; NEAA, non-essential amino acids; Notch1, Notch homolog 1; Nr2f2, nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group f, member 2; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Pecam1, platelet/endothelial adhesion molecule 1; Pou5f1, POU class 5 homeobox 1; SMA, smooth muscle actin; TIMP2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2; Tgfa, transforming growth factor, alpha; Three-dimensional suspension culture; Tymp, thymidine phosphorylase; VE-cadherin, vascular endothelial cadherin; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; iPS cell, inducible pluripotent stem cell; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR
Year: 2015 PMID: 31245454 PMCID: PMC6581788 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2015.10.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Fig. 1Scheme for induction of cardiovascular differentiation from mouse ES cells. Mouse ES cells were cultured in spinner flasks for cardiovascular differentiation. (A) For cardiac differentiation, R1-neo ES cells were cultured in the presence of noggin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. From day 10 to day 18, differentiated cells were cultured in the presence of G418 to select cardiomyocytes. (B) For CD31+ cell differentiation, embryoid bodies were dissociated enzymatically and subjected to MACS to separate Flk1+ cells on day 5. Flk1+ cells were plated onto collagen IV-coated tissue culture dishes and cultured in the presence of VEGF and 8-bromo-cAMP for further differentiation. After 3 days of re-culture, CD31+ cells were isolated from re-cultured Flk1+ cells by MACS.
Fig. 2ES cell-derived CD31+ cells were positive for endothelial markers. After 5 days of differentiation, Flk1+ cells were isolated by MACS and re-cultured onto collagen IV-coated tissue culture dishes with VEGF and 8-bromo-cAMP for further differentiation. After 3 days of Flk1+ cell differentiation, induced cells were immunostained with respective antibodies. (A) Immunostaining for CD31 (red) and mural cell markers (SMA, SM22α; green). (B) Numbers of Flk1+ and CD31+ cells. (C) Immunostaining for CD31 (red) and eNOS (green), and (D) for CD31 (green) and VE-cadherin (red). (E) Relative expression of endothelial marker genes in CD31+ cells derived from both mouse ES cells and mouse heart primary cultures. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bars = 400 μm (C and D). Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation for three separate experiments.
Fig. 3ES cell-derived CD31+ cells formed vascular network structures in co-culture with ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. (A) Schematic diagram of co-culture. (B) CD31+ network structure derived from mouse EMG7 ES cells (ES-CD31+) and neonatal mouse heart (nmh-CD31+) after 4 days in co-culture with R1-neo EYFP ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes and mouse dermal fibroblasts. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (red) and CD31 (green). (C) Analysis of CD31+ cell network structures within co-cultured cells at day 4. (D) R1-neo EYFP ES cell-derived CD31+ cell network structure in co-culture with R1-neo ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes and mouse dermal fibroblasts. CD31 (green). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Immunostaining for CD31+ cells in (B) and (D) was analyzed using MetaXpress software. Tube length and tube thickness are indicated. Scale bars = 400 μm in (B) and (D). Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation for three separate experiments in (C) and six separate experiments in (D). NS, not significant. (E) Immunostaining of cardiac cell sheet with CD31+ cell network structure. After non-invasive harvesting of cell sheets using temperature-responsive culture dishes, CD31+ cells formed well-established network structures throughout the cardiac cell sheet at day 4. CD31+ cells were derived from R1-neo EYFP ES cells. cTnT (red), CD31 (green). Square in left panel is magnified as right panel. Scale bars = 2 mm in left panel and 400 μm in right panel.
Fig. 4ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes had a positive effect on the formation of CD31+ cell network structure. (A) Schematic diagram of co-culture. (B) CD31+ cell network structure formed in co-culture with R1-neo ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes, R1-neo EYFP ES cell-derived CD31+ cells, and mouse dermal fibroblasts (C + E + F). Little CD31+ cell network structure was observed when R1-neo ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes were depleted from the co-culture (E + F). CD31 (green), nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). (C) Comparison of CD31+ cell network structure formation between C + E + F and E + F. Tube length and tube thickness are indicated. (D) CD31+ cell network structure formed in E + F with conditioned medium from co-cultures containing ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes (C + F). Tube length and tube thickness are indicated. (E) Effect of ES cell-derived cardiomyocyte density on formation of CD31+ cell network. Tube length and tube thickness are indicated. (F) Real-time PCR analyses of six genes demonstrated higher expression (>5-fold) in C + E + F compared with E + F by RT2 Profiler PCR Array. Gene expression levels in C + E + F, E + F, R1-neo ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes (C), mouse dermal fibroblasts (D), and R1-neo EYFP ES cell-derived CD31+ cells (E) were analyzed and the gene expression ratios for C + E + F, C, E, and F relative to E + F are indicated. (G) After 4 days of co-culture (C + E + F), cells were immunostained with respective antibodies for cTnT (green) and FGF1 (red). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). (H) Inhibition of CD31+ cell network formation by neutralizing FGF1 antibody. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Tube length and tube thickness were calculated from CD31+ cell staining. Scale bars = 400 μm in (B) and (E) and 200 μm in (G). Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation for eight separate experiments in (C), four separate experiments in (D), three separate experiments in (E) and (F), and six separate experiments in (H). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. NS, not significant.
Angiogenesis-related gene expression calculated by PCR array analysis. The genes, which expressed in C + E + F co-culture higher more than 5 fold than that in E + F co-culture, were indicated.
| Gene symbol | Fold |
|---|---|
| Fgf1 | 93.5 |
| Col4a3 | 24.62 |
| Mdk | 10.81 |
| Tgfa | 8.61 |
| Tymp | 6.37 |
| Cxcl5 | 5.57 |
| Egf | 5.55 |